Always Wan-ip but gateway is 100% packet loss
-
@AcidSleeper said in Always Wan-ip but gateway is 100% packet loss:
and it work with a computer directly connected to it and also work with and asus router connected to it.
so when either of these devices are connected to it, what IP's are they assigned?
the ISP is giving you a DHCP address (right?) (Random or Static?), but the result of the setting are apparently different when pfSense is assigned vs. what the computer or Asus.
Compare them?(are they requiring a specific MAC address?)
Does the ISP also provide you IPV6 ? that shows as pending in your screen shot above.
if they do not provide IPv6 (might not be a bad, test anyway)
also clients going through the netgate are able browse internet?
Diagnostics -> Routes
The ISP assigned IP and gateway listed?
generally does it show all the IP addresses you expect ? -
@jrey said in Always Wan-ip but gateway is 100% packet loss:
so when either of these devices are connected to it, what IP's are they assigned?
My computer and Asus router are assigned diffrent ip-adresses.
the ISP is giving you a DHCP address (right?) (Random or Static?), but the result of the setting are apparently different when pfSense is assigned vs. what the computer or Asus.
Compare them?Yes, DHCP and Random. Cant find any differences. I have assigned another dns-server in ASUS-router like I do here in pfsense. other then that I dont know.
(are they requiring a specific MAC address?)
No.
Does the ISP also provide you IPV6 ? that shows as pending in your screen shot above.
if they do not provide IPv6 (might not be a bad, test anyway)They dont and I have that removed in the last screenshot.
also clients going through the netgate are able browse internet?
Think you misunderstood me here. I cant access the internet when gateway is 100% packet loss. It is when gateway is Online I can surf etc.
-
Diagnostics -> Routes
The ISP assigned IP and gateway listed?
generally does it show all the IP addresses you expect ? -
Here I did a Status - Interfaces: Release Wan and the checkbox with Relinquish Lease Checked.
Then I in Command Promt I wrote: "ifconfig igc0 down" waited lets say 20seconds and then typed "ifconfig igc0 up"I had internet, gateway was online. But when I rebooted the result was 100% packet loss.
Dec 1 14:42:21 php-fpm 399 /status_interfaces.php: The command '/usr/local/sbin/dhclient {$ipv} -d -r -lf '/var/db/dhclient.leases.igc0' -cf '/var/etc/dhclient_wan.conf' -sf '/usr/local/sbin/pfSense-dhclient-script'' returned exit code '1', the output was 'Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client 4.4.3-P1 Copyright 2004-2022 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/ /var/db/dhclient.leases.igc0 line 4: expecting lease declaration. next-server ^ /var/db/dhclient.leases.igc0 line 5: expecting semicolon. option ^ /var/db/dhclient.leases.igc0 line 18: expecting lease declaration. next-server ^ /var/db/dhclient.leases.igc0 line 19: expecting semicolon. option ^ Listening on BPF/igc0/60:be:b4:02:e3:42 Sending on BPF/igc0/60:be:b4:02:e3:42 Can't attach interface {} to bpf device /dev/bpf0: Device not configured If you think you have received this message due to a bug rather than a configuration issue please read the section on submitting bugs on either our web page at www.isc.org or in the README file before submitting a bug. These pages explain the proper process and the information we find helpful for debugging. exiting.' Dec 1 14:42:24 php-fpm 399 /status_interfaces.php: Resyncing OpenVPN instances for interface WAN. Dec 1 14:42:24 check_reload_status 439 Reloading filter Dec 1 14:42:24 php-fpm 399 /status_interfaces.php: Gateway, none 'available' for inet, use the first one configured. 'WAN_DHCP' Dec 1 14:42:24 php-fpm 399 /status_interfaces.php: The command '/sbin/route -n6 get 'default' 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/egrep 'flags: <.*PROTO.