Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    AP with onboard built in NAS abilities/multiple MAC Hardware Layer 2 addresses

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wireless
    wifimac-addressdhcpethernetstatic mapping
    39 Posts 5 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JonathanLeeJ
      JonathanLee @JKnott
      last edited by JonathanLee

      @JKnott

      "According to the tech (apple support) the AirPort Extreme is "unpredictable" if you attempt to use USB drives when the router(AP) is in bridge mode.." The AP has a MAC mapped for it's NAS USB drive right? You state that PfSense can not see it again if it's in bridge mode under this configuration it still sees the same broadcast domains and arp requests to find that NAS correct?

      Yes let's agree under normal APs without a NAS built in it wouldn't care and it would only need the one MAC for Ethernet and it passes the traffic normally.

      But for a network attached storage plugged in by way of USB into the AP why would it act unpredictable per the AP developer when set to bridge mode? It still works.

      It creates a kind of weird condition here that I think would require both MACs to mapped. Again it does spot the other host name here meaning it saw and mapped it for a while before it changed the MAC when it updated the table and left the old hostname.

      1687905961410-screenshot-2023-06-27-at-3.41.20-pm.png

      Make sure to upvote

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        The NAS function should still use the Ethernet MAC IMO. If it randomly uses any MAC from the bridge that sounds like a bug.
        The only reason I could imagine it using a wireless interface directly would be if it's running as a wireless NAS. But that's quite an extreme edge case.

        Probably the best thing here is don't use a WIFI AP as a NAS. ๐Ÿ˜‰

        JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          It's still using the Ethernet MAC in that screenshot. But because you have 3 hostnames configured for the same IP address it's probably just showing the last matched.

          JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • JonathanLeeJ
            JonathanLee @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 yeahhh that was the goal so it could find the MAC-IP map when needed and the Ethernet MAC-IP map. Yeahhh ๐Ÿ˜Š so it's updating when needed again it leaves the hostname when it updated to the other MAC in the Arp table but the point is the wireless AP's NAS is mapped.

            Make sure to upvote

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JonathanLeeJ
              JonathanLee @stephenw10
              last edited by JonathanLee

              @stephenw10 it's essentially a wireless NAS it's part of the AP. It's the airport extreme AP/ apple time machine software.

              Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 1.29.05 PM.png
              (AP bridge mode to pfSense Firewall)

              Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 1.28.34 PM.png
              (Set to Bridge Mode)

              Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 1.28.41 PM.png
              (NAS within the AP itself)

              Screenshot 2023-06-28 at 1.33.20 PM.png
              (Accessible NAS within bridge mode set AP)

              Make sure to upvote

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JonathanLeeJ
                JonathanLee @stephenw10
                last edited by JonathanLee

                @stephenw10 I made a Redmine ticket for the hostname mix ups because it should update the hostname or block inputting different ones because logs could be wrong if it doesn't use the right hostnames.

                Make sure to upvote

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @JonathanLee
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @JonathanLee said in AP with onboard built in NAS abilities/multiple MAC Hardware Layer 2 addresses:

                  I made a Redmine ticket for the hostname mix ups

                  And what is this redmine number? Seems like lack of understanding of basic concepts if you ask me vs some issue with pfsense.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    If there's a bug here it's probably that you shouldn't be able to add the same IP address to multiple dhcp static mappings.
                    But you can't ever prevent all config errors. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                    JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • JonathanLeeJ
                      JonathanLee @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 we can try to prevent all the errors ๐Ÿ˜‰

                      Make sure to upvote

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JonathanLeeJ
                        JonathanLee @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/14516

                        Opened

                        Make sure to upvote

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @JonathanLee
                          last edited by

                          @JonathanLee

                          "With Multiple static ARP MAC-IP pairing to the same IP address"

                          So you don't see the problem with this? Thought you wanted to reduce traffic?

                          So if I create multiple entries for say 192.168.1.100 for like 3 different mac addresses.. And then I want to send traffic to 192.168.1.100 - so I will put 3 packets on the wire? Sending to all 3 mac addresses?

                          Like I said lack of understanding of basic concepts is the issue here.

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JonathanLeeJ
                            JonathanLee @johnpoz
                            last edited by JonathanLee

                            @johnpoz Why does the GUI allow it? Leading to, it does allow it. Therefore, why does it map to the wrong host names? If only one shows as an active DHCP lease at a time wouldn't it only send packets to that device? It also would not recognize active leases with multiple entries it shows them offline. Hypothetical situation, an admin has a list of thousands of static DHCP entries, wouldn't he want some type or control for multiple entries and or a way to log the correct hostname that in use at that particular time if he needed multiple entries? It didn't list the right hostname in my example. The PfSense system software now has experimenatal layer 2 Ethernet filtering rules as of 23.05, shouldn't we start to research this? Spoofed MAC addresses so on?

                            Make sure to upvote

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              There's only so much input validation and error checking we can do. But it seems like this might be possible.

                              Ultimately the user can configure pfSense in any number of broken ways we can't prevent.

                              Steve

                              JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • JonathanLeeJ
                                JonathanLee @stephenw10
                                last edited by JonathanLee

                                @stephenw10 yes we can agree the user can configure it wrong all over. Again, an administrator might fat finger a large static DHCP list with a couple entries thus causing hostname mix ups. That for one would be very hard to pinpoint. Moreover, we know the amount of hours system administrators work. It's a lot of hours. This would make PfSense have a ease of use software functionality built in. I assumed that if pfSense allowed multiple duplicate entries, it was done for a situation when two devices need to be swapped in and out and need the same IP address, in this mindset PfSense should still log the correct hostnames. Again, if that was the reason for PfSense allowing the GUI duplicate entries.

                                Weird thing to research, but the hostnames mixup was what I was after and or why
                                PfSense would allow the duplicate entries in the first place. Let's agree admins have monster static dhcp lists that are updated and changed all the time within a secure setting. This situation would want controls in place for hostnames. Finally, logs for the hostnames could get bonkered up and with a monster list and that would be hard to track down why hostnames are wrong. We know PfSense now has experimental layer 2 Ethernet filtering.

                                Make sure to upvote

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.