Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    OpenSense on SG-2100

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    23 Posts 8 Posters 2.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by jimp

      If you absolutely have to have a proxy, you should setup a local proxy VM or system (or even a docker container) on a dedicated device instead of running it on your edge/firewall. You can still redirect traffic to it or configure clients to use it directly. I'd be surprised if it was doing as much for you as you think, especially on a 2100.

      Remember: Upvote with the πŸ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • M
        michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @bmeeks
        last edited by

        @bmeeks I think a value-add to the package is the MITM aspect. Unfortenly most if not all of the blocklists that were used for Squid are no longer or just not good when compared to commercial products.
        Im of two minds about it.
        Squid is an oldie but a goodie. It can still have some relevance today for page blocking or content control albeit in limited scope.If you have a proxy in the path, you cant bypass at all. DoH is a game of wack-a-mole. Easy to do but can be easily bypassed.

        Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
        Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
        Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
        Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
        JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @jimp
          last edited by

          @jimp
          This was suggested on Reddit and i think its a good idea if one has the resources.
          Squid with the unresolved CVEs is probably best sitting behind a firewall . I dunno. Just a thought.

          Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
          Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
          Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
          Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
          JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • S
            SteveITS Galactic Empire @JonathanLee
            last edited by

            @JonathanLee said in OpenSense on SG-2100:

            I want the web cache support for Squid is what I am after. I am going to be stuck in 23.05.01 land until the end of time.

            23.09 includes Squid per the blog post.

            re: cache, SSD is recommended for the disk writes on eMMC...
            https://www.netgate.com/supported-pfsense-plus-packages
            https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/troubleshooting/disk-lifetime.html

            Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
            When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
            Upvote πŸ‘ helpful posts!

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • S
              SteveITS Galactic Empire @SteveITS
              last edited by

              SSD

              @JonathanLee I see from one of your other posts you have a Max so never mind this comment. I like to post it when it comes up since many don't know about the recommendation list (which would help if it was in the docs, or linked from the docs; AFAIK it isn't).

              Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
              When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
              Upvote πŸ‘ helpful posts!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Indeed Squid is in 23.09. I agree though, running a separate internal proxy is probably a better option.

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @stephenw10
                  last edited by michmoor

                  @stephenw10
                  To be fair, commercial solutions like Cisco Umbrella or Zorus do a really better job at this whole proxy thing.
                  I know there isn’t a home lab or SMB pricing that makes sense which is really the pain point here for mostly everyone.
                  Also I’m not aware of any commercial proxy to be used internally. Is BlueCoat still a thing?

                  Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                  Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                  Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                  Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                  JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                  JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JonathanLeeJ
                    JonathanLee @michmoor
                    last edited by

                    @michmoor what is bluecoat? I have Squid 6.6 running great in 24 minor issue the status page changed to non squidclient based. But other than that it has a lot of the CVEs fixed I am told it’s the latest and greatest.

                    Make sure to upvote

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      If you want to proxy and filter all the traffic from/to a small country you call Bluecoat. πŸ˜‰

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @stephenw10
                        last edited by michmoor

                        @stephenw10
                        SWG are the future. Its been the future? Its here now :)

                        https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/access-management/what-is-a-secure-web-gateway/

                        Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                        Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                        Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                        Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                        JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          'SWG' seems like another acronym for what has been around for years. Maybe with a shinier front end glued onto it. πŸ˜‰

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10
                            lol oh for sure !

                            Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                            Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                            Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                            Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                            JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.