Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel I226-V: Good or bad?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    13 Posts 4 Posters 4.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      riahc8 @Dobby_
      last edited by

      @dobby_ said in Intel I226-V: Good or bad?:

      @riahc8

      If you get 1 GBit/s as the internet connection from your ISP
      not seldom is a ONT or fibre modem also present and this
      devices came in the last time sorted with 2.5 GBit/s ports.

      So if you are in that or a similar case you may be good
      sorted with an 2.5 GBit/s port to have no bottleneck.

      Not sure what you are saying....

      Obviously, I have symmetrical 1Gbps up/down

      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        Daniel_Hyde @riahc8
        last edited by

        @riahc8

        They are saying if your ONT only has 1Gbps port you will see no benefit of connecting it to a 2.5Gbps NIC

        Thanks
        Dan

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          riahc8 @Daniel_Hyde
          last edited by riahc8

          @daniel_hyde said in Intel I226-V: Good or bad?:

          @riahc8

          They are saying if your ONT only has 1Gbps port you will see no benefit of connecting it to a 2.5Gbps NIC

          Thanks
          Dan

          Im actually talking about compatibility

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            Daniel_Hyde @riahc8
            last edited by

            @riahc8

            I know, I was just explaining what the other person meant.

            Thanks
            Dan

            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              riahc8 @Daniel_Hyde
              last edited by

              @daniel_hyde said in Intel I226-V: Good or bad?:

              @riahc8

              I know, I was just explaining what the other person meant.

              Thanks
              Dan

              Ah OK, got you. Sorry about the misunderstanding.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                We use that NIC in the 8200 and it works fine. Passes 2.5Gbps no problem. 1Gbps is, as you'd expect, no problem. Given a CPU that can handle it of course.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Dobby_D
                  Dobby_
                  last edited by

                  @riahc8

                  Now, its clear I have to use the DEV pfSense 2.7 build but besides that, is the card good for 1Gbps up/down?

                  1 GBit/s on WAN or LAN was not clear for me to find out
                  here at this point. So please sorry I was imagine you were
                  talking about the WAN speed.

                  Not sure what you are saying....

                  And me was not really able to find out if you are talking about, the WAN or the LAN speed.

                  Obviously, I have symmetrical 1Gbps up/down

                  I want to go with the newer Intel i226-V it would be the
                  never ones.

                  #~. @Dobby

                  Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                  PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                  PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    The one thing I will point out is that igc does not support fix line speed/duplex. It can only link to a device configured to autonegotiate. Though you can set what link speeds it will negotiate to.
                    That shouldn't be a problem since Gigabit requires auto-negotiation as part of the spec.
                    If you have some ancient device with a 10M fixed port it's going to have a hard time.

                    Steve

                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • R
                      riahc8 @stephenw10
                      last edited by riahc8

                      @stephenw10 said in Intel I226-V: Good or bad?:

                      The one thing I will point out is that igc does not support fix line speed/duplex. It can only link to a device configured to autonegotiate. Though you can set what link speeds it will negotiate to.
                      That shouldn't be a problem since Gigabit requires auto-negotiation as part of the spec.
                      If you have some ancient device with a 10M fixed port it's going to have a hard time.

                      Steve

                      Well, in a general sense, hardware wise or virtual wise, there will always be a switch so....I dont think there will be ANY scenario where a hardware pfSense with a Intel I226-V NIC will be directly connected to a ancient device with a 10M NIC

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        If it's possible someone will try it. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          riahc8 @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 said in Intel I226-V: Good or bad?:

                          If it's possible someone will try it. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                          Well, that is true. Good leaving a disclaimer.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.