Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Huawei AR161FG-L + PfSense 2.6.0 - ipsec s2s

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Russian
    94 Posts 3 Posters 37.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      Konstanti @rnduser
      last edited by

      @rnduser

      сделайте : как я написал
      добавьте в ACL 3999 зеркальное правило

      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rnduser @Konstanti
        last edited by rnduser

        @konstanti
        Новый текстовый документ (4).txt

        в туннель не заворачивается(
        счетчики по нулям

        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          Konstanti @rnduser
          last edited by

          @rnduser

          ICMP ,насколько я понимаю, немного не IP , может быть в этом причина того , что HW не заворачивает его в туннель
          Я верно понимаю , что если добавить в ACL 3999 правило

          rule 6 permit icmp source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255

          то туннель не поднимается ?

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rnduser @Konstanti
            last edited by

            @konstanti said in Huawei AR161FG-L + PfSense 2.6.0 - ipsec s2s:

            то туннель не поднимается ?

            поднимается, но в логах ошибки

            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              Konstanti @rnduser
              last edited by

              @rnduser
              обе фазы или только одна ?
              какие ошибки ?

              R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                rnduser @Konstanti
                last edited by

                @konstanti не поднималась вторая фаза. лог уже потер, и вернул как было

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  rnduser @Konstanti
                  last edited by rnduser

                  @konstanti вот что интересно.:
                  nat outbound?, это базовый ацл разрешающий все ip наружу с Gi0/0/4
                  поди и туннельный пакеты туда же летят?
                  К этому же интерфейсу прикручена айписек политика...

                  #
                  interface GigabitEthernet0/0/4
                  tcp adjust-mss 1200
                  ip address 192.168.22.100 255.255.255.0
                  nat outbound 2999
                  zone wan
                  ipsec policy p_2_p1

                  K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    Konstanti @rnduser
                    last edited by

                    @rnduser

                    а что за ACL 2999 ?

                    R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rnduser @Konstanti
                      last edited by

                      @konstanti
                      вот что nat session table all выдает когда пингуешь хост за ПфСенсом.
                      ACL 2999 - Basic ACL, вида permit any. т.е. направление - только исходящее.

                      Protocol : ICMP(1)
                      SrcAddr Vpn : 192.168.22.100
                      DestAddr Vpn : 10.9.20.220
                      Type Code IcmpId : 8 0 44004
                      NAT-Info

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R
                        rnduser @Konstanti
                        last edited by

                        @konstanti или нет?
                        ничего не понимаю уже.
                        Вот пинг на ту сторону. вот вывод NAT

                        [router001-k85]display nat session destination 10.9.20.220
                        NAT Session Table Information:
                        Protocol : ICMP(1)
                        SrcAddr Vpn : 10.9.30.220
                        DestAddr Vpn : 10.9.20.220
                        Type Code IcmpId : 8 0 1
                        NAT-Info
                        New SrcAddr : 192.168.22.100
                        New DestAddr : ----
                        New IcmpId : 10425

                        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          Konstanti @rnduser
                          last edited by

                          @rnduser
                          Все верно , по какой-то причине ICMP пакеты не заворачиваются в туннель и идут дальше на выход через ВАН интерфейс , где проходят через NAT и ..... теряются

                          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • R
                            rnduser @Konstanti
                            last edited by rnduser

                            @konstanti получается нужно поправить ACL прикрученый NATом к Gi0/0/4
                            интересно, так прокатит?

                            [router001-k85]display acl 3001
                            Advanced ACL 3001, 2 rules
                            Nat outbound
                            Acl's step is 5
                            rule 10 deny ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255
                            rule 20 permit ip

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              rnduser @rnduser
                              last edited by rnduser

                              @rnduser штош. с этим ACL пингов на ту сторону нет, но и в NAT трансляции не попадает icmp запрос до хоста за pfsense...
                              но и теперь трафик вроде попадает куда нужно

                              Total quantity of nonempty ACL number is 4

                              Basic ACL GigabitEthernet0/0/4 2999, 1 rule
                              Acl's step is 5
                              rule 5 permit

                              Advanced ACL 3001, 2 rules
                              Nat outbound
                              Acl's step is 5
                              rule 10 deny ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255 (2 matches)
                              rule 20 permit ip (15 matches)

                              Advanced ACL 3990, 3 rules
                              allow ipsec to local
                              Acl's step is 5
                              rule 10 permit icmp (52 matches)
                              rule 30 permit udp destination-port eq 500 (24 matches)
                              rule 35 permit udp destination-port eq 4500

                              Advanced ACL p_GigabitEthernet0/0/4_1 3999, 1 rule
                              Acl's step is 5
                              rule 5 permit ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255 (130 matches)

                              K R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                Konstanti @rnduser
                                last edited by

                                @rnduser
                                Ну, не только одними пингами мир живет . Попробуйте другой вид трафика .
                                По acl Вы все делаете по инструкции ( си в интернете ) те должен быть 1 acl в Вашем случае . И пинги должны бегать
                                Может быть сбой какой-то … перегрузить устройство не пробовали ?

