Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New PPPoE backend, some feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    221 Posts 18 Posters 31.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Not seen any significant loss here. Been solid since I switched both my edge PPPoE links to it:

      Screenshot from 2025-04-24 19-20-59.png

      And I'd been running it for months before that on one WAN in 25.03.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @RobbieTT
        last edited by

        @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

        Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

        There isn't. The testing we did though was without any of the previous pppoe tweaks AFAIK. So the default sysctls only.

        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • RobbieTTR
          RobbieTT @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

          @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

          Is there a definitive list of PPPoE performance tweaks that should be removed before using if_pppoe?

          There isn't. The testing we did though was without any of the previous pppoe tweaks AFAIK. So the default sysctls only.

          I know, I just need a nudge on what I now need to remove (eg deleting the top entry for a start):

           2025-04-24 at 20.24.17.png

          ☕️

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by stephenw10

            I think only the net.isr.dispatch value there is non-default.

            Default values I see here are:

            Tunable Name 	Description 	Value 	
            net.inet.ip.portrange.first 		1024 	
            net.inet.tcp.blackhole 	Do not send RST on segments to closed ports 	2 	
            net.inet.udp.blackhole 	Do not send port unreachables for refused connects 	1 	
            net.inet.ip.random_id 	Assign random ip_id values 	1 	
            net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin 	Drop TCP packets with SYN+FIN set 	1 	
            net.inet.ip.redirect 	Enable sending IP redirects 	1 	
            net.inet6.ip6.redirect 	Send ICMPv6 redirects for unforwardable IPv6 packets 	1 	
            net.inet6.ip6.use_tempaddr 	Create RFC3041 temporary addresses for autoconfigured addresses 	0 	
            net.inet6.ip6.prefer_tempaddr 	Prefer RFC3041 temporary addresses in source address selection 	0 	
            net.inet.tcp.syncookies 	Use TCP SYN cookies if the syncache overflows 	1 	
            net.inet.tcp.recvspace 	Initial receive socket buffer size 	65228 	
            net.inet.tcp.sendspace 	Initial send socket buffer size 	65228 	
            net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack 	Delay ACK to try and piggyback it onto a data packet 	0 	
            net.inet.udp.maxdgram 	Maximum outgoing UDP datagram size 	57344 	
            net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip 	Only pass IP packets when pfil is enabled 	0 	
            net.link.bridge.pfil_member 	Packet filter on the member interface 	1 	
            net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge 	Packet filter on the bridge interface 	0 	
            net.link.tap.user_open 	Enable legacy devfs interface creation for all users 	1 	
            net.link.vlan.mtag_pcp 	Retain VLAN PCP information as packets are passed up the stack 	1 	
            kern.randompid 	Random PID modulus. Special values: 0: disable, 1: choose random value 	347 	
            net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen 	Maximum size of the IP input queue 	1000 	
            hw.syscons.kbd_reboot 	enable keyboard reboot 	0 	
            net.inet.tcp.log_debug 	Log errors caused by incoming TCP segments 	0 	
            net.inet.tcp.tso 	Enable TCP Segmentation Offload 	1 	
            net.inet.icmp.icmplim 	Maximum number of ICMP responses per second 	0 	
            vfs.read_max 	Cluster read-ahead max block count 	32 	
            kern.ipc.maxsockbuf 	Maximum socket buffer size 	4262144 	
            net.inet.ip.process_options 	Enable IP options processing ([LS]SRR, RR, TS) 	0 	
            kern.random.harvest.mask 	Entropy harvesting mask 	351 	
            net.route.netisr_maxqlen 	maximum routing socket dispatch queue length 	1024 	
            net.inet.udp.checksum 	compute udp checksum 	1 	
            net.inet.icmp.reply_from_interface 	ICMP reply from incoming interface for non-local packets 	1 	
            net.inet6.ip6.rfc6204w3 	Accept the default router list from ICMPv6 RA messages even when packet forwarding is enabled 	1 	
            net.key.preferred_oldsa 		0 	
            net.inet.carp.senderr_demotion_factor 	Send error demotion factor adjustment 	0 	
            net.pfsync.carp_demotion_factor 	pfsync's CARP demotion factor adjustment 	0 	
            net.raw.recvspace 		65536 	
            net.raw.sendspace 		65536 	
            net.inet.raw.recvspace 	Maximum space for incoming raw IP datagrams 	131072 	
            net.inet.raw.maxdgram 	Maximum outgoing raw IP datagram size 	131072 	
            kern.corefile 	Process corefile name format string 	/root/%N.core 	
            kern.crypto.iimb.enable_aescbc 		1 	
            kern.crypto.iimb.enable_multiq 		1 	
            kern.crypto.iimb.use_task 		0 	
            kern.crypto.iimb.arch 		auto 	
            kern.crypto.iimb.prefetch 		1 	
            kern.crypto.iimb.max_jobs 		256 
            

            Urgh, formatting fail!

            RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • RobbieTTR
              RobbieTT @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10

              Well I'm up and running on if_pppoe and I can see the pppoe load being spread across multiple cores. It works!

              UK / Openreach FTTP / 1500MTU (baby-jumbos) / Xeon D-1736NT CPU @ 2.70GHz / HyperThreading Off / IPV4 & IPV6 / bidirectional fq_codel / 10 GbE LANs & VLANs

              I think I will need to get the Netgate 6100 out