Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Setting low TTL to fix Squid issue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    23 Posts 4 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @JonathanLee
      last edited by michmoor

      @JonathanLee I block as much DoH as i can based on the pfblocker filter ive applied.
      My upstream DNS is CloudFlare. I am not using my ISP dns servers.
      I am already blocking external DNS and DoT.

      I created a floating rule
      c76c7af4-df3f-4e5d-8cad-b3243ba4ca4d-image.png

      I created an alias deny
      effa6878-b42b-4974-bfd8-60c74524d400-image.png

      Custom Unbound settings
      61581350-be56-46ca-8023-d3c97ebd679e-image.png

      Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
      Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
      Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
      Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
      JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @michmoor
        last edited by michmoor

        @michmoor said in Setting low TTL to fix Squid issue:
        @JonathanLee

        So a common problem which i really dont know why it happens is why there is a problem specifically with Chrome.
        Chrome will clearly be in conflict with whats in the dns cache and here are the errors
        For example, if i visit Twitter (X) i am unable to load any pictures or video.
        Wireshark reveals the reason why.
        Its always DNS. :)

        Problem outlined: https://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/host_verify_strict/
        Dont really know how to implement this host verify strict command..

        f060a6f3-6d37-4163-a49e-5b1c8111cd60-image.png

        Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
        Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
        Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
        Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
        JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

        JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • JonathanLeeJ
          JonathanLee @michmoor
          last edited by JonathanLee

          @michmoor

          http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/host_verify_strict/

          Have you attempted to set this in advanced options to on or off? It's default is off. I am having this same issue with Apple music and mzstatic making it's own get requests.

          https://forum.netgate.com/topic/182866/universal-procedure-pointers-upp-mzstatic-com-s-mode-of-access-redirector-question/

          I am having the opposite it's apparently approving connection as splice with the same IP sometimes.

          I think under advanced options is where it needs to be.

          host_verify_strict on
          host_verify_strict off

          Make sure to upvote

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @JonathanLee
            last edited by michmoor

            @JonathanLee I did apply it under advanced options but doesnt seem to have any impact. I still get the /409 errors.
            Do you know where the squid conf file is? I wonder if its really set..

            i got so desperate i set it in each box lol

            c02fba43-5e3b-4f16-bbd6-94f2921484a6-image.png

            Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
            Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
            Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
            Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
            JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

            M JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @michmoor
              last edited by

              But to my point about devices with hard coded dns servers

              Look at this. My IoT television gets its DHCP from my pfsenese. Pfsense hands its IP out as the DNS server yet as you can see from pfblocker its still requesting a google dns.
              Its hard coded in a lot of these devices which is an issue but dont think thats why squid breaks.

              300774ee-c795-47c6-b678-521e0f52bc5d-image.png

              343efe68-9721-4072-910a-411822704b8b-image.png

              Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
              Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
              Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
              Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
              JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

              JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JonathanLeeJ
                JonathanLee @michmoor
                last edited by

                @michmoor

                Try

                /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf
                Screenshot 2023-09-19 201027.jpg

                Make sure to upvote

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • JonathanLeeJ
                  JonathanLee @michmoor
                  last edited by

                  @michmoor

                  I wanted to check with you on Netflix, I forgot to mention I have Hulu and other streaming services set to no cache. Are you attempting to cache Netflix?

                  I set them to never cache on Squid

                  de20a524-8627-487e-afc7-abc2854f1122-image.png

                  Did you set a NAT for the DNS rules to force all devices to use the firewall?

                  That should help if you NAT it.

                  Make sure to upvote

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JonathanLeeJ
                    JonathanLee @michmoor
                    last edited by JonathanLee

                    @michmoor Are you blocking port 53 for 8.8.8.8? it shows a red lock, it should only block port 443 for 8.8.8.8, 53 is the standard or if you use dns over tls ssl 853 that might be the issue, TheGreatWall_DoH is blocking standard port 53 over just the 443 DoH access.

                    Create a NAT rule for all DNS requests that are not being sent to the firewall or it's loopback. And force it to go to the firewall.

                    Make sure to upvote

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • NollipfSenseN
                      NollipfSense
                      last edited by

                      Interesting conversation here, indeed...thanks for sharing!

                      pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
                      pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • M
                        michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @JonathanLee
                        last edited by

                        @JonathanLee
                        Im blocking 53 and 443
                        The red lock in pfblocker should indicate that traffic is being blocked - sinkholed so dont think theres any worry about that.

                        bb79dc10-6d56-43a9-96d5-bfe3fee06db6-image.png

                        Floating Rule

                        8d7a1bfc-c955-4df9-83ee-d8b7b27e4d2e-image.png

                        So in my case theres no reason i can think of to use Port Forards.

                        Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                        Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                        Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                        Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                        JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                        JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JonathanLeeJ
                          JonathanLee @michmoor
                          last edited by

                          @michmoor with pfBlocker don't you still need to redirect the clients that are ignoring the DNS settings still? That is interesting, I always have clients that will attempt to use a different DNS all the time with NAT it doesn't matter they go where I configured them too unless they use some new experimental protocol.

                          Make sure to upvote

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @JonathanLee
                            last edited by

                            @JonathanLee I will try adding a nat redirect just to test to see if it makes things better.

                            To your other question, i am not using Squid Proxy to cache anything.

                            7f3a6c1f-bc5a-4ab2-afa2-f2a3996eccb2-image.png

                            Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                            Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                            Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                            Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                            JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                            JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JonathanLeeJ
                              JonathanLee @michmoor
                              last edited by

                              @michmoor I love the cache I have DSL/ copper it acts as an accelerator

                              Make sure to upvote

                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @JonathanLee
                                last edited by

                                @JonathanLee ahhh
                                Im on 500/500 Fiber.

                                Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.