Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    VPN point to point

    General pfSense Questions
    2
    40
    2.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      rmainero @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 said in VPN point to point:

      Ah OK. So you had to update the ciphers at both ends and then this started?

      That's right, modify both points, and only one has this behavior the other works perfect

      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        How do you mean 'both points'?

        Two tunnels?

        The other tunnel that's configured in pfSense? What's at the other end of that?

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          rmainero @stephenw10
          last edited by

          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rmainero @rmainero
            last edited by

            @rmainero
            router cisco 881 both points

            What I see is that the problem point rises in port 4500 nat-t and the other in port 500 but both are in automatic

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              It's more that when one side moves from port 500 to port 4500 for the key exchange the other side rejects it. You can see in the logs that happens both ways.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Both Cisco end points are behind NAT?

                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  rmainero @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 said in VPN point to point:

                  Both Cisco end points are behind NAT?

                  Yes, both computers configured the same, with different key and subnet

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Something is different. Same firmware version on the Cisco endpoints?

                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rmainero @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 said in VPN point to point:

                      Something is different. Same firmware version on the Cisco endpoints?

                      No, the firmware is different, I'm going to try putting the same

                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • R
                        rmainero @rmainero
                        last edited by

                        @rmainero
                        Last 500 IPsec Log Entries. (Maximum 500)
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] mobike = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] aggressive = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] dscp = 0x00
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] encap = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] dpd_delay = 10
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] dpd_timeout = 60
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] fragmentation = 2
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] childless = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] unique = UNIQUE_REPLACE
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] keyingtries = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] reauth_time = 25920
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] rekey_time = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] over_time = 2880
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] rand_time = 2880
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] proposals = IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] local:
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] class = pre-shared key
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] id = %any
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] remote:
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] class = pre-shared key
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] id = %any
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] added vici connection: con1
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] installing 'con1_1'
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CFG] configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 06[CHD] CHILD_SA con1_1{1} state change: CREATED => ROUTED
                        Sep 27 14:02:22 charon 18669 08[CFG] vici client 2 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 13[CFG] vici client 3 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 11[CFG] vici client 3 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 11[CFG] vici client 3 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 3 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[NET] <1> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (168 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[ENC] <1> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[CFG] <1> looking for an IKEv1 config for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[IKE] <1> no IKE config found for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[ENC] <1> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2094589081 [ N(NO_PROP) ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[NET] <1> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (40 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:23 charon 18669 09[IKE] <1> IKE_SA (unnamed)[1] state change: CREATED => DESTROYING
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 05[CFG] vici client 4 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] vici client 4 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] vici client 4 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 4 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 16[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 190.13.88.176/32|/0 === 190.106.82.252/32|/0 with reqid {1}
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing ISAKMP_CERT_PRE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing MAIN_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing ISAKMP_CERT_POST task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing ISAKMP_NATD task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> queueing QUICK_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating ISAKMP_CERT_PRE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating MAIN_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating ISAKMP_CERT_POST task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating ISAKMP_NATD task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending XAuth vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending DPD vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> sending draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> initiating Main Mode IKE_SA con1[2] to 190.106.82.252
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 190.106.82.252[500] (180 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 190.106.82.252[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (104 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting proposal:
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposal matches
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> reinitiating already active tasks
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> MAIN_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 190.106.82.252[500] (244 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 190.106.82.252[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (304 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> received Cisco Unity vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> received DPD vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> received unknown vendor ID: 66:b8:7c:66:33:4d:e5:6f:8e:75:19:50:0a:be:07:71
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> received XAuth vendor ID
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> remote host is behind NAT
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> reinitiating already active tasks
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> MAIN_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[4500] to 190.106.82.252[4500] (76 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 190.106.82.252[4500] to 190.13.88.176[4500] (76 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] established between 190.13.88.176[190.13.88.176]...190.106.82.252[192.168.9.223]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> IKE_SA con1[2] state change: CONNECTING => ESTABLISHED
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> scheduling reauthentication in 25466s
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> maximum IKE_SA lifetime 28346s
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating QUICK_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposing traffic selectors for us:
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> 192.168.1.0/24|/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposing traffic selectors for other:
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> 192.168.6.0/24|/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating QUICK_MODE request 2208581255 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[4500] to 190.106.82.252[4500] (380 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> received packet: from 190.106.82.252[4500] to 190.13.88.176[4500] (332 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> parsed QUICK_MODE response 2208581255 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID N((24576)) ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting proposal:
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting proposal:
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> selecting proposal:
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> proposal matches
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CFG] <con1|2> selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1_1{2} state change: CREATED => INSTALLING
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> using AES_CBC for encryption
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> using HMAC_SHA1_96 for integrity
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> adding inbound ESP SA
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> SPI 0xcbe9ee0a, src 190.106.82.252 dst 190.13.88.176
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> adding outbound ESP SA
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> SPI 0x1488dc67, src 190.13.88.176 dst 190.106.82.252
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1_1{2} established with SPIs cbe9ee0a_i 1488dc67_o and TS 192.168.1.0/24|/0 === 192.168.6.0/24|/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[CHD] <con1|2> CHILD_SA con1_1{2} state change: INSTALLING => INSTALLED
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> reinitiating already active tasks
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> QUICK_MODE task
