Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New PPPoE backend, some feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    217 Posts 18 Posters 31.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      That should work. There's nothing newer I'm aware of. Because it's now a regular interface (mostly) you should be able to do regular interface things with it. If you want/need to.

      RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • RobbieTTR
        RobbieTT @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10

        Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

        If so, it may be worth adding it to Jim's article too.

        Apologies if it exists somewhere but I did look... and clearly I have forgotten all the tweaks I did apply to try and get the best PPPoE performance on the current backend.

        ☕️

        stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • w0wW
          w0w
          last edited by

          Does anyone have packet loss on a new backend? The connection is not interrupted just loss of packets, about 5%, once a day or so.

          MONITOR: WAN_PPPOE has packet loss
          

          This could be something on isp or on my side also, because I haven't seen this before. IDK...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Not seen any significant loss here. Been solid since I switched both my edge PPPoE links to it:

            Screenshot from 2025-04-24 19-20-59.png

            And I'd been running it for months before that on one WAN in 25.03.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @RobbieTT
              last edited by

              @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

              Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

              There isn't. The testing we did though was without any of the previous pppoe tweaks AFAIK. So the default sysctls only.

              RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • RobbieTTR
                RobbieTT @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

                There isn't. The testing we did though was without any of the previous pppoe tweaks AFAIK. So the default sysctls only.

                I know, I just need a nudge on what I now need to remove (eg deleting the top entry for a start):

                 2025-04-24 at 20.24.17.png

                ☕️

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by stephenw10

                  I think only the net.isr.dispatch value there is non-default.

                  Default values I see here are:

                  Tunable Name 	Description 	Value 	
                  net.inet.ip.portrange.first 		1024 	
                  net.inet.tcp.blackhole 	Do not send RST on segments to closed ports 	2 	
                  net.inet.udp.blackhole 	Do not send port unreachables for refused connects 	1 	
                  net.inet.ip.random_id 	Assign random ip_id values 	1 	
                  net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin 	Drop TCP packets with SYN+FIN set 	1 	
                  net.inet.ip.redirect 	Enable sending IP redirects 	1 	
                  net.inet6.ip6.redirect 	Send ICMPv6 redirects for unforwardable IPv6 packets 	1 	
                  net.inet6.ip6.use_tempaddr 	Create RFC3041 temporary addresses for autoconfigured addresses 	0 	
                  net.inet6.ip6.prefer_tempaddr 	Prefer RFC3041 temporary addresses in source address selection 	0 	
                  net.inet.tcp.syncookies 	Use TCP SYN cookies if the syncache overflows 	1 	
                  net.inet.tcp.recvspace 	Initial receive socket buffer size 	65228 	
                  net.inet.tcp.sendspace 	Initial send socket buffer size 	65228 	
                  net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack 	Delay ACK to try and piggyback it onto a data packet 	0 	
                  net.inet.udp.maxdgram 	Maximum outgoing UDP datagram size 	57344 	
                  net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip 	Only pass IP packets when pfil is enabled 	0 	
                  net.link.bridge.pfil_member 	Packet filter on the member interface 	1 	
                  net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge 	Packet filter on the bridge interface 	0 	
                  net.link.tap.user_open 	Enable legacy devfs interface creation for all users 	1 	
                  net.link.vlan.mtag_pcp 	Retain VLAN PCP information as packets are passed up the stack 	1 	
                  kern.randompid 	Random PID modulus. Special values: 0: disable, 1: choose random value 	347 	
                  net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen 	Maximum size of the IP input queue 	1000 	
                  hw.syscons.kbd_reboot 	enable keyboard reboot 	0 	
                  net.inet.tcp.log_debug 	Log errors caused by incoming TCP segments 	0 	
                  net.inet.tcp.tso 	Enable TCP Segmentation Offload 	1 	
                  net.inet.icmp.icmplim 	Maximum number of ICMP responses per second 	0 	
                  vfs.read_max 	Cluster read-ahead max block count 	32 	
                  kern.ipc.maxsockbuf 	Maximum socket buffer size 	4262144 	
                  net.inet.ip.process_options 	Enable IP options processing ([LS]SRR, RR, TS) 	0 	
                  kern.random.harvest.mask 	Entropy harvesting mask 	351 	
                  net.route.netisr_maxqlen 	maximum routing socket dispatch queue length 	1024 	
                  net.inet.udp.checksum 	compute udp checksum 	1 	
                  net.inet.icmp.reply_from_interface 	ICMP reply from incoming interface for non-local packets 	1 	
                  net.inet6.ip6.rfc6204w3 	Accept the default router list from ICMPv6 RA messages even when packet forwarding is enabled 	1 	
                  net.key.preferred_oldsa 		0 	
                  net.inet.carp.senderr_demotion_factor 	Send error demotion factor adjustment 	0 	
                  net.pfsync.carp_demotion_factor 	pfsync's CARP demotion factor adjustment 	0 	
                  net.raw.recvspace 		65536 	
                  net.raw.sendspace 		65536 	
                  net.inet.raw.recvspace 	Maximum space for incoming raw IP datagrams 	131072 	
                  net.inet.raw.maxdgram 	Maximum outgoing raw IP datagram size 	131072 	
                  kern.corefile 	Process corefile name format string 	/root/%N.core 	
                  kern.crypto.iimb.enable_aescbc 		1 	
                  kern.crypto.iimb.enable_multiq 		1 	
                  kern.crypto.iimb.use_task 		0 	
                  kern.crypto.iimb.arch 		auto 	
                  kern.crypto.iimb.prefetch 		1 	
                  kern.crypto.iimb.max_jobs 		256 
                  

