Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel NIC I-226V

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    78 Posts 3 Posters 12.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Antibiotic @bmeeks
      last edited by Antibiotic

      @bmeeks I'm not sure , what you asking but running suricata on LAN only. Also have a on pfSense box 4th NIC's but working only 2 now ( one as WAN and second as LAN)

      pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
      CPU: Intel N100
      NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
      RAM : 16 GB DDR5
      Disk: 128 GB NVMe
      Brgds, Archi

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bmeeksB
        bmeeks
        last edited by

        What rules do you have enabled?

        Suricata should be able to obtain 1 Gigabit/sec performance using inline-IPS mode with most modern multicore CPUs and a decent multi-queue NIC. Perhaps your flavor of the I-226V NIC has an issue. How many netmap queues and slots show up from this command?

        grep /var/log/dmesg.boot netmap
        
        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          Antibiotic @bmeeks
          last edited by

          @bmeeks Suricata in IPS Policy Selection Balanced
          IPS Policy Mode Policy

          pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
          CPU: Intel N100
          NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
          RAM : 16 GB DDR5
          Disk: 128 GB NVMe
          Brgds, Archi

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            Antibiotic @bmeeks
            last edited by

            @bmeeks
            grep /var/log/dmesg.boot netmap
            grep: netmap: No such file or directory

            pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
            CPU: Intel N100
            NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
            RAM : 16 GB DDR5
            Disk: 128 GB NVMe
            Brgds, Archi

            bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • bmeeksB
              bmeeks @Antibiotic
              last edited by

              @Antibiotic said in Intel NIC I-226V:

              @bmeeks
              grep /var/log/dmesg.boot netmap
              grep: netmap: No such file or directory

              I'm sorry. I had the terms reversed. Use this command:

              grep netmap /var/log/dmesg.boot
              
              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                Antibiotic @bmeeks
                last edited by

                @bmeeks
                igc0: netmap queues/slots: TX 4/1024, RX 4/1024
                igc1: netmap queues/slots: TX 4/1024, RX 4/1024
                igc2: netmap queues/slots: TX 4/1024, RX 4/1024
                igc3: netmap queues/slots: TX 4/1024, RX 4/1024

                pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                CPU: Intel N100
                NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                Brgds, Archi

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bmeeksB
                  bmeeks
                  last edited by

                  You can try switching the runmode to workers on the INTERFACE SETTINGS tab in Suricata. Restart Suricata after making that change.

                  If that does not increase performance to where you want it, then you will just have to be content with using Legacy Blocking Mode and abandon Inline IPS Mode. There is really nothing else you can do.

                  A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    Antibiotic @bmeeks
                    last edited by

                    @bmeeks
                    runmode to workers set from beginning , so only option for legacy mode as understood ((((

                    pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                    CPU: Intel N100
                    NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                    RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                    Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                    Brgds, Archi

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      Antibiotic @bmeeks
                      last edited by Antibiotic

                      @bmeeks
                      Should I'm remove from sysctl netmap native mode option if suricata set to legacy mode or ntopng still can use this? I will try asking FreeBSD forum , could some tip give me regarding tuning netmap in native mode.

                      pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                      CPU: Intel N100
                      NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                      RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                      Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                      Brgds, Archi

                      bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • bmeeksB
                        bmeeks @Antibiotic
                        last edited by bmeeks

                        @Antibiotic said in Intel NIC I-226V:

                        @bmeeks
                        Should I'm remove from sysctl netmap native mode option if suricata set to legacy mode or ntopng still can use this? I will try asking FreeBSD forum , could some tip give me regarding tuning netmap in native mode.

                        ntopng does not use netmap at all in FreeBSD.

                        Suricata does not use netmap when operating in Legacy Blocking Mode. It uses libpcap instead. And when using netmap with Inline IPS Mode, Suricata will only allow you to select Inline mode if your NIC supports native operation. The GUI code will not allow you to choose netmap operation for a network adapter that requires emulated mode. Therefore, setting emulated mode or native mode is worthless in pfSense when configuring for Suricata.

                        Remove any customization you did with netmap tunables. They are not necessary and may actually do more harm than good in your situation.