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[ENC] <con1|2> generating QUICK_MODE request 2208581255 [ HASH ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[NET] <con1|2> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[4500] to 190.106.82.252[4500] (60 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> activating new tasks
                        Sep 27 14:02:27 charon 18669 08[IKE] <con1|2> nothing to initiate
                        Sep 27 14:02:32 charon 18669 08[CFG] vici client 5 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:32 charon 18669 08[CFG] vici client 5 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:32 charon 18669 13[CFG] vici client 5 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:32 charon 18669 13[CFG] vici client 5 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 08[CFG] vici client 6 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 6 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 6 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 6 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[NET] <3> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (168 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[ENC] <3> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[CFG] <3> looking for an IKEv1 config for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[IKE] <3> no IKE config found for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[ENC] <3> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 3044333982 [ N(NO_PROP) ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[NET] <3> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (40 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:33 charon 18669 10[IKE] <3> IKE_SA (unnamed)[3] state change: CREATED => DESTROYING
                        Sep 27 14:02:37 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 7 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:37 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 7 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:37 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 7 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:37 charon 18669 05[CFG] vici client 7 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:42 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 8 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:42 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 8 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:42 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 8 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:42 charon 18669 15[CFG] vici client 8 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[NET] <4> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (168 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[ENC] <4> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[CFG] <4> looking for an IKEv1 config for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[IKE] <4> no IKE config found for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[ENC] <4> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 1107779914 [ N(NO_PROP) ]
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[NET] <4> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (40 bytes)
                        Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[IKE] <4> IKE_SA (unnamed)[4] state change: CREATED => DESTROYING
                        Sep 27 14:02:44 charon 18669 12[CFG] vici client 9 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:44 charon 18669 16[CFG] vici client 9 registered for: list-sa
                        Sep 27 14:02:44 charon 18669 13[CFG] vici client 9 requests: list-sas
                        Sep 27 14:02:44 charon 18669 16[CFG] vici client 9 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 09[CFG] vici client 10 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 10 requests: reload-settings
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 10[CFG] ipseckey plugin is disabled
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 10[CFG] loaded 0 entries for attr plugin configuration
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 10[CFG] loaded 0 RADIUS server configurations
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 05[CFG] vici client 10 disconnected
                        Sep 27 14:02:46 charon 18669 10[CFG] vici client 11 connected
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 05[CFG] vici client 11 requests: get-keys
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 11 requests: get-shared
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 05[CFG] vici client 11 requests: load-shared
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 05[CFG] loaded IKE shared key with id 'ike-0' for: '%any', '%any'
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 15[CFG] vici client 11 requests: load-shared
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 15[CFG] loaded IKE shared key with id 'ike-1' for: '%any', '%any'
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 11 requests: get-authorities
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 12[CFG] vici client 11 requests: get-pools
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 06[CFG] vici client 11 requests: get-conns
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] vici client 11 requests: load-conn
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] conn bypass:
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] child bypasslan:
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_time = 3600
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] life_time = 3960
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_time = 360
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_bytes = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] life_bytes = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_bytes = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_packets = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] life_packets = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_packets = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] updown = (null)
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] hostaccess = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] ipcomp = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mode = PASS
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] policies = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] policies_fwd_out = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dpd_action = none
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] start_action = trap
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] close_action = none
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] reqid = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] tfc = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] priority = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] interface = (null)
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mark_in = 0/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mark_in_sa = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mark_out = 0/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] set_mark_in = 0/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] set_mark_out = 0/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] label = (null)
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] label_mode = system
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] inactivity = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] proposals = ESP:AES_GCM_16_128/AES_GCM_16_192/AES_GCM_16_256/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/AES_XCBC_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local_ts = 192.168.1.0/24|/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote_ts = 192.168.1.0/24|/0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] hw_offload = no
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] sha256_96 = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] copy_df = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] copy_ecn = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] copy_dscp = out
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] version = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local_addrs = %any
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote_addrs = 127.0.0.1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local_port = 500
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote_port = 500
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] send_certreq = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] send_cert = CERT_SEND_IF_ASKED
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] ppk_id = (null)
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] ppk_required = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mobike = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] aggressive = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dscp = 0x00
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] encap = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dpd_delay = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dpd_timeout = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] fragmentation = 2
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] childless = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] unique = UNIQUE_NO
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] keyingtries = 1
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] reauth_time = 0
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_time = 14400
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] over_time = 1440
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_time = 1440
                        Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] proposals = IKE:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/AES_CTR_128/AES_CTR_192/AES_CTR_256/CAMELLIA_CBC_128/CAMELLIA_CBC_192/CAMELLIA_CBC_256/CAMELLIA_CTR_128/CAMELLIA_CTR_192/CAMELLIA_CTR_256/3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/AES_XCBC_96/AES_CMAC_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_512/PRF_AES128_XCBC/PRF_AES128_CMAC/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/ECP_256/ECP_384/ECP_521/ECP_256_BP/ECP_384_BP/ECP_512_BP/CURVE_25519/CURVE_448/MODP_3072/MODP_4096/MODP_6144/MODP_8192/MODP_2048, IKE:AES_GCM_16_128/AES_GCM_16_192/AES_GCM_16_256/AES_CCM_16_128/AES_CCM_16_192/AES_CCM_16_256/CHACHA20_POLY1305/AES_GCM_12_128/AES_GCM_12_192/AES_GCM_12_256/AES_GCM_8_128/AES_GCM_8_192/AES_GCM_8_256/AES_CCM_12_128/AES_CCM_12_192/AES_CCM_12_256/AES_CCM_8_128/AES_CCM_8_192/AES_CCM_8_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_512/PRF_AES128_XCBC/PRF_AES128_CMAC/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/ECP_256/ECP_384/ECP_521/ECP_256_BP/ECP_384_BP/ECP_512_BP/CURVE_25519/CURVE_448/MODP_3072/MODP_4096/MODP_6144/MODP_8192/MODP_2048