                                R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R
                                  rnduser @Konstanti
                                  last edited by

                                  This post is deleted!
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    rnduser @Konstanti
                                    last edited by

                                    @konstanti
                                    перезагрузил обе стороны.
                                    Вот лог ПфСенса. Как я понимаю все гладко и DPD работает?
                                    Хотелось бы исключить хоть одну из сторон проблемы.

                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 8 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 8 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 7 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 7 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 6 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 6 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 5 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 5 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 4 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 4 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 3 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 3 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 2 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 2 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 1 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 1 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 0 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 0 [ ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
                                    Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (224 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [ IDr AUTH N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) SA TSi TSr ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1{4} state change: INSTALLING => INSTALLED
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1{4} established with SPIs c053b3ac_i 005ade22_o and TS 10.9.20.0/24|/0 === 10.9.30.0/24|/0
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> SPI 0x005ade22, src 192.168.22.200 dst 192.168.22.100
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> adding outbound ESP SA
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> SPI 0xc053b3ac, src 192.168.22.100 dst 192.168.22.200
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> adding inbound ESP SA
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> using HMAC_SHA2_256_128 for integrity
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> using AES_CBC for encryption
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1{4} state change: CREATED => INSTALLING
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> config: 10.9.30.0/24|/0, received: 10.9.30.0/24|/0 => match: 10.9.30.0/24|/0
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting traffic selectors for other:
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> config: 10.9.20.0/24|/0, received: 10.9.20.0/24|/0 => match: 10.9.20.0/24|/0
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting traffic selectors for us:
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/NO_EXT_SEQ
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/NO_EXT_SEQ
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposal matches
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting proposal:
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> found matching child config "con1" with prio 10
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> candidate "con1" with prio 5+5
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> 10.9.30.0/24|/0
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposing traffic selectors for other:
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> 10.9.20.0/24|/0
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposing traffic selectors for us:
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> looking for a child config for 10.9.20.0/24|/0 === 10.9.30.0/24|/0
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> maximum IKE_SA lifetime 27708s
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> scheduling rekeying in 24828s
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] state change: CONNECTING => ESTABLISHED
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] established between 192.168.22.200[192.168.22.200]...192.168.22.100[192.168.22.100]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> successfully created shared key MAC
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> authentication of '192.168.22.200' (myself) with pre-shared key
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> received ESP_TFC_PADDING_NOT_SUPPORTED, not using ESPv3 TFC padding
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> authentication of '192.168.22.100' with pre-shared key successful
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selected peer config 'con1'
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <2> candidate "con1", match: 1/20/3100 (me/other/ike)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <2> looking for peer configs matching 192.168.22.200[%any]...192.168.22.100[192.168.22.100]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[ENC] <2> parsed IKE_AUTH request 1 [ N(SET_WINSIZE) N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) IDi AUTH SA TSi TSr ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[NET] <2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (240 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[NET] <2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (448 bytes)
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[ENC] <2> generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(CHDLESS_SUP) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> proposal matches
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> selecting proposal:
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> IKE_SA (unnamed)[2] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> 192.168.22.100 is initiating an IKE_SA
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> received Cisco FlexVPN Supported vendor ID
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[ENC] <2> received unknown vendor ID: 48:55:41:57:45:49:2d:49:4b:45:76:31:44:53:43:50
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> remote endpoint changed from 0.0.0.0 to 192.168.22.100[500]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> local endpoint changed from 0.0.0.0[500] to 192.168.22.200[500]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> found matching ike config: 192.168.22.200...192.168.22.100 with prio 3100
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> candidate: 192.168.22.200...192.168.22.100, prio 3100
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> looking for an IKEv2 config for 192.168.22.200...192.168.22.100
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[ENC] <2> parsed IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) V V ]
                                    Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[NET] <2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (457 bytes)

                                    K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      Konstanti @rnduser
                                      last edited by Konstanti

                                      @rnduser
                                      тут все ок
                                      проблема именно в HW - по какой-то причине трафик не попадает в туннель

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        rnduser @Konstanti
                                        last edited by

                                        @konstanti после правки NAT Acl - попадает, только не ходит.

                                        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          Konstanti @rnduser
                                          last edited by

                                          @rnduser

                                          это что значит - поясните , Пожалуйста

                                          R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • R
                                            rnduser @rnduser
                                            last edited by

                                            @rnduser said in Huawei AR161FG-L + PfSense 2.6.0 - ipsec s2s:

                                            Advanced ACL p_GigabitEthernet0/0/4_1 3999, 1 rule
                                            Acl's step is 5
                                            rule 5 permit ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255 (130 matches)

                                            имею ввиду вот эту политику. 130 срабатываний.

                                            • трафик перехватывается
                                            • в таблице NAT outbound sessions - адреса интересующих сетей - отсутствуют.
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.