pfSense not enabling port
-
The status of the bridge device is not really important compared to that of the actual NIC. The bridge could appear up even if the NIC is not.
I would check the NIC stats and see if you see any incoming packets on it.
ip -s link show enp4s0f0
-
@georgelza said in pfSense not enabling port:
@Gblenn I figured i'd give the host a ip on the network the card lives.
i will then give the guest vm's their own ip's on that network also.can easily remove that 30.11
G
Leave all that to pfsense instead, that's where you want to control all those things, including all your static IP's. If you have set up the Unifi SFP+ port as VLAN 30 Untagged, then anything on the Proxmox side will of course get an IP from that range.
-
root@pmox1:~# ip -s link show enp4s0f0 6: enp4s0f0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master vmbr30 state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether a8:b8:e0:05:f0:91 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast 236040 3934 282 0 0 3934 TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns 11447434 67461 0 0 0 0 root@pmox1:~#
-
@stephenw10 It's already in the info pasted above, showing NO-CARRIER and DOWN so it doesn't seem to be working unfortunately...
-
I normally do dhcp reserve assignment on pfSense for all devices... aka control/manage i from that side.
G
-
Ah, yes. try:
ethtool enp4s0f0
-
@stephenw10 said in pfSense not enabling port:
ethtool enp4s0f0
root@pmox1:~# ethtool enp4s0f0 Settings for enp4s0f0: Supported ports: [ FIBRE ] Supported link modes: 10000baseT/Full Supported pause frame use: Symmetric Supports auto-negotiation: No Supported FEC modes: Not reported Advertised link modes: 10000baseT/Full Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Advertised auto-negotiation: No Advertised FEC modes: Not reported Speed: 10000Mb/s Duplex: Full Auto-negotiation: off Port: FIBRE PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Supports Wake-on: d Wake-on: d Current message level: 0x00000007 (7) drv probe link Link detected: yes root@pmox1:~#
-
@georgelza Yes, so no need to set the IP, it's one of the things that made me think it was working when I saw it...
So when you ping from Proxmox, I guess in this case you were pinging inside the virtual switch of Proxmox and got that ICMP response. Meaning it never left Promxox...
And when you then ping from the PC, you can see that it times out. The response from 172.16.30.1 comes from pfsense obviously.
-
and from the logs
Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: vmbr30: port 1(enp4s0f0) entered disabled state Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: vmbr30: port 1(enp4s0f0) entered blocking state Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: vmbr30: port 1(enp4s0f0) entered forwarding state Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
-
@georgelza So it looks like there is something happening at least. But it states auto-negotiation : no.
So what if you set the Unifi side to 10G and not Autonegotiate?
-
have to pop out for hour, daddy duties. bbl.
G
-
-
It has to be auto at both ends to use that. Otherwise it should link at 10G fixed on both ends.
Probably need to query the module to make sure it at least sees signal on the fiber. I don't have anything to test that with but maybe:
ethtool --show-module enp4s0f0
-
Just to confirm this is Proxmox installed on the same Topton hardware that pfSense couldn't get link on?
-
@stephenw10 said in pfSense not enabling port:
Just to confirm this is Proxmox installed on the same Topton hardware that pfSense couldn't get link on?
No it's a separate machine, thinking it should work in Proxmox at least...
It has to be auto at both ends to use that. Otherwise it should link at 10G fixed on both ends.
Probably need to query the module to make sure it at least sees signal on the fiber. I don't have anything to test that >with but maybe: ethtool --show-module enp4s0f0
It did list this at the end as per the post further up:
Link detected: yes
And Proxmox log was showing interface going up and down...
Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down
Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: vmbr30: port 1(enp4s0f0) entered disabled state
Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: vmbr30: port 1(enp4s0f0) entered blocking state
Oct 31 16:46:17 pmox1 kernel: vmbr30: port 1(enp4s0f0) entered forwarding state
Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down
Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down
Oct 31 16:46:18 pmox1 kernel: ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TXPerhaps time to try a different module, or set of modules / fiber...
-
I've already swopped the fiber out.
And tried the pfSense which was 2 modules there... and that fiber. then ran into issues and thought if we think this is pfSense not liking it lets me jst confirm things work, in a more compatible environment, so installed transceivers into my 2nd Topton that runs pmox. patched that into my Unifi Pro Max port 26 which SFP+ (SFP1), port 25 is (SFP0).
and ye. we not getting much further.
My unifi switch is reporting the correct SFP+ transceivers so can't image there being a problem with them, and well, they brand brand new.
G
-
Ok but it's the same model Topton device? Same NIC?
Yeah, seeing the NIC logged as changing link state like that sure looks like it should be working....
-
@georgelza Just realized one more thing that you might try in Proxmox...
What do you see from this command?
dmesg | grep ixgbe -
@Gblenn said in pfSense not enabling port:
dmesg | grep ixgbe
[175483.486743] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175484.110776] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175484.214719] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175485.462768] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175485.670734] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175485.879762] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175485.982711] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175486.398837] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175486.502809] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175486.606757] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175486.710853] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175487.230749] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175487.438681] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175489.830832] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175489.934714] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175498.150577] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175498.255548] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down [175502.414503] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX [175502.518579] ixgbe 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0: NIC Link is Down
-