Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    LAGG and VPNs

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    79 Posts 2 Posters 10.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      stevencavanagh @stevencavanagh
      last edited by

      I have now tried every possible combination available to force the port to 1G (no LAG) but unable get it. If I connect the same cable from laptop to pfsense NIC I get 1G so not card or cable. Looks like I will have to go back to draytek to sort it as I'm now out of ideas!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        What about if you use the em0 NIC?

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          stevencavanagh @stephenw10
          last edited by

          Not tried using that but I'll give it a shot and see what happens!

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • S
            stevencavanagh @stevencavanagh
            last edited by

            Ok, swapped over to em0 and it connected at 1G!

            So, took the same lead and plugged into a number of ports on both switches and always connected at 1G.

            Consequently, went around each of the 5 ports individually with the same lead and results below:-

            em0 - 1G
            igb0 - 1G
            igb1 - 1G
            igb2 - 100M
            igb3 - 100M

            Hence card 2 has the problem. Cards 1&2 are the same type and new.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              stevencavanagh @stevencavanagh
              last edited by stevencavanagh

              swapped over the LAN cards out of desperation and now have a 1G connection (not LAG)...

              fd414c78-e689-4c7f-9987-21bd3be3ca5c-image.png

              However, ignoring LAGG for now, I have a physical connection between the 2 switches but unable to access anything on the other switch. Must be VLAN issue but not sure where to go from here

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                stevencavanagh @stevencavanagh
                last edited by

                So, I now have everything up in terms of connections but running on a single cable, not LAGG on igb1.

                0382671e-3c22-4e21-a49f-8797f701abc7-image.png

                Firewall is fully open which at some point I will need to lock down but LAG now the remaining issue.

                NIC 2 seems to be the issue.

                Initially I installed pfsense with only 1 NIC card in and then added the second later once I had bought it. Pfsense detected it so I assumed all was good. Could that be causing the issue?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  No it shouldn't make any difference how the cards were added. I agree there's something different about that second card.

                  Check the revision is the same as shown by: pciconf -lv

                  It could be a firmware difference. Looks for the eeprom version in the boot log like:

                  igb0: EEPROM V3.11-0 eTrack 0x80000469
                  
                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    Info from pciconf -1v

                    igb2@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x10c9 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0xa03c
                    vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
                    device = '82576 Gigabit Network Connection'
                    class = network
                    subclass = ethernet
                    igb3@pci0:2:0:1: class=0x020000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x10c9 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0xa03c
                    vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
                    device = '82576 Gigabit Network Connection'
                    class = network
                    subclass = ethernet

                    Where do I find the boot log?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      How does that compare with igb0/1?

                      You can see the boot log in the gui or in /var/log/dmesg.boot

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        Exactly the same as igb0/1

                        Boot log shows EEPROM version to be the same for all 4 ports

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Hmm, maybe just a faulty card then.

                          Have you tested the LAGG using the NIC that links at 1G? I bet it works fine. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            Can't test it as igb0 is used for WAN and igb1 for LAN but I have no doubt that it will work for LAGG!

                            That is why I purchased the 2nd card to use separately for the LAGG interface.

                            I think the card is fine as I can connect to the card in the pfsense box from the laptop and the link is immediately 1G on both ports and I've switched the 2 cards around in the pfsense box and the issue remains on the card 2 position i.e. the problem does not transfer with the card. It could be the PC but doubt it and there is no more spare slots to try as it is a DELL Optiplex SFF PC.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Hmm odd. You might try using pciconfg -lvc Make sure both show the same PCIe speeds.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                Look the same to me! Below is igb1 & igb2, the other 2 are the same.

                                igb1@pci0:1:0:1: class=0x020000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x10c9 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0xa03c
                                vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
                                device = '82576 Gigabit Network Connection'
                                class = network
                                subclass = ethernet
                                cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0
                                cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks
                                cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled
                                Table in map 0x1c[0x0], PBA in map 0x1c[0x2000]
                                cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 256(512) FLR RO NS
                                max read 512
                                link x1(x4) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1)
                                ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 1 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected
                                ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 98b785ffff00fd44
                                ecap 000e[150] = ARI 1
                                ecap 0010[160] = SR-IOV 1 IOV disabled, Memory Space disabled, ARI disabled
                                0 VFs configured out of 8 supported
                                First VF RID Offset 0x0180, VF RID Stride 0x0002
                                VF Device ID 0x10ca
                                Page Sizes: 4096 (enabled), 8192, 65536, 262144, 1048576, 4194304
                                igb2@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x10c9 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0xa03c
                                vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
                                device = '82576 Gigabit Network Connection'
                                class = network
                                subclass = ethernet
                                cap 01[40] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0
                                cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks
                                cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 10 messages, enabled
                                Table in map 0x1c[0x0], PBA in map 0x1c[0x2000]
                                cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 256(512) FLR RO NS
                                max read 512
                                link x1(x4) speed 2.5(2.5) ASPM disabled(L0s/L1)
                                ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected
                                ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 98b785ffff00fd48
                                ecap 000e[150] = ARI 1
                                ecap 0010[160] = SR-IOV 1 IOV disabled, Memory Space disabled, ARI disabled
                                0 VFs configured out of 8 supported
                                First VF RID Offset 0x0180, VF RID Stride 0x0002
                                VF Device ID 0x10ca
                                Page Sizes: 4096 (enabled), 8192, 65536, 262144, 1048576, 4194304

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  Yup, looks the same to me too. ๐Ÿ˜•

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    The only other thing I can think of is that the 2 PCIe slots (1 of x4, 1 of x16) are an older version than the card installed and therefore defaulting to the lower speed but this doesn't make sense either as when I plug my laptop direct to the pfsense PC it gets 1G

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Yeah to be honest I would still expect the ports to link at 1G even if the PCIe slot was somehow unable to carry it.
                                      I can't think of anything that would follow the slot like that. ๐Ÿ˜•

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        Tried everything I can possibly think of now, including days googling around it but to no avail. Contacted Draytek again but no joy there either!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Hmm, I wonder if there's a power restriction on that slot and the NIC sees that. Must be something different about that slot

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            stevencavanagh @stephenw10
                                            last edited by

                                            Are you meaning a power restriction in the PC settings or a potential fault?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.