OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover
-
Ah, OK that's not the same then.
So do you have the server assigned as an interface?
Do you see the tunnel subnet in auto outbound NAT rules?
Which states are cleared?
If the server is running on the WAN directly I assume it's there only for access to the firewall itself. Rules passing traffic there should be set to not sync states since they would not be valid on the other node.
-
@stephenw10 Not the same as what? It is exactly the same issue @UserCo is experiencing.
If an OpenVPN server is bound to a wan interface, wan states are cleared if the service starts or stops after an interface change.@stephenw10 said in OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover:
So do you have the server assigned as an interface?
As stated before, there is not interface assigned for the ovpns currently for debugging, but this does not seem to make a difference.
@stephenw10 said in OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover:
Do you see the tunnel subnet in auto outbound NAT rules?
As stated before, we see the tunnel network on outbound NAT rules.
@stephenw10 said in OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover:
Which states are cleared?
At least all WAN states are cleared, we have not verified if really all states are cleared since it does not matter that much in our case.
@stephenw10 said in OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover:
If the server is running on the WAN directly I assume it's there only for access to the firewall itself. Rules passing traffic there should be set to not sync states since they would not be valid on the other node.
We have multiple OpenVPN server for different purposes, the ones that are directly bound to the native WAN interface are only for accessing the firewall itself.
We also have OpenVPN servers for other purposes that need to be on a carp ip. I am not worried about invalid states and that is not the issue here.Support suggested to bind the OpenVPN servers to localhost and then NAT from the carp ip/wan interface to localhost.
This "resolves" the issue that states are cleared during failover, but creates other unwanted sideeffects. -
@dkoruga @stephenw10 Thank you for the inputs. Yes for me it behaves exactly like @dkoruga describes. Is this a known Bug in Pfsense? what can I do about it? when I try the suggested workaround from you @dkoruga with having the OpenVPN server on localhost and doing the port forwarding, the failover does not break the states anymore but also the OpenVPN server does not send an exit notify to the clients so they don't try to reconnect. How do I get the Clients to reconnect? If that would work, I would be satisficed with this workaround as it ticks all the boxes.
What are the mentioned "other unwanted Sid effects"?
Thanks
-
@UserCo Netgate Support confirmed the issue we are seeing here is https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13569
First unwanted side effect is the missing exit notify during shutdown of the server as you mentioned.
In result you have to reduce the client ping timeout to a low value to make the client reconnect after some seconds.
Even if you put this as low as 1 or 2 seconds, with exit notification the failover is way more seamless for the client.Second is that ovpns will not see the real client ip without additional magic
Third there could be additional side effects if any packets are received by your inactive firewall node since this node will have the tunnel network in its routing table.
We are considering "commenting out the line /sbin/pfctl -i $1 -Fs in /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown" as mentioned as a workaround in the bug tracker since i can not imagine an unwanted state on this interface in our configuration, and if there is then i will make sure these states are not synced within our firewall rules in the first place.
@dkoruga said in OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover:
To me it looks like this is some wrapper handling bs but i cant find the script or function causing it.
It is funny how the line "/sbin/pfctl -i $1 -Fs in /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown" was my first suspicion 10 minutes into debugging and was then scrapped in my head as the variable is logged and when i tried to execute the command by hand 0 states were cleared as described in the bug tracker conversation.
-
@dkoruga Thanks a lot. This workaround worked for me.
-
@dkoruga said in OpenVPN interfering with CARP Failover:
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/13569
Hmm, interesting. Since you're not running it on the CARP VIP I wouldn't expect that to apply to you. I wouldn't have expected exit notification to apply either since the server running on the WAN IP would not shutdown. Unless it loses link entirely.
The server still sees the real source IP when you forward to localhost. There's no source NAT there.
Steve
-
@dkoruga I can confirm it still happens in 2.7.2 and the /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown fix worked for me.
Normal HA with OpenVPN in WAN CARP. Commenting the line made the trick -
I have a similar problem with carp and vpn, however I use the openvpn interface being a gateway group, being a gateway where carp is running the vpn does not connect, the other one that is outside carp is normal, the same case as comment Could the line solve this?
-
OpenVPN is part of a gateway group? On the gateway group? Unclear exactly how you have that setup.
-
@stephenw10 Good afternoon, I have a VPN in the following configuration.
In the System - Routing part it looks like this
(I don't know if the part where this ASLGW with the carp's IP is working, as it was due to some testing)In the export part, I put the IP of 1 interface as default and then in Additional configuration options (still in export) I put remote ip port udp4
How it works, the VPN tries to connect to the first IP and if it is out, it goes to another IP. This configuration may not be the best and there are better ones, but without the carp part it has always worked for me.
-
Hmm, OK. So what exactly are you seeing happen?
-
@stephenw10 When connecting to the link that operates with CARP, it doesn't work, it fails due to a TLS error, and goes to the next connection that works, I saw in the firewall logs that the connection "Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) was being blocked )", because it arrived at the firewall as the carp's IP, but the firewall's dealings were for the interface's IP, I made the change, but there was no result in connecting the VPN, I needed to generate a new VPN with the VPN's interface being the carp, this is the only way to connect to the vpn, but if I keep the 2 vpns, each one on 1 link would I be able to work with just 1 .ovpn file on the computer?
-
Was the primary gateway still up at that point?
This is a VPN server so it isn't connecting out it just listens for incoming connections. There is no reason it can't listen on both WANs all the time, no need to use a failover group there.
See: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/openvpn/multi-wan.html#port-forward-method
-
@stephenw10 Good afternoon, would you have an example of what this configuration would look like, I couldn't understand it.
-
Set the the OpenVPN server to listen on localhost.
Then setup port forwards on both WANs to localhost for the port the OpenVPN traffic is arriving on.
Clients will be able to connect to either WAN and replies will go back correctly.