                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          @rmainero said in VPN point to point:

                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[NET] <4> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (168 bytes)
                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[ENC] <4> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V ]
                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[CFG] <4> looking for an IKEv1 config for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137
                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[IKE] <4> no IKE config found for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[ENC] <4> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 1107779914 [ N(NO_PROP) ]
                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[NET] <4> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (40 bytes)
                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[IKE] <4> IKE_SA (unnamed)[4] state change: CREATED => DESTROYING

                          So there it's failing from the other remote site. There is no matching P1. It looks like it doesn't exist or was disabled when that was logged.

                          But the connection from 190.106.82.252 connects correctly.

                          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            rmainero @rmainero
                            last edited by

                            @rmainero

                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] updated vici connection: bypass
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] vici client 11 requests: load-conn
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] conn con1:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] child con1_1:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_time = 3240
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] life_time = 3600
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_time = 360
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_bytes = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] life_bytes = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_bytes = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_packets = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] life_packets = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_packets = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] updown = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] hostaccess = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] ipcomp = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mode = TUNNEL
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] policies = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] policies_fwd_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dpd_action = trap
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] start_action = trap
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] close_action = none
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] reqid = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] tfc = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] priority = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] interface = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mark_in = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mark_in_sa = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mark_out = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] set_mark_in = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] set_mark_out = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] label = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] label_mode = system
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] inactivity = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] proposals = ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_192/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local_ts = 192.168.1.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote_ts = 192.168.6.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] hw_offload = no
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] sha256_96 = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] copy_df = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] copy_ecn = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] copy_dscp = out
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] version = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local_addrs = 190.13.88.176
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote_addrs = 190.106.82.252
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local_port = 500
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote_port = 500
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] send_certreq = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] send_cert = CERT_SEND_IF_ASKED
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] ppk_id = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] ppk_required = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] mobike = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] aggressive = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dscp = 0x00
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] encap = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dpd_delay = 10
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] dpd_timeout = 60
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] fragmentation = 2
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] childless = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] unique = UNIQUE_REPLACE
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] keyingtries = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] reauth_time = 25920
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rekey_time = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] over_time = 2880
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] rand_time = 2880
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] proposals = IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] local:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] class = pre-shared key
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] id = %any
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] remote:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] class = pre-shared key
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] id = %any
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 16[CFG] updated vici connection: con1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] vici client 11 requests: load-conn
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] conn con2:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] child con2_2:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rekey_time = 3240
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] life_time = 3600
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rand_time = 360
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rekey_bytes = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] life_bytes = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rand_bytes = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rekey_packets = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] life_packets = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rand_packets = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] updown = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] hostaccess = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] ipcomp = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] mode = TUNNEL
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] policies = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] policies_fwd_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] dpd_action = trap
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] start_action = trap
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] close_action = none
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] reqid = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] tfc = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] priority = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] interface = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] mark_in = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] mark_in_sa = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] mark_out = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] set_mark_in = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] set_mark_out = 0/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] label = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] label_mode = system
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] inactivity = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] proposals = ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] local_ts = 192.168.1.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] remote_ts = 192.168.0.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] hw_offload = no
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] sha256_96 = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] copy_df = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] copy_ecn = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] copy_dscp = out
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] version = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] local_addrs = 190.13.88.176
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] remote_addrs = 200.0.211.137
