Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NTP Issue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    98 Posts 11 Posters 11.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      MatthewA1 @JonathanLee
      last edited by

      @JonathanLee Officially been 6 months since the last feedback I've gotten... PR is still open with the "Changes Requested" label applied even though I made the requested changes

      JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JonathanLeeJ
        JonathanLee @MatthewA1
        last edited by

        @MatthewA1 push it to the new development version see what happens, I think that older thread is not being looked at any longer

        Make sure to upvote

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          The PR is against master so that would be 2.8-dev at this point.

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            MatthewA1 @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 Should I have opened the PR against a branch for 2.7 when I first opened it instead of master? As of now, it is in the correct place though right?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Nope master is almost always the correct place because that's where all the development happens. It's much easier to merge and test stuff there.

              If it all works well, and there is cause to do so, it can be back ported to 2.7.X.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • A
                admacdo
                last edited by

                I'm still running 2.7.2 as everything else seems to be just fine, but things have changed on my network a while ago with yet another stratum 1 NTP server.
                I expect I won't be totally happy until I have four, but that will be risking death from my girlfriend, if she ever finds out.
                The number of NTP based clocks has also increased from one to four.
                I can recommend the "When" iottimer wifi clock from Aliexpress actually. Just follow the instructions about refreshing your browser window once you try changing it to English, or it won't appear to change.

                Anyway, the second NTP server has two interfaces which can be independently configured, so today I decided to fire up another firewall interface and allocate it a class B address and directly connect it to the second interface on the new NTP server.

                So now I have three local stratum 1 NTP sources configured. All NTP servers show the connections from the firewall on all three interfaces when it polls them every minute.

                As far as the firewall is concerned, they're pending/unreachable.
                For extra fun, the interface connected solely to the NTP second interface has an explicit permit any NTP rule.

                I even tried setting the second NTP server interface to broadcast mode. Zilch.

                It's disappointing as prior to 2.7.2, my firewall was sub millisecond synchronised.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Do you see replies back to the fire wall in the states? Or in a pcap?

                  A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    admacdo @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10
                    Nope.
                    Only the external NTP servers are seen and used.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      admacdo @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10
                      Might have helped to post this:

                      09:22:49.170320 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 28353, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0x8f85!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.006912, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801704.158000500 (2024-07-24T09:21:44Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801704.161610624 (2024-07-24T09:21:44Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801769.170296701 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.003610124
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +65.012296201
                      09:22:49.170381 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10031, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801769.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801769.170296701 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801769.167000500 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801769.167000500 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.003296201
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.003296201
                      09:22:57.187023 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 45902, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0x5082!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.007034, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801769.167000500 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801769.170386584 (2024-07-24T09:22:49Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801777.187008800 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.003386084
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +8.020008299
                      09:22:57.187083 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10032, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801777.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801777.187008800 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801777.183000500 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801777.183000500 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.004008300
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.004008300
                      09:23:05.179910 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 43251, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0x5129!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.007156, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801777.183000500 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801777.187088760 (2024-07-24T09:22:57Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801785.179879918 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.004088260
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +7.996879418
                      09:23:05.179988 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10033, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801785.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801785.179879918 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801785.176000500 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801785.176000500 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.003879418
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.003879418
                      09:24:11.223769 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 17146, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0x2cfc!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.008148, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801785.176000500 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801785.180030896 (2024-07-24T09:23:05Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801851.223755123 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.004030396
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +66.047754622
                      09:24:11.223843 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10034, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801851.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801851.223755123 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801851.220000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801851.220000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.003754622
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.003754622
                      09:24:19.195033 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 50821, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0xae46!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.008270, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801851.220000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801851.223882897 (2024-07-24T09:24:11Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801859.195007028 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.003882397
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +7.975006527
                      09:24:19.195121 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10035, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801859.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801859.195007028 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801859.192000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801859.192000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.003006528
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.003006528
                      09:24:27.176376 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 48593, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0x37e1!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.008392, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801859.192000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801859.195166604 (2024-07-24T09:24:19Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801867.176368362 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.003166103
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +7.984367861
                      09:24:27.176494 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10036, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801867.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801867.176368362 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801867.173000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801867.173000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.003367861
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.003367861
                      09:25:34.172849 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0xb8, ttl 64, id 10788, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.1.123 > 172.16.1.2.123: [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d -> 0x34ff!] NTPv4, Client, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 2 (secondary reference), poll 6 (64s), precision -23
                      Root Delay: 0.015640, Root dispersion: 0.009384, Reference-ID: 0x11fd4225
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801750.204506135 (2024-07-24T09:22:30Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801867.173000500 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801867.176498219 (2024-07-24T09:24:27Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801934.172838781 (2024-07-24T09:25:34Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: +0.003497719
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: +66.999838281
                      09:25:34.172908 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype ARP (0x0806), length 60: Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has 172.16.1.1 tell 172.16.1.2, length 46
                      09:25:34.172917 60:be:b4:07:c6:17 > a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb, ethertype ARP (0x0806), length 42: Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Reply 172.16.1.1 is-at 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, length 28
                      09:25:34.172956 a6:4c:5e:80:2e:fb > 60:be:b4:07:c6:17, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 90: (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 10037, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 76)
                      172.16.1.2.123 > 172.16.1.1.123: [udp sum ok] NTPv4, Server, length 48
                      Leap indicator: (0), Stratum 1 (primary reference), poll 0 (1s), precision -18
                      Root Delay: 0.000000, Root dispersion: 0.000000, Reference-ID: PPS^@
                      Reference Timestamp: 3930801934.000000000 (2024-07-24T09:25:34Z)
                      Originator Timestamp: 3930801934.172838781 (2024-07-24T09:25:34Z)
                      Receive Timestamp: 3930801934.169000500 (2024-07-24T09:25:34Z)
                      Transmit Timestamp: 3930801934.169000500 (2024-07-24T09:25:34Z)
                      Originator - Receive Timestamp: -0.003838281
                      Originator - Transmit Timestamp: -0.003838281

                      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @admacdo
                        last edited by

                        @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                        [bad udp cksum 0x5a6d

                        odd that all the traffic you send to 1.2 shows bad checksum??