*>'' returned exit code '1', the output was '' Dec 1 14:42:24 check_reload_status 439 Starting packages Dec 1 14:42:25 php-fpm 43555 /rc.start_packages: Restarting/Starting all packages. Dec 1 14:43:43 kernel igc0: link state changed to DOWN Dec 1 14:43:43 check_reload_status 439 Linkup starting igc0 Dec 1 14:43:44 php-fpm 43555 /rc.linkup: Hotplug event detected for WAN(wan) dynamic IP address (4: dhcp) Dec 1 14:43:44 php-fpm 43555 /rc.linkup: DEVD Ethernet detached event for wan Dec 1 14:43:44 check_reload_status 439 Reloading filter Dec 1 14:43:44 rc.gateway_alarm 6428 >>> Gateway alarm: WAN_DHCP (Addr:192.121.XXX.1 Alarm:down RTT:0ms RTTsd:0ms Loss:100%) Dec 1 14:43:44 check_reload_status 439 updating dyndns WAN_DHCP Dec 1 14:43:44 check_reload_status 439 Restarting IPsec tunnels Dec 1 14:43:44 check_reload_status 439 Restarting OpenVPN tunnels/interfaces Dec 1 14:43:44 check_reload_status 439 Reloading filter Dec 1 14:43:45 php-fpm 400 /rc.openvpn: Gateway, none 'available' for inet, use the first one configured. 'WAN_DHCP' Dec 1 14:43:45 php-fpm 400 /rc.openvpn: The command '/sbin/route -n6 get 'default' 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/egrep 'flags: <.*PROTO.*>'' returned exit code '1', the output was '' Dec 1 14:43:47 check_reload_status 439 Linkup starting igc0 Dec 1 14:43:47 kernel igc0: link state changed to UP Dec 1 14:43:48 php-fpm 400 /rc.linkup: Hotplug event detected for WAN(wan) dynamic IP address (4: dhcp) Dec 1 14:43:48 php-fpm 400 /rc.linkup: DEVD Ethernet attached event for wan Dec 1 14:43:48 php-fpm 400 /rc.linkup: HOTPLUG: Configuring interface wan Dec 1 14:43:48 check_reload_status 439 rc.newwanip starting igc0 Dec 1 14:43:48 php-fpm 400 /rc.linkup: Gateway, none 'available' for inet, use the first one configured. 'WAN_DHCP' Dec 1 14:43:48 php-fpm 400 /rc.linkup: The command '/sbin/route -n6 get 'default' 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/egrep 'flags: <.*PROTO.*>'' returned exit code '1', the output was '' Dec 1 14:43:48 check_reload_status 439 Restarting IPsec tunnels Dec 1 14:43:48 check_reload_status 439 updating dyndns wan Dec 1 14:43:48 check_reload_status 439 Reloading filter Dec 1 14:43:49 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: rc.newwanip: Info: starting on igc0. Dec 1 14:43:49 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: rc.newwanip: on (IP address: 192.121.XXX.95) (interface: WAN[wan]) (real interface: igc0). Dec 1 14:43:50 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: Removing static route for monitor 8.8.8.8 and adding a new route through 192.121.XXX.1 Dec 1 14:43:50 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: Gateway, NONE AVAILABLE Dec 1 14:43:50 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: The command '/sbin/route -n6 get 'default' 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/egrep 'flags: <.*PROTO.*>'' returned exit code '1', the output was '' Dec 1 14:43:50 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: IP Address has changed, killing states on former IP Address 0.0.0.0. Dec 1 14:43:50 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: Resyncing OpenVPN instances for interface WAN. Dec 1 14:43:50 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: Creating rrd update script Dec 1 14:43:52 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: pfSense package system has detected an IP change or dynamic WAN reconnection - 0.0.0.0 -> 192.121.XXX.95 - Restarting packages. Dec 1 14:43:52 check_reload_status 439 Starting packages Dec 1 14:43:52 check_reload_status 439 Reloading filter Dec 1 14:43:54 php-fpm 400 /rc.start_packages: Restarting/Starting all packages. Dec 1 14:44:48 php-fpm 43555 /diag_reboot.php: Stopping all packages. Dec 1 14:44:51 reboot 10265 rebooted by root Dec 1 14:44:51 syslogd exiting on signal 15 Dec 1 14:45:34 syslogd kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel ---<<BOOT>>--- Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc0: <Intel(R) Ethernet Controller I225-V> mem 0x50a00000-0x50afffff,0x50b00000-0x50b03fff at device 0.0 on pci2 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc0: Using 1024 TX descriptors and 1024 RX descriptors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc0: Using 2 RX queues 2 TX queues Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc0: Using MSI-X interrupts with 3 vectors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc0: Ethernet address: 60:be:b4:02:e3:42 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc0: netmap queues/slots: TX 2/1024, RX 2/1024 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc1: <Intel(R) Ethernet Controller I225-V> mem 0x50800000-0x508fffff,0x50900000-0x50903fff at device 0.0 on pci3 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc1: Using 1024 TX descriptors and 1024 RX descriptors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc1: Using 2 RX queues 2 TX queues Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc1: Using MSI-X interrupts with 3 vectors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc1: Ethernet address: 60:be:b4:02:e3:43 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc1: netmap queues/slots: TX 2/1024, RX 2/1024 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc2: <Intel(R) Ethernet Controller I225-V> mem 0x50600000-0x506fffff,0x50700000-0x50703fff at device 0.0 on pci4 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc2: Using 1024 TX descriptors and 1024 RX descriptors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc2: Using 2 RX queues 2 TX queues Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc2: Using MSI-X interrupts with 3 vectors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc2: Ethernet address: 60:be:b4:02:e3:44 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc2: netmap queues/slots: TX 2/1024, RX 2/1024 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc3: <Intel(R) Ethernet Controller I225-V> mem 0x50400000-0x504fffff,0x50500000-0x50503fff at device 0.0 on pci5 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc3: Using 1024 TX descriptors and 1024 RX descriptors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc3: Using 2 RX queues 2 TX queues Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc3: Using MSI-X interrupts with 3 vectors Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc3: Ethernet address: 60:be:b4:02:e3:45 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel igc3: netmap queues/slots: TX 2/1024, RX 2/1024 Dec 1 14:45:34 kernel lo0: link state changed to UP Dec 1 14:45:38 check_reload_status 439 Linkup starting igc0 Dec 1 14:45:38 kernel igc0: link state changed to UP Dec 1 14:45:38 check_reload_status 439 rc.newwanip starting igc0 Dec 1 14:45:38 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: Resyncing OpenVPN instances. Dec 1 14:45:39 kernel pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled Dec 1 14:45:39 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: Removing static route for monitor 8.8.8.8 and adding a new route through 192.121.XXX.1 Dec 1 14:45:39 kernel .done. Dec 1 14:45:39 kernel done. Dec 1 14:45:39 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: Gateway, NONE AVAILABLE Dec 1 14:45:39 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: Default gateway setting Interface WAN_DHCP Gateway as default. Dec 1 14:45:39 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: The command '/sbin/route -n6 get 'default' 2>/dev/null | /usr/bin/egrep 'flags: <.*PROTO.*>'' returned exit code '1', the output was '' Dec 1 14:45:39 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: rc.newwanip: Info: starting on igc0. Dec 1 14:45:39 kernel done. Dec 1 14:45:39 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: rc.newwanip: on (IP address: 192.121.XXX.95) (interface: WAN[wan]) (real interface: igc0). Dec 1 14:45:39 php-fpm 399 /rc.newwanip: Removing static route for monitor 8.8.8.8 and adding a new route through 192.121.XXX.1 Dec 1 14:45:39 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: sync unbound done. Dec 1 14:45:39 kernel done. Dec 1 14:45:39 kernel done. Dec 1 14:45:42 rc.gateway_alarm 86534 >>> Gateway alarm: WAN_DHCP (Addr:8.8.8.8 Alarm:1 RTT:7.380ms RTTsd:0ms Loss:50%) Dec 1 14:45:42 check_reload_status 439 updating dyndns WAN_DHCP Dec 1 14:45:42 check_reload_status 439 Restarting IPsec tunnels Dec 1 14:45:42 check_reload_status 439 Restarting OpenVPN tunnels/interfaces Dec 1 14:45:42 check_reload_status 439 Reloading filter Dec 1 14:45:43 check_reload_status 439 Linkup starting igc1 Dec 1 14:45:43 kernel igc1: link state changed to UP Dec 1 14:45:44 php-fpm 400 /rc.linkup: Ignoring link event during boot sequence. Dec 1 14:46:10 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: NTPD is starting up. Dec 1 14:46:10 kernel done. Dec 1 14:46:11 kernel done. Dec 1 14:46:11 check_reload_status 439 Updating all dyndns Dec 1 14:46:11 php-cgi 474 rc.bootup: The command '/usr/local/sbin/strongswanrc stop' returned exit code '1', the output was 'strongswan not running? (check /var/run/daemon-charon.pid).' Dec 1 14:46:11 kernel .done. Dec 1 14:46:17 php-fpm 400 /rc.start_packages: Restarting/Starting all packages. Dec 1 14:46:17 root 96391 Bootup complete
-
The answer has to be right there, but I'm not spotting it.