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] local_port = 500
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] remote_port = 500
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] send_certreq = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] send_cert = CERT_SEND_IF_ASKED
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] ppk_id = (null)
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] ppk_required = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] mobike = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] aggressive = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] dscp = 0x00
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] encap = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] dpd_delay = 10
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] dpd_timeout = 60
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] fragmentation = 2
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] childless = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] unique = UNIQUE_REPLACE
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] keyingtries = 1
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] reauth_time = 25920
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rekey_time = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] over_time = 2880
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] rand_time = 2880
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] proposals = IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] if_id_in = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] if_id_out = 0
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] local:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] class = pre-shared key
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] id = 190.13.88.176
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] remote:
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] class = pre-shared key
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] id = %any
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] added vici connection: con2
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] installing 'con2_2'
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CHD] CHILD_SA con2_2{3} state change: CREATED => ROUTED
                            Sep 27 14:02:47 charon 18669 13[CFG] vici client 11 disconnected
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 190.13.88.176/32|/0 === 200.0.211.137/32|/0 with reqid {2}
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> queueing ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> queueing ISAKMP_CERT_PRE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> queueing MAIN_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> queueing ISAKMP_CERT_POST task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> queueing ISAKMP_NATD task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> queueing QUICK_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> activating new tasks
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> activating ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> activating ISAKMP_CERT_PRE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> activating MAIN_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> activating ISAKMP_CERT_POST task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> activating ISAKMP_NATD task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> sending XAuth vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> sending DPD vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> sending FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> sending NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> sending draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> initiating Main Mode IKE_SA con2[5] to 200.0.211.137
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> IKE_SA con2[5] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[CFG] <con2|5> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[ENC] <con2|5> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[NET] <con2|5> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (180 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[NET] <con2|5> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (104 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[ENC] <con2|5> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> selecting proposal:
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> proposal matches
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> received proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> selected proposal: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> reinitiating already active tasks
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> MAIN_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[ENC] <con2|5> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[NET] <con2|5> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (244 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[NET] <con2|5> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (304 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[ENC] <con2|5> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> received Cisco Unity vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> received DPD vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[ENC] <con2|5> received unknown vendor ID: f6:12:19:19:29:d4:00:ce:f9:f8:75:e8:fb:7a:c1:38
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> received XAuth vendor ID
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> reinitiating already active tasks
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> ISAKMP_VENDOR task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> MAIN_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[ENC] <con2|5> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[NET] <con2|5> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (76 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[NET] <con2|5> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (76 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[ENC] <con2|5> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> IKE_SA con2[5] established between 190.13.88.176[190.13.88.176]...200.0.211.137[200.0.211.137]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> IKE_SA con2[5] state change: CONNECTING => ESTABLISHED
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> scheduling reauthentication in 23865s
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> maximum IKE_SA lifetime 26745s
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> activating new tasks
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> activating QUICK_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> proposing traffic selectors for us:
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> 192.168.1.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> proposing traffic selectors for other:
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> 192.168.0.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[ENC] <con2|5> generating QUICK_MODE request 3604667016 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[NET] <con2|5> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (316 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[NET] <con2|5> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (332 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[ENC] <con2|5> parsed QUICK_MODE response 3604667016 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID N((24576)) ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> selecting proposal:
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> proposal matches
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CFG] <con2|5> selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> CHILD_SA con2_2{4} state change: CREATED => INSTALLING
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> using AES_CBC for encryption
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> using HMAC_SHA1_96 for integrity
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> adding inbound ESP SA
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> SPI 0xcdefa9e6, src 200.0.211.137 dst 190.13.88.176
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> adding outbound ESP SA
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> SPI 0xda4172de, src 190.13.88.176 dst 200.0.211.137
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> CHILD_SA con2_2{4} established with SPIs cdefa9e6_i da4172de_o and TS 192.168.1.0/24|/0 === 192.168.0.0/24|/0
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[CHD] <con2|5> CHILD_SA con2_2{4} state change: INSTALLING => INSTALLED
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> reinitiating already active tasks
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> QUICK_MODE task
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[ENC] <con2|5> generating QUICK_MODE request 3604667016 [ HASH ]
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[NET] <con2|5> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (60 bytes)
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> activating new tasks
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 10[IKE] <con2|5> nothing to initiate
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 12[CFG] vici client 12 connected
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 15[CFG] vici client 12 registered for: list-sa
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 15[CFG] vici client 12 requests: list-sas
                            Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 15[CFG] vici client 12 disconnected

