Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Huawei AR161FG-L + PfSense 2.6.0 - ipsec s2s

    Russian
    3
    94
    23.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      rnduser @rnduser
      last edited by rnduser

      @rnduser штош. с этим ACL пингов на ту сторону нет, но и в NAT трансляции не попадает icmp запрос до хоста за pfsense...
      но и теперь трафик вроде попадает куда нужно

      Total quantity of nonempty ACL number is 4

      Basic ACL GigabitEthernet0/0/4 2999, 1 rule
      Acl's step is 5
      rule 5 permit

      Advanced ACL 3001, 2 rules
      Nat outbound
      Acl's step is 5
      rule 10 deny ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255 (2 matches)
      rule 20 permit ip (15 matches)

      Advanced ACL 3990, 3 rules
      allow ipsec to local
      Acl's step is 5
      rule 10 permit icmp (52 matches)
      rule 30 permit udp destination-port eq 500 (24 matches)
      rule 35 permit udp destination-port eq 4500

      Advanced ACL p_GigabitEthernet0/0/4_1 3999, 1 rule
      Acl's step is 5
      rule 5 permit ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255 (130 matches)

      K R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        Konstanti @rnduser
        last edited by

        @rnduser
        Ну, не только одними пингами мир живет . Попробуйте другой вид трафика .
        По acl Вы все делаете по инструкции ( си в интернете ) те должен быть 1 acl в Вашем случае . И пинги должны бегать
        Может быть сбой какой-то … перегрузить устройство не пробовали ?

        R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          rnduser @Konstanti
          last edited by

          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rnduser @Konstanti
            last edited by

            @konstanti
            перезагрузил обе стороны.
            Вот лог ПфСенса. Как я понимаю все гладко и DPD работает?
            Хотелось бы исключить хоть одну из сторон проблемы.

            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 8 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 06[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 8 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:55:09 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 7 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 7 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:59 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 6 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 6 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:48 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 5 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 5 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:38 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 4 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 4 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:28 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 3 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 3 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:18 charon 36623 07[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 2 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 2 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:54:08 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 1 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 1 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:53:58 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 0 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (80 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating INFORMATIONAL request 0 [ ]
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing IKE_DPD task
            Jan 23 15:53:48 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD request
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (224 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating IKE_AUTH response 1 [ IDr AUTH N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) SA TSi TSr ]
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1{4} state change: INSTALLING => INSTALLED
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1{4} established with SPIs c053b3ac_i 005ade22_o and TS 10.9.20.0/24|/0 === 10.9.30.0/24|/0
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> SPI 0x005ade22, src 192.168.22.200 dst 192.168.22.100
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> adding outbound ESP SA
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> SPI 0xc053b3ac, src 192.168.22.100 dst 192.168.22.200
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> adding inbound ESP SA
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> using HMAC_SHA2_256_128 for integrity
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> using AES_CBC for encryption
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CHD] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1{4} state change: CREATED => INSTALLING
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> config: 10.9.30.0/24|/0, received: 10.9.30.0/24|/0 => match: 10.9.30.0/24|/0
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting traffic selectors for other:
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> config: 10.9.20.0/24|/0, received: 10.9.20.0/24|/0 => match: 10.9.20.0/24|/0
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting traffic selectors for us:
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/NO_EXT_SEQ
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/NO_EXT_SEQ
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposal matches
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting proposal:
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> found matching child config "con1" with prio 10
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> candidate "con1" with prio 5+5
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> 10.9.30.0/24|/0
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposing traffic selectors for other:
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> 10.9.20.0/24|/0
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposing traffic selectors for us:
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> looking for a child config for 10.9.20.0/24|/0 === 10.9.30.0/24|/0
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> maximum IKE_SA lifetime 27708s
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> scheduling rekeying in 24828s
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] state change: CONNECTING => ESTABLISHED
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] established between 192.168.22.200[192.168.22.200]...192.168.22.100[192.168.22.100]
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> successfully created shared key MAC
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> authentication of '192.168.22.200' (myself) with pre-shared key
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> received ESP_TFC_PADDING_NOT_SUPPORTED, not using ESPv3 TFC padding
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[IKE] <con1|2> authentication of '192.168.22.100' with pre-shared key successful
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <con1|2> selected peer config 'con1'
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <2> candidate "con1", match: 1/20/3100 (me/other/ike)
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[CFG] <2> looking for peer configs matching 192.168.22.200[%any]...192.168.22.100[192.168.22.100]
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[ENC] <2> parsed IKE_AUTH request 1 [ N(SET_WINSIZE) N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) IDi AUTH SA TSi TSr ]
            Jan 23 15:53:38 charon 36623 08[NET] <2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (240 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[NET] <2> sending packet: from 192.168.22.200[500] to 192.168.22.100[500] (448 bytes)
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[ENC] <2> generating IKE_SA_INIT response 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(CHDLESS_SUP) N(MULT_AUTH) ]
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/MODP_2048
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> proposal matches
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> selecting proposal:
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> IKE_SA (unnamed)[2] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> 192.168.22.100 is initiating an IKE_SA
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> received Cisco FlexVPN Supported vendor ID
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[ENC] <2> received unknown vendor ID: 48:55:41:57:45:49:2d:49:4b:45:76:31:44:53:43:50
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> remote endpoint changed from 0.0.0.0 to 192.168.22.100[500]
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[IKE] <2> local endpoint changed from 0.0.0.0[500] to 192.168.22.200[500]
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> found matching ike config: 192.168.22.200...192.168.22.100 with prio 3100
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> candidate: 192.168.22.200...192.168.22.100, prio 3100
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[CFG] <2> looking for an IKEv2 config for 192.168.22.200...192.168.22.100
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[ENC] <2> parsed IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) V V ]
            Jan 23 15:53:37 charon 36623 09[NET] <2> received packet: from 192.168.22.100[500] to 192.168.22.200[500] (457 bytes)

            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              Konstanti @rnduser
              last edited by Konstanti

              @rnduser
              тут все ок
              проблема именно в HW - по какой-то причине трафик не попадает в туннель

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                rnduser @Konstanti
                last edited by

                @konstanti после правки NAT Acl - попадает, только не ходит.