Reviewing everything you have provided, and just noticed another rule, that is not out of box on the LAN tab. for the IPv4 you have * (any) for source, out of box this would be "LAN subnets" like the IPv6 rule below it. Should not make a difference (but I didn't test it) so more just an observation at this point.
as it sits right now, your WAN IP is 192.121.xx.95 and the gateway should be 192.121.x.1
from the Diagnostics / Ping page can you ping both of those and get a response?
-
@jrey I change the rule as you requested.
I will try and ping theese ip tomorrow. The whole family is using the Internet as the Asus-router is plugged in the Wan-port of the mediaconverter right now.
I will return tomorrow! Thanks for all the troubleshooting so far!
-
Of course - no problem.
What other packages if any do you have installed and running?
After a reboot any services showing as not running?
-
My test machine is a virtual, so I can virtually mess with it.
so the system is currently running and an I disconnect the WAN Cable.
Note the system does not say OffLine -- the gateway just goes Pending and Unknown -what I'd expect ..
The interface is autoselect. (should be)
virtually plug it back in and it instantly negotiates the connection.
are you using the same cable when going from
mc <-> asus
as you do when going from
mc <-> pf
if it is the same cable that's fine, but if different (and even if not) are you getting the same negotiated speed/duplex on both devices (asus and pf)
do you need to restart the MC (or should you?) or just swapping the cable?curiosity questions
-
First answear your questions:
-
its the same cabel and Im getting 1000baseT from Wan. My laptop is old so it only got 100baseTX. I also have changed tha cabel from Cat5, Cat5e and Cat6 and different lengths.
-
When I remove the cabel the gateway goes to Pending and Unknown. Like yours.
-
I got no installed packages except Watchdog.
My morning work:
I couldnt sleep so at 06:00 I had an idea.What if the mediaconverter (Inteno) cant handle more than a couple of mac-adresses, and its locked at my Asus and my computer that has been connected recently to the mediaconverter before my pfsense-box.
Cant hurt to try: So I connected my computer, got an IP and with commandpromt I wrote "ipconfig /release". No ip and removed the Wan-cabel from my computer.
Started up my pfsense without wan-cabel and had it running when I put the wan-cabel in the pfsense-box. Voila! Gateway Online.
But have to try a reboot. No problems there.
But have to try and removed the wan-cabel and place it back in. No problems here either.Is it this that have been the problem the whole time. Some kind of macadress-lock? What do you think?
BUT I called to soon, there is still some problem. Had 4hours to play around. I remove the cabel and then I dont get gateway online again when I place it back in. I do it again and Gateway says Online.
But I cant browse the internet.
From pfsense I can ping and do traceroutes from ip-adresses and www-adresses. But if I try to browse the internet it wont work. I reboot, gateway Online but no internet. Remove the cabel again and plug in back in. Gateway is Online but no Internet. Can ping etc. DO a reboot again, no change except gateway offline. Another reboot and gateway online and I can browse the Internet.Something is very strange.
-
-
@jrey forgot to reply to you in my above post.
When I reboot without Wan-cable in the pfsense it boots up without running the dpinger in services, it is "stopped".
