Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plus 23.05 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    39 Posts 4 Posters 6.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      SiDegr @stephenw10
      last edited by SiDegr

      @stephenw10

      I see nothing related to speedshift in dmesg the only thing I see is in regards to speedstep and it’s this line

      est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0
      

      However it only shows up for core 0 some posts I have seen online it shows up for all cores that the cpu exposes to the kernel like 0, 1, 2 and 3 in my case

      Not sure if that could be an issue as well

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        SiDegr @stephenw10
        last edited by SiDegr

        This post is deleted!
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          That is probably fine. Speedstep can only set the P-states all the same anyway so it only really needs to use core 0. Speedshift can set each core individually and does so at much faster rates. But your CPU doesn't support it so not a problem.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            SiDegr @stephenw10
            last edited by SiDegr

            @stephenw10

            Oh ok then it makes sense for speedshift to not get attached at boot

            Well for now it seems that the only solution is to just keep monitor mwait off on the BIOS side and only let the cores enter at most a C1 state cause anything more than C1 is extremely unstable, it would be nice to see that fixed tough, also it might have to do with the fact the freebsd 14 is still in a fairly early beta stage and might have issues

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              SiDegr
              last edited by SiDegr

              Some times i wish that a 1100 was enough but with a 1Gbps internet connection it won't do and the 2100 is way over budget and an overkill for a home user. Also where i live, they resell the 1100 for 500 euro for a 190 euro device :P

              Dobby_D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Dobby_D
                Dobby_ @SiDegr
                last edited by

                @sidegr

                Today: 1 dollar = 0,93 €
                $189 = 174 €

                Netgate SG1100 for around ~249 € plus shipping fee
                Netgate SG2100 for around ~449 € plus shipping fee

                #~. @Dobby

                Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  SiDegr @Dobby_
                  last edited by SiDegr

                  @dobby_

                  Yeah see those are prices from a german reseller, the official reseller where i live sells the 1100 for 500 euros :P And i am not sure even if i ordered it from another country i would probably get import charges on top of whatever the price is and who knows how much those would be

                  Nonetheless the SG1100 is not enough for a gigabit internet connection and the 2100 is out of my budget this is why i went for the ZimaBoard which supposedly supported pfSense they even have it on their website although it has caused me nothing but issues since i installed it.. First the NICs which as i mentioned before i was expecting some issues but my general concensus was that dissabling HW checksum offload would fix most of em but for me it was straight up kernel panics every like 20-30 mins

                  Then i fixed that by manually adding the realtek kmod driver and now i have the cpu sleep state issues

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    SiDegr
                    last edited by SiDegr

                    My old box was working like a charm but since it was a thin client pc it only had one integrated nic and i had to use a usb 3.0 to Gbe adapter as my second NIC which was bottlenecking my connection to around 350Mbps since i upgraded to Gbps so i had to change it

                    Now don't get me wrong the ZimaBoard is a pretty nice SBC and very capable but in the current state of things it is not the best option for someone that intends to use it as a home firewall appliance, the only thing that i was able to run hassle free was Sophos XG Home which is extremely heavy for the cpu and has also a 6GB RAM limit if you don't buy a licence which makes the other 2 on my board useless plus all my experience and setup knowledge was always on pfSense

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      SiDegr
                      last edited by

                      Hello again, i can now confirm that i did not have any kernel panics since my last post

                      I did not do anything in particular i have just switched back the max C state to C1 and i kept the microcode update process enabled in the loader.conf

                      I have now just updated to the 23.05 Release and lets hope it will continue to be stable :P

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        SiDegr
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10

                        Also, how come that 23.05 is in "RELEASE" but it still shows up as the "next stable release" and not the "current stable release" in the updates menu?

                        Dobby_D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Dobby_D
                          Dobby_ @SiDegr
                          last edited by

                          @sidegr said in Kernel Panics on Intel Apollo Lake Processors:

                          Also, how come that 23.05 is in "RELEASE" but it still shows up as the "next stable release" and not the "current stable release" in the updates menu?

                          It was quick changed for a moment to Release and then
                          it was switched back, but the image is the same as it
                          was confirmed by @stephenw10 in another thread.

                          #~. @Dobby

                          Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
                          PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
                          PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            You should see the release as current stable now.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.