                        But traffic from 1.2 to 1.1 shows ok?

                        Do you have your checksum offload on?

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          admacdo @johnpoz
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz
                          No checksum offload tick.

                          stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @admacdo
                            last edited by

                            @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                            No checksum offload tick.

                            'No tick' could imply it's not disabled and therefore is offloaded.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              admacdo @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10
                              Yeah, bad explanation on my part. It's not disabled.
                              I even cycled it on and off a few times with a reboot to see if it made any difference.

                              No change.

                              I'm a little disappointed.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                If it's actually disabled you can see that directly using ifconfig at the CLI, for example:

                                [24.08-DEVELOPMENT][admin@4200.stevew.lan]/root: ifconfig -m igc1
                                igc1: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1500
                                	options=48020b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                                	capabilities=4f43fbb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO,NETMAP,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                                

                                Where tx and rx checksums are shown in capabilities but not options. Though you see vlan checkums are still enabled.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A
                                  admacdo @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10

                                  Well, it looks like it's not disabled, as all previous indications have said that it isn't.

                                  igc2: flags=1008943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1500
                                  description: LAN
                                  options=4e020bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                                  capabilities=4f43fbb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,TSO6,LRO,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC,VLAN_HWTSO,NETMAP,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                                  ether 60:be:b4:07:c6:16
                                  inet 192.168.25.254 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.25.255
                                  inet6 fe80::62be:b4ff:fe07:c616%igc2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
                                  media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                                  status: active
                                  supported media:
                                  media autoselect
                                  media 2500Base-T
                                  media 1000baseT
                                  media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex
                                  media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
                                  media 100baseTX
                                  media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex
                                  media 10baseT/UTP
                                  nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Ok then the checksum failure in a pcap is expected. That isn't really a problem normally though.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A
                                      admacdo
                                      last edited by

                                      Well, just for more fun, a couple of weeks ago, I bought an SG-1100 as I needed a backup firewall in case mine self toasts somehow.
                                      I reset it to defaults, stuck a rough config on and as a quick test, pointed it at both my local NTP stratum one time servers and also time.apple.com.

                                      The apple timeserver responded instantly and the 1100 totally ignored the two locals.

                                      I updated it to the latest Pfsense Plus and the same thing happened.

                                      Today I was given a VK-T40E2 by a colleague who'd upgraded his home firewall setup.
                                      I reset it to defaults and configured it, then pointed it at the same three timeservers as the 1100.
                                      It instantly latched onto one of the locals while still seeing the other two.
                                      It was still on the original version, so I updated that to the latest legacy 2.3.5 (I think). Going further will require a complete reinstall and I don't have a null modem cable to hand these days.
                                      It still saw all the local and internet NTP servers that I cared to list.

                                      So of course, I can't wait to get it to 2.4 so that it can't see the two local stratum ones...
                                      At least that's what I'm betting will happen.

                                      GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • GertjanG
                                        Gertjan @admacdo
                                        last edited by Gertjan

                                        @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                                        The apple timeserver responded instantly and the 1100 totally ignored the two locals.

                                        It will put the other two as a 'hot spare'.
                                        Check for yourself (example) :

                                        a03b7889-a344-461d-80ea-fe3154d6cdeb-image.png

                                        Btw : look at that : NTP went IPv6 only also ...

                                        @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                                        I updated it to the latest Pfsense Plus

                                        24.11.

                                        @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                                        the same three timeservers

                                        Normally, you shouldn't use 3 'off something' (DNS, NTP, whatever) as it created problems.
                                        See it like this : you have to buy a new car, but you want to think about it, so your interrogations @home and discuss it with your wive.
                                        What would happen if you had 3 wives ?
                                        I can tell you what will happen. You won't drive any car any soon (you couldn't afford one anyway ^^)

                                        So :
                                        NTP : pick a 'pool'.
                                        DNS : stick to 'root servers' (a pool actually).
                                        etc etc.

                                        @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                                        latest legacy 2.3.5

                                        An APU ? 32 bits ??

                                        @admacdo said in NTP Issue:

                                        it to 2.4 so

                                        2.4 ?

                                        No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                        Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A
                                          admacdo @Gertjan
                                          last edited by

                                          @Gertjan

                                          1. Go and read the entire thread, start to finish. Pay particular attention to what I have already posted.
                                          2. Go and read how NTP actually works.
                                            Not SNTP.
                                            The REAL complete NTP and learn EXACTLY WHY you put in multiple NTP sources.
                                            Then maybe go and read why Industry Best Practice requires four.
                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • A
                                            admacdo @ARAMP1
                                            last edited by

                                            @ARAMP1

                                            And sadly, the issue still exists with 2.8

                                            There's just no way that I can find to get pfsense back to taking notice of any NTP servers on the LAN.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.