So when I plug in my wan-cable everything works. Is dpinger the fault?
-
2 items, MAC and Watchdog. (try watchdog change first)
MAC
so then (are they requiring a specific MAC address?)rephrase that to be ia the MediaConverter requiring a specific MAC.
just so there is no confusion about which device possibly requiring it.of course you can just tell pfSense to use the same MAC as the asus. if you want.
record the MAC addy the asus is using to connect to the MC.
enter that on the WAN screen. (sorry screen capture is from my production so forget that it says Static IP, (leave yours at DHCP)
Watchdog. "Service_Watchdog"? it will conflict with dpinger that monitors the connection. if that is the only package/service you have installed just remove WD. I have a few packages/Services running on Prod, and have never found the need to run WD, so not even installed here.
-
WatchDog removed and rebooted twice. No change.
I have tried the Mac-spoofing before. Didnt make a change either. Tried it again. Rebooted. Nope.
-
@AcidSleeper said in Always Wan-ip but gateway is 100% packet loss:
rebooted twice.
rebooted what? possible both devices need a power cycle.
MC first, give it time to start up, then pfSense
from your "can't sleep" post above it appears it was working? (or am I in need of more coffee and reading that wrong)
then let's look at a current set of logs from that sequence.
what's the make/model of the network card in the pfSense box?
-
@jrey said in Always Wan-ip but gateway is 100% packet loss:
rebooted what? possible both devices need a power cycle.
MC first, give it time to start up, then pfSense
Done that. Still no change.
from your "can't sleep" post above it appears it was working? (or am I in need of more coffee and reading that wrong)
Yes it was working and have been working but a reboot can make it go away any second.
then let's look at a current set of logs from that sequence.
To bad the logs from that time is long gone. Only 500 rows in log. =/
what's the make/model of the network card in the pfSense box?
Its 4x Intel i225-V 2.5Gbs
-
@jrey I have now attached my asus router to MC and pfsense to asus.
MC --> Asus --> Pfsense.
It seems like it can handle everything I do to it. Reboots, remove wan-cable (pfsense/asus), reboot without wan-cable and attach it when pfsense is up and running.
Every time the gateway goes online and I can browse the internet.
Talked to my ISP and they say the only setting I need to do is DHCP. Nothing else and I even mentioned that Im using pfsense but no settings for pfsense either.
-
Interesting
so this the summaryMC - Asus works
MC - pfSense fails
MC - Asus - pfSense worksit's almost like the network card in the pfSense is not compatible with the MC (similar cases have been noted)
do you have a small hub/switch that you can put between the MC and pfSense to test?
-
@jrey Yes I have a dumb switch that I can place in between. Will try that as soon as family leaves me alone with the internet! =)
Thanks yet again.
-
@jrey Hey, tried with a dumb switch (TP-Link SG105) between pfsense and Inteno (MC) but no change. Same behavior. Its like the hardware inside Pfsense cant tolerate (I know, I cant tolerate some people sometimes either) the Inteno relaying DHCP OR my ISP dhcp to Pfsense. I dont know, just throwing out ideas.
Here are som logs anyways:
-
Logs from General and DHCP - pfsense-random logs.txt
-
Log from General, show booting, no Internet, pull wan-cabel, plug it back in and got Internet (full functionality - pfsense-Boot-NoInternet-Internet.txt
-
-
So there have been a bunch of previous discussions about the I225-V
needing certain hardware revisions (you can search the forum for those)setting parameters (
Disable hardware checksum offload
Disable hardware TCP segmentation offload
Disable hardware large receive offload
)patches etc (all patches I would have thought are in 2.7.1 )
I don't have one and isn't an option for me to emulate, so..
you might want to run this on a command prompt
pciconf -vl
I'm not seeing an error on the icg loads however.