                  Urgh, formatting fail!

                  RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RobbieTTR
                    RobbieTT @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10

                    Well I'm up and running on if_pppoe and I can see the pppoe load being spread across multiple cores. It works!

                    UK / Openreach FTTP / 1500MTU (baby-jumbos) / Xeon D-1736NT CPU @ 2.70GHz / HyperThreading Off / IPV4 & IPV6 / bidirectional fq_codel / 10 GbE LANs & VLANs

                    I think I will need to get the Netgate 6100 out and try this. Running pfSense+ on my Xeon provided no issues for single-core PPPoE anyway but it does seem to run at a slightly lower CPU load with the latest config.

                    No PPP logs or entries in the System logs, which I think has been mentioned already.

                    ☕️

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Ooo you got full size packets over pppoe working. For some reason I can't seem to set that. I'm wondering if I'm hitting some hardware restriction.

                      Did you have to do anything special?

                      RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • RobbieTTR
                        RobbieTT @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                        Ooo you got full size packets over pppoe working. For some reason I can't seem to set that. I'm wondering if I'm hitting some hardware restriction.

                        Did you have to do anything special?

                        Didn't change anything as I did an in-place update so my config was unchanged from before:

                         2025-04-24 at 22.24.37.png

                        @Smaug ~ % ping -D -s 1472 8.8.8.8
                        PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 1472 data bytes
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=119 time=8.628 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=8.637 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=8.457 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=8.303 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=8.383 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=8.600 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=8.442 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=8.582 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=8 ttl=119 time=8.845 ms
                        1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=9 ttl=119 time=8.423 ms
                        
                        

                        So everything worked for me out of the gate; I only checked it 'just to be sure' as it is a bit of a UK oddity.

                        I can compare a few things for you tomorrow if you like.

                        ☕️

                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Yup, something odd Openreach are doing. I'll recheck....

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Hmm, I have that set but the actual interface MTU is 1492 still:

                            pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1492
                            	description: BT
                            	options=0
                            	inet 86.191.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                            	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x10
                            	groups: pppoec
                            	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                            

                            Do you have the parent set to 1508?

                            RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Ah forgot I'd added it to a bridge. 🙄

                              That worked once I set the parent to 1508.

                              [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig igb1
                              igb1: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1508
                              	description: BT_MODEM
                              	options=48100b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                              	ether 00:01:21:01:67:76
                              	inet 192.168.102.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.102.255
                              	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6776%igb1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
                              	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                              	status: active
                              	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                              [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: pppcfg pppoe1
                              	dev: igb1 svc: BTInfinity state: session
                              	sid: 0x1a99 PADI retries: 5 PADR retries: 0 time: 00:01:24
                              	sppp: phase network authproto auto authname "bthomehub@btbroadband.com" peerproto auto 
                              	dns: 81.139.56.100 81.139.57.100
                              [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig pppoe1
                              pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1500
                              	description: BT
                              	options=0
                              	inet 86.191.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                              	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xf
                              	groups: pppoec
                              	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                              
                              RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • RobbieTTR
                                RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                Hmm, I have that set but the actual interface MTU is 1492 still:

                                pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1492
                                	description: BT
                                	options=0
                                	inet 86.191.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                                	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x10
                                	groups: pppoec
                                	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                                

                                Do you have the parent set to 1508?

                                The link to the ONT? It is set to 1508 as you would expect - the final pipe needs to be a bit bigger to carry the PPPoE overhead and I am sure you used to have it set that way:

                                 2025-04-24 at 22.54.23.png

                                ☕️

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • RobbieTTR
                                  RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10

                                  Yeah, that would do it for sure!

                                  Mine:

                                  igc0: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1508
                                  	description: ONT
                                  	options=4e020bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                                  	ether 02:76:xx:xx:xx:81
                                  	inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
                                  	inet6 fe80::76:xxxx:fe00:xxxx%igc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
                                  	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                                  	status: active
                                  	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                                  

                                  ☕️

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Yup and in fact you don't have to set the parent to 1508. If you set the pppoe interface to 1500 the parent will inherit that and be set to 1508.

                                    I had the parent interface as part of an unassigned bridge and forgot. In that situation the bridge interface controls the MTU of all the members and was forcing it to 1500.

                                    All good now though. 👍

                                    RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • RobbieTTR
                                      RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                      last edited by

                                      @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                      Yup and in fact you don't have to set the parent to 1508. If you set the pppoe interface to 1500 the parent will inherit that and be set to 1508.

                                      All good now though. 👍

                                      More things I didn't know!

                                      I'll probably leave it set as 1508 just to help remind me what I am doing when I am tired and forgetting what I am supposed to be doing...

                                      ☕️

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • P
                                        Phil2025 @RobbieTT
                                        last edited by Phil2025

                                        @RobbieTT I've posted my issues over in the reddit forum but I'm not sure its been picked up.

                                        If you go to Status-> Interfaces - then Disconnect the WAN interface to drop the PPPoE, then refresh the page to get the button to change to Connect, then Connect, does it reconnect? I only get every other connection attempt work, every other one stalls saying its "UP" but no Gateways or connectivity is established, I need to drop and then reconnect again. It's fine switching back to the original PPPoE.

                                        Also the IPv6 Gateway doesn't always start monitoring correctly, and shows status Unknown, but there is IPv6 connectivity okay. Going into Gateways and into the IPv6 gateway and disabling monitoring, then saving that, then re-enabling monitoring and it starts monitoring and switches back to online.

                                        With regards to the MTU, I find a great way to check is to use Speedguide.net and from the left hand menu select their TCP/IP Analzyer, snapshot of mine below. I would think you are only seeing 1492 MTU and losing the 8 bytes due to PPPoE. Your MTU can be set to 1508 (1508 being what they call a Baby Jumbo Frame) which is supported via Openreach and most others, so that holds the extra overhead for PPPoE, and when that's stripped of you are left then with the full 1500 bytes.

                                        898927d0-fb82-448e-b820-97e69559074f-image.png

                                        aa9dc3c5-b1ff-46f7-994a-7ec5c503f5be-image.png

                                        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • RobbieTTR
                                          RobbieTT @Phil2025
                                          last edited by

                                          @Phil2025 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                          Speedguide.net

                                          Hi Phil, perhaps lost in the noise but I didn't say I had an issue with the PPPoE MTU, only that I checked it to be sure it was still ok, demonstrated my settings and displayed the test results to prove it. @stephenw10 did have a hiccup with his settings due to his role in testing multiple configurations - all now resolved.

                                          I did try the speedguide.net link and I note that it does not run on Safari and seems to require a Chromium-based browser. Using Brave browser my results are:

                                          « SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results » 
                                          Tested on: 2025.04.25 04:13 
                                          IP address: 93.8x.xxx.xx 
                                          Client OS/browser: Mac OS (Chrome 135.0.0.0) 
                                           
                                          TCP options string: 020405b4010303060101080a26e64ea30000000004020000 
                                          MSS: 1460 
                                          MTU: 1500 
                                          TCP Window: 131776 (not multiple of MSS) 
                                          RWIN Scaling: 6 bits (2^6=64) 
                                          Unscaled RWIN : 2059 
                                          Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840 
                                          BDP limit (200ms): 527 Mbps (53 Megabytes/s) 
                                          BDP limit (500ms): 211 Mbps (21 Megabytes/s) 
                                          MTU Discovery: ON 
                                          TTL: 50 
                                          Timestamps: ON 
                                          SACKs: ON 
                                          IP ToS: 00000000 (0) 
                                          
                                          

                                           2025-04-25 at 09.31.19.png

                                          Nothing leaps out at me but I am unfamiliar with this tool so feel free to run your eyes over it for me.

                                          Regarding the Status / Interfaces / PPPoE interface 'Disconnect' I do experience the exact same issue you describe and pfSense seems to hang after the first state change command (eg Disconnect WAN) and if left alone it fails to recover IPv6 properly. If you repeat the command it seems to all work fine again, including IPv6.

                                           2025-04-25 at 09.37.02.png

                                          So that looks like a bug that needs resolving. It may even be linked to the PPP status logs not working, as noted by others.

                                          ☕️

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P
                                            Phil2025 @RobbieTT
                                            last edited by

                                            @RobbieTT Many thanks for trying the connect and disconnect, good to know its not just me, I hope they pick it up and fix it as I think it could mean if the Internet goes down for some reason, it may not come back up again by itself.

                                            Yes your MTU looks spot on, usually with 1500 set under the WAN it would mean you would only see 1492 as MTU, so I expect your ISP is negotiating 1508 when you connect and overriding the 1500 MTU you have set.

                                            With other overheads you end up with 1448 bytes of useable data in each packet. You can tweak things to get rid of those overheads and get a bit more throughput, but things like timestamps are useful for retransmission and recovering from errors, so what you lose in maximum throughput you gain in another way, so its all good as it is I would say.

                                            RobbieTTR w0wW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.