                K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  Konstanti @rnduser
                  last edited by

                  @rnduser

                  это что значит - поясните , Пожалуйста

                  R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    rnduser @rnduser
                    last edited by

                    @rnduser said in Huawei AR161FG-L + PfSense 2.6.0 - ipsec s2s:

                    Advanced ACL p_GigabitEthernet0/0/4_1 3999, 1 rule
                    Acl's step is 5
                    rule 5 permit ip source 10.9.30.0 0.0.0.255 destination 10.9.20.0 0.0.0.255 (130 matches)

                    имею ввиду вот эту политику. 130 срабатываний.

                    • трафик перехватывается
                    • в таблице NAT outbound sessions - адреса интересующих сетей - отсутствуют.
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rnduser @Konstanti
                      last edited by

                      @konstanti уезжал на несколько часов. оставил как есть. приехал, а влогах вон что:

                      Time: Jan 23 19:24:21
                      IP: 10.9.30.254
                      Host: 2023-1-23
                      Facility: local7
                      Priority: notice
                      Tag:
                      Message: 16:24:17 router001-k85 %%01IKE/5/IKE_NEGO_FAIL(l)[858]:IPSec tunnel negotiation fails. (IfIndex=7, SeqNum=0, PeerAddress=192.168.22.200, PeerPort=500, Reason=receive proposal mismatch or use sm in ikev2)

                      буду сверять настройки сторон.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R
                        rnduser @Konstanti
                        last edited by

                        @konstanti ну получилось вроде бы. уже завтра проверю еще раз.

                        werterW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • werterW
                          werter @rnduser
                          last edited by werter

                          Добрый
                          @rnduser
                          Сменить хуавей на пф можно в будущем?
                          Пф умеет ipsec vti, что гораздо удобнее в плане pbr.

                          R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            rnduser @werter
                            last edited by

                            @werter
                            Добрый день.
                            Нет , конкретно в этом случае с обной стороны туннеля должен быть аппаратный маршрутизатор.

                            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              Konstanti @rnduser
                              last edited by

                              @rnduser
                              так все заработало или как ?
                              в чем была проблема ?

                              R 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                rnduser @Konstanti
                                last edited by

                                @konstanti доброго дня.
                                Кроме не верной настройки NAT, когда траффик предназначался туннелю, но попадал на NAT Outbound, видимо, была проблема в proposal на первой фазе. причем, в дефолтном режиме детализации ipsec не было никаких сообщений о проблеме (вы и сами лог видели). А со стороны Huawei в "ike error-log" были сообщения о "ike mismatch".
                                В итоге снова пересобрал ipsec profile и сверил с PfSense, вроде работает. Теперь нужно всё ещё раз перепроверить и разобраться с настройкой Firewall, меня терзают сомнения...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R
                                  rnduser @werter
                                  last edited by

                                  @werter
                                  Вы не поверите, но на этом сайте стоял PfSense с той стороны туннеля (OpenVpn s2s), но это было так: ProxMox + PfSense+WinServer+ip surveillance. В итоге потребность сократилась до Маршрутизатора и ip-surveillance.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    rnduser @Konstanti
                                    last edited by

                                    @konstanti
                                    в итоге вот рабочий сеттинг со стороны PfSense
                                    working-setup.jpg
                                    погонял трафик, вроде все корректно, заглянул в enc0 и em0 (wan-iface) - ходит куда нужно.
                                    в тестовой лабе, Huawei <--> PfSense (Celeron J3455, AES-NI) , 250-290Mbit/s. Между двумя одинаковыми Хуавеями- 530Mbit/s ))
                                    Спасибо всем за помощь.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      rnduser @Konstanti
                                      last edited by

                                      @konstanti добрый день.
                                      А если нужно больше одной сети пробрасывать в туннель, добавляем дополнительные записи в Phase2 ?

                                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K
                                        Konstanti @rnduser
                                        last edited by

                                        @rnduser
                                        Да, все верно , добавляем отдправило а acl или запись со стороны pf в настройках фазы-2 ( или играемся маской подсети /wildcard если такое позволяет адресация )

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R
                                          rnduser @Konstanti
                                          last edited by

                                          @konstanti пока не пойму как со стороны хуавея это сделать?
                                          за ним две сети:

                                          • 10.12.200.0/24
                                          • 10.12.202.0/24
                                            Добавлять ещё одно правило в ACL Policy или накрывать обе сети wildcard. Если wildcard, то какая маска? что-то не соображу? 0.0.252.255?
                                          K 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • K
                                            Konstanti @rnduser
                                            last edited by

                                            @rnduser

                                            Или добавляем правило в ацл и запись в пф
                                            Итого 2 записи с каждой стороны
                                            Или правим существующую с обеих сторон
                                            Начать эксперимент можно с
                                            Pf 10.12.0.0/16
                                            Hw 10.12.0.0 0.0.255.255

                                            Потом уже можно менять маску , если надо

                                            R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post