Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    System logs referencing old gateway

    Routing and Multi WAN
    3
    7
    306
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      srbol
      last edited by

      I'm new to pfsense and trying to address system logs that that reference an old gateway "ProtonVPN2."

      For example:

      Sep 18 15:55:25 php-fpm 41885 /rc.newwanip: The gateway: ProtonVPN2 is invalid or unknown, not using it.

      and

      Sep 18 15:55:23 php-fpm 91812 /rc.filter_configure_sync: The gateway: ProtonVPN2 is invalid or unknown, not using it.

      I deleted this gateway a month ago. I created it trying to setup a second VPN connection using WireGuard.

      I'm not exactly sure what these errors mean or how to address them.

      I found this thread that I think is related: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/187125/old-gw-still-referenced-in-logs

      I was not successful in using the command prompt. I also do not know how to edit a configuration file.

      Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your patience.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JonathanLeeJ
        JonathanLee
        last edited by

        Do you have an ACL or alias for it still?

        Make sure to upvote

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          srbol @JonathanLee
          last edited by

          @JonathanLee

          Thank you for your quick response!

          I do not think I have any alias that references ProtonVPN2.

          However, I looked through my firewall rules and found this:

          Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 5.13.12 AM.png

          Is the last rule the potential ACL you're referring to?

          Should I disable or delete the last rule?

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            SteveITS Galactic Empire @srbol
            last edited by

            @srbol Note how "ProtonVPN2" is not a link? That's because pfSense knows it is invalid. Yes you can disable or delete that rule. That should bypass the error, unless there's another.

            Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
            When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
            Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              srbol @SteveITS
              last edited by

              @SteveITS Thank you for pointing out that "ProtonVPN2" is not a link. That makes complete sense now.

              Earlier today, following your advice, I deleted the rule altogether. The rule was left over from my (failed) attempt to setup a second WireGuard VPN over a month ago.

              So far, I have seen no further errors noted in my system logs. I will continue to check over the next day or two and let you know if I see anything.

              Sincerely appreciate your willingness to help a noob like me.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • S
                SteveITS Galactic Empire @srbol
                last edited by

                @srbol said in System logs referencing old gateway:

                Thank you for pointing out that "ProtonVPN2" is not a link. That makes complete sense now.

                It does, in hindsight. :) Otherwise it's subtle. You're welcome, help someone else someday. :)

                Similar can trigger for, say, pfBlocker-created aliases, if the alias isn't created yet/doesn't load.

                Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • S
                  srbol @SteveITS
                  last edited by

                  @SteveITS Final update. The issue definitely seems resolved. Thanks again.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.