Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New PPPoE backend, some feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    156 Posts 12 Posters 8.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      claudio69 @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10

      Yes, I have enabled system/advanced /networking marked Use if_pppoe kernel module for PPPoE client.It seems like a bug in the new version 2.8

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by stephenw10

        Yes, there is a bug there. However currently the bug is that the mpd5 specific options are not hidden correctly. And that the cron-job is still set even thought the script it calls is not present when if_pppoe is enabled.

        If you need this for now you should add your own cronjob. This should work: /etc/rc.interfaces_wan_configure opt2
        Where opt2 is the pppoe interface internal name.

        This should probably also be a feature request. Let me see here...

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          claudio69 @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10

          The WAN interface is pppoe1 which is on igb1.
          There is already a cron job with the script /var/etc/pppoe_restart_pppoe1.
          If you can tell me if this is ok or if this script needs to be modified?

          Schermata del 2025-04-21 19-03-04.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            That script is created to bring up mpd5 so it's not valid when using if_pppoe.

            Here's a bug the covers the invalid options: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16155

            I'll open a feature request to add back the periodic reset for if_pppoe.

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • C
              claudio69 @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10

              Thanks for reporting.
              I hope this feature will be included in pfSense 2.8.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by stephenw10

                It probably won't be in 2.8 but it's a pretty simple feature. I'd expect it could be added via system patches after release.

                Or you can still just add the cronjob manually.

                https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16159

                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  claudio69 @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10

                  The thing is I don't know how to manually make the script to put in cron.
                  If you can kindly give me a working example that would be great and would solve the problem permanently.
                  Thanks

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Edit the cronjob and change the command to: /etc/rc.interfaces_wan_configure opt2

                    Where opt2 is the internal interface name for your pppoe interface. If that's actually WAN then use wan.

                    w0wW C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • w0wW
                      w0w @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                      /etc/rc.interfaces_wan_configure

                      I'll ask something else while we're at it...

                      Regarding manually starting and stopping the WAN interface, which is PPPoE — what's the proper way to do it? Especially with the new backend...

                      /etc/rc.linkup stop wan
                      /etc/rc.linkup start wan

                      Or is there something newer now?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        claudio69 @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10

                        It worked fine.
                        Thanks for your help.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          That should work. There's nothing newer I'm aware of. Because it's now a regular interface (mostly) you should be able to do regular interface things with it. If you want/need to.

                          RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • RobbieTTR
                            RobbieTT @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10

                            Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

                            If so, it may be worth adding it to Jim's article too.

                            Apologies if it exists somewhere but I did look... and clearly I have forgotten all the tweaks I did apply to try and get the best PPPoE performance on the current backend.

                            ☕️

                            stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • w0wW
                              w0w
                              last edited by

                              Does anyone have packet loss on a new backend? The connection is not interrupted just loss of packets, about 5%, once a day or so.

                              MONITOR: WAN_PPPOE has packet loss
                              

                              This could be something on isp or on my side also, because I haven't seen this before. IDK...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Not seen any significant loss here. Been solid since I switched both my edge PPPoE links to it:

                                Screenshot from 2025-04-24 19-20-59.png

                                And I'd been running it for months before that on one WAN in 25.03.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @RobbieTT
                                  last edited by

                                  @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                  Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

                                  There isn't. The testing we did though was without any of the previous pppoe tweaks AFAIK. So the default sysctls only.

                                  RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • RobbieTTR
                                    RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                    last edited by

                                    @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                    @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                    Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

                                    There isn't. The testing we did though was without any of the previous pppoe tweaks AFAIK. So the default sysctls only.

                                    I know, I just need a nudge on what I now need to remove (eg deleting the top entry for a start):

                                     2025-04-24 at 20.24.17.png

                                    ☕️

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by stephenw10

                                      I think only the net.isr.dispatch value there is non-default.

                                      Default values I see here are:

                                      Tunable Name 	Description 	Value 	
                                      net.inet.ip.portrange.first 		1024 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.blackhole 	Do not send RST on segments to closed ports 	2 	
                                      net.inet.udp.blackhole 	Do not send port unreachables for refused connects 	1 	
                                      net.inet.ip.random_id 	Assign random ip_id values 	1 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin 	Drop TCP packets with SYN+FIN set 	1 	
                                      net.inet.ip.redirect 	Enable sending IP redirects 	1 	
                                      net.inet6.ip6.redirect 	Send ICMPv6 redirects for unforwardable IPv6 packets 	1 	
                                      net.inet6.ip6.use_tempaddr 	Create RFC3041 temporary addresses for autoconfigured addresses 	0 	
                                      net.inet6.ip6.prefer_tempaddr 	Prefer RFC3041 temporary addresses in source address selection 	0 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.syncookies 	Use TCP SYN cookies if the syncache overflows 	1 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.recvspace 	Initial receive socket buffer size 	65228 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.sendspace 	Initial send socket buffer size 	65228 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack 	Delay ACK to try and piggyback it onto a data packet 	0 	
                                      net.inet.udp.maxdgram 	Maximum outgoing UDP datagram size 	57344 	
                                      net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip 	Only pass IP packets when pfil is enabled 	0 	
                                      net.link.bridge.pfil_member 	Packet filter on the member interface 	1 	
                                      net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge 	Packet filter on the bridge interface 	0 	
                                      net.link.tap.user_open 	Enable legacy devfs interface creation for all users 	1 	
                                      net.link.vlan.mtag_pcp 	Retain VLAN PCP information as packets are passed up the stack 	1 	
                                      kern.randompid 	Random PID modulus. Special values: 0: disable, 1: choose random value 	347 	
                                      net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen 	Maximum size of the IP input queue 	1000 	
                                      hw.syscons.kbd_reboot 	enable keyboard reboot 	0 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.log_debug 	Log errors caused by incoming TCP segments 	0 	
                                      net.inet.tcp.tso 	Enable TCP Segmentation Offload 	1 	
                                      net.inet.icmp.icmplim 	Maximum number of ICMP responses per second 	0 	
                                      vfs.read_max 	Cluster read-ahead max block count 	32 	
                                      kern.ipc.maxsockbuf 	Maximum socket buffer size 	4262144 	
                                      net.inet.ip.process_options 	Enable IP options processing ([LS]SRR, RR, TS) 	0 	
                                      kern.random.harvest.mask 	Entropy harvesting mask 	351 	
                                      net.route.netisr_maxqlen 	maximum routing socket dispatch queue length 	1024 	
                                      net.inet.udp.checksum 	compute udp checksum 	1 	
                                      net.inet.icmp.reply_from_interface 	ICMP reply from incoming interface for non-local packets 	1 	
                                      net.inet6.ip6.rfc6204w3 	Accept the default router list from ICMPv6 RA messages even when packet forwarding is enabled 	1 	
                                      net.key.preferred_oldsa 		0 	
                                      net.inet.carp.senderr_demotion_factor 	Send error demotion factor adjustment 	0 	
                                      net.pfsync.carp_demotion_factor 	pfsync's CARP demotion factor adjustment 	0 	
                                      net.raw.recvspace 		65536 	
                                      net.raw.sendspace 		65536 	
                                      net.inet.raw.recvspace 	Maximum space for incoming raw IP datagrams 	131072 	
                                      net.inet.raw.maxdgram 	Maximum outgoing raw IP datagram size 	131072 	
                                      kern.corefile 	Process corefile name format string 	/root/%N.core 	
                                      kern.crypto.iimb.enable_aescbc 		1 	
                                      kern.crypto.iimb.enable_multiq 		1 	
                                      kern.crypto.iimb.use_task 		0 	
                                      kern.crypto.iimb.arch 		auto 	
                                      kern.crypto.iimb.prefetch 		1 	
                                      kern.crypto.iimb.max_jobs 		256 
                                      

                                      Urgh, formatting fail!

                                      RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • RobbieTTR
                                        RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10

                                        Well I'm up and running on if_pppoe and I can see the pppoe load being spread across multiple cores. It works!

                                        UK / Openreach FTTP / 1500MTU (baby-jumbos) / Xeon D-1736NT CPU @ 2.70GHz / HyperThreading Off / IPV4 & IPV6 / bidirectional fq_codel / 10 GbE LANs & VLANs

                                        I think I will need to get the Netgate 6100 out and try this. Running pfSense+ on my Xeon provided no issues for single-core PPPoE anyway but it does seem to run at a slightly lower CPU load with the latest config.

                                        No PPP logs or entries in the System logs, which I think has been mentioned already.

                                        ☕️

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Ooo you got full size packets over pppoe working. For some reason I can't seem to set that. I'm wondering if I'm hitting some hardware restriction.

                                          Did you have to do anything special?

                                          RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • RobbieTTR
                                            RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                            last edited by

                                            @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                            Ooo you got full size packets over pppoe working. For some reason I can't seem to set that. I'm wondering if I'm hitting some hardware restriction.

                                            Did you have to do anything special?

                                            Didn't change anything as I did an in-place update so my config was unchanged from before:

                                             2025-04-24 at 22.24.37.png

                                            @Smaug ~ % ping -D -s 1472 8.8.8.8
                                            PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 1472 data bytes
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=119 time=8.628 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=8.637 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=8.457 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=8.303 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=8.383 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=8.600 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=8.442 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=8.582 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=8 ttl=119 time=8.845 ms
                                            1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=9 ttl=119 time=8.423 ms
                                            
                                            

                                            So everything worked for me out of the gate; I only checked it 'just to be sure' as it is a bit of a UK oddity.

                                            I can compare a few things for you tomorrow if you like.

                                            ☕️

                                            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.