The boot sequence does imply you are getting an IP (.21) in that sequence and gateway (.1)the .2 and .3 DHCP sequence seems odd, (the sequence at 7:43 is one example)
although it appears you get a OFFER from .2 and .3 after several DHCPNAK from .3 - .2 is always giving you the IP. -
@jrey said in Always Wan-ip but gateway is 100% packet loss:
So there have been a bunch of previous discussions about the I225-V
needing certain hardware revisions (you can search the forum for those)setting parameters (
Disable hardware checksum offload
Disable hardware TCP segmentation offload
Disable hardware large receive offload
)Didnt have "Disable hardware checksum offload" crossed. A friend also said that and I have tried that before but not with a dumb switch. Now it is CHECKED. Will try again with a dumb switch in between Inteno and Pfsense.
patches etc (all patches I would have thought are in 2.7.1 )
I don't have one and isn't an option for me to emulate, so..
I have read much of it too but it seems like the Intel i225-V is working with pfsense 2.7.1, according to what I read. But maybe I am the exception!
you might want to run this on a command prompt
pciconf -vl
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x060000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x9a04 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x9a78 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x2212 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP GT2 [UHD Graphics G4]' class = display subclass = VGA none0@pci0:0:4:0: class=0x118000 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x9a03 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'TigerLake-LP Dynamic Tuning Processor Participant' class = dasp pcib1@pci0:0:6:0: class=0x060400 rev=0x01 hdr=0x01 vendor=0x8086 device=0x9a09 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '11th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI xhci0@pci0:0:13:0: class=0x0c0330 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x9a13 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP Thunderbolt 4 USB Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB xhci1@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x0c0330 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0ed subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP USB 3.2 Gen 2x1 xHCI Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB none1@pci0:0:20:2: class=0x050000 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0ef subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP Shared SRAM' class = memory subclass = RAM none2@pci0:0:22:0: class=0x078000 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0e0 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP Management Engine Interface' class = simple comms ahci0@pci0:0:23:0: class=0x010601 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0d3 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP SATA Controller' class = mass storage subclass = SATA pcib2@pci0:0:28:0: class=0x060400 rev=0x20 hdr=0x01 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0bc subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP PCI Express Root Port' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib3@pci0:0:28:5: class=0x060400 rev=0x20 hdr=0x01 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0bd subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tigerlake PCH-LP PCI Express Root Port' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib4@pci0:0:28:6: class=0x060400 rev=0x20 hdr=0x01 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0be subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP PCI Express Root Port' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib5@pci0:0:28:7: class=0x060400 rev=0x20 hdr=0x01 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0bf subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP PCI Express Root Port' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:0:31:0: class=0x060100 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa082 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP LPC Controller' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA hdac0@pci0:0:31:3: class=0x040300 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0c8 subvendor=0x10ec subdevice=0x3000 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP Smart Sound Technology Audio Controller' class = multimedia subclass = HDA ichsmb0@pci0:0:31:4: class=0x0c0500 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0a3 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP SMBus Controller' class = serial bus subclass = SMBus none3@pci0:0:31:5: class=0x0c8000 rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0xa0a4 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x7270 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Tiger Lake-LP SPI Controller' class = serial bus nvme0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x010802 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x126f device=0x2263 subvendor=0x126f subdevice=0x2263 vendor = 'Silicon Motion, Inc.' device = 'SM2263EN/SM2263XT SSD Controller' class = mass storage subclass = NVM igc0@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15f3 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Ethernet Controller I225-V' class = network subclass = ethernet igc1@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15f3 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Ethernet Controller I225-V' class = network subclass = ethernet igc2@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15f3 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Ethernet Controller I225-V' class = network subclass = ethernet igc3@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x020000 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15f3 subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0000 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Ethernet Controller I225-V' class = network subclass = ethernet
I'm not seeing an error on the icg loads however.
The boot sequence does imply you are getting an IP (.21) in that sequence and gateway (.1)the .2 and .3 DHCP sequence seems odd, (the sequence at 7:43 is one example)
although it appears you get a OFFER from .2 and .3 after several DHCPNAK from .3 - .2 is always giving you the IP.Did find out the my Asus is using dnsmasq and Pfsense if using Unbound. Just a thought. Can DNS Resolver (Unbound) be the problem that its no configured right or must I use DNS Forwarder?