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • A
                          Antibiotic @bmeeks
                          last edited by

                          @bmeeks Ok thank's

                          pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                          CPU: Intel N100
                          NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                          RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                          Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                          Brgds, Archi

                          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            Antibiotic @Antibiotic
                            last edited by

                            @Antibiotic Like understood from this conversation my NIC ( INTEL I-226V) have a problem with driver of netmap in FreeBSD . Is it correct?

                            pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                            CPU: Intel N100
                            NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                            RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                            Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                            Brgds, Archi

                            A bmeeksB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              Antibiotic @Antibiotic
                              last edited by

                              @Antibiotic The last question , can than to set Hardware Checksum Offloading ON back if suricata use legacy mode?

                              pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                              CPU: Intel N100
                              NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                              RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                              Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                              Brgds, Archi

                              bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • bmeeksB
                                bmeeks @Antibiotic
                                last edited by

                                @Antibiotic said in Intel NIC I-226V:

                                @Antibiotic Like understood from this conversation my NIC ( INTEL I-226V) have a problem with driver of netmap in FreeBSD . Is it correct?

                                Perhaps. Hard to say without knowing the exact firmware revision and then doing research on that firmware against the current driver code in FreeBSD. Most all NICs these days in FreeBSD utilize the iflib abstraction layer.

                                I'm not a NIC hardware expert.

                                I takes a lot of processing power to get line rate inline IPS performance with a large rule set. You want an RSS-enabled kernel, a server class multi-queue NIC, and a very fast and high core count CPU. Plenty of Suricata users out there are getting 3 to 4 Gigabit/sec IPS performance, but they have server class hardware doing that without any other package running on the box. And these are also usually Linux-based firewalls.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • bmeeksB
                                  bmeeks @Antibiotic
                                  last edited by

                                  @Antibiotic said in Intel NIC I-226V:

                                  @Antibiotic The last question , can than to set Hardware Checksum Offloading ON back if suricata use legacy mode?

                                  No!! That mode will confuse the detection engine. When using IDS/IPS, leave all hardware offloading features disabled.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • A
                                    Antibiotic @bmeeks
                                    last edited by Antibiotic

                                    @bmeeks
                                    Oh ok, out from home users in-line mode, i guess)))

                                    pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                                    CPU: Intel N100
                                    NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                                    RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                                    Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                                    Brgds, Archi

                                    bmeeksB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      Well the fact you're not seeing the CPU cores pegged at 100% suggests there might be more available.

                                      The testing you have done points towards igc/netmap but I'd want to see something more positive before making any conclusions. It wouldn't be the first time something seemingly unrelated came into play.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • bmeeksB
                                        bmeeks @Antibiotic
                                        last edited by bmeeks

                                        @Antibiotic said in Intel NIC I-226V:

                                        @bmeeks
                                        Oh ok, out from home users in-line mode, i guess)))

                                        To be perfectly honest, Suricata has very limited usefulness at best in a home network. I am the creator of the package for pfSense, and I don't run it in my home network. I have not run an IDS/IPS in my home network for the last several years. And even when I did, it was only to collect some events in logs to aid me in debugging the package code or adding new features.

                                        Suricata cannot see into encrypted traffic, and 90% or more of typical network traffic now is encrypted (HTTPS, SMTPS, POP3S, IMAPS, DoT, DoH, TLS, etc.). Suricata is totally blind to the payloads of these encrypted packets.

                                        Much better security can be had by simply keeping internal hosts updated with the latest security hotfixes and running a good antivirus client on them along with just being careful what you click on as a user.

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A
                                          Antibiotic @bmeeks
                                          last edited by

                                          @bmeeks I think also to uninstall of suricata at home and set Hardware Checksum Offloading ON back for traffic shaping!

                                          pfSense plus 24.11 on Topton mini PC
                                          CPU: Intel N100
                                          NIC: Intel i-226v 4 pcs
                                          RAM : 16 GB DDR5
                                          Disk: 128 GB NVMe
                                          Brgds, Archi

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stephenw10S
                                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                            last edited by

                                            You don't need checksum off loading to run traffic shaping.

                                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.