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              rmainero @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 said in VPN point to point:

                              So there it's failing from the other remote site. There is no matching P1. It looks like it doesn't exist or was disabled when that was logged.

                              But the connection from 190.106.82.252 connects correctly.

                              I think the problem is in the Pfsense, because if I deactivate the points and activate them, everything returns to normal, it is like there is something that does not finish going down in the pfsense

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Well there is no error shown in that latest log. It connects at P1 and P2 as expected.

                                What was the tunnel state in pfSense when you saw the previous error?

                                Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[CFG] <4> looking for an IKEv1 config for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137
Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[IKE] <4> no IKE config found for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

                                It's not even seeing the P1 as matching the configured IPs/IDs there. Was the P1 disabled?

                                R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  This is the sort of thing that would be better handled in TAC though.

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    rmainero @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10 said in VPN point to point:

                                    This is the sort of thing that would be better handled in TAC though.

                                    To open a TAC do you have to pay support?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Yes, that requires a support subscription:
                                      https://www.netgate.com/support

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        rmainero @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10
                                        What I sent you today was the continuation of yesterday's log

                                        What you are surely seeing is the second connection, which I connect well

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          If nothing was changed in pfSense in between those connection attempts then the difference is that it succeeds when pfSense initiates the connection:

                                          Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> initiating Main Mode IKE_SA con2[5] to 200.0.211.137
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[IKE] <con2|5> IKE_SA con2[5] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[CFG] <con2|5> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[ENC] <con2|5> generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 09[NET] <con2|5> sending packet: from 190.13.88.176[500] to 200.0.211.137[500] (180 bytes)
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[NET] <con2|5> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (104 bytes)
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[ENC] <con2|5> parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V ]
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[IKE] <con2|5> received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> selecting proposal:
Sep 27 14:02:48 charon 18669 11[CFG] <con2|5> proposal matches

                                          But fails when the other side is initiating:

                                          Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[NET] <4> received packet: from 200.0.211.137[500] to 190.13.88.176[500] (168 bytes)
Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[ENC] <4> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V ]
Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[CFG] <4> looking for an IKEv1 config for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137
Sep 27 14:02:43 charon 18669 16[IKE] <4> no IKE config found for 190.13.88.176...200.0.211.137, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

                                          So there is probably some difference between the configs. For example if the other side is set to IKEv1or2 it may be defaulting to v2 when it proposes but allows v1 when pfSense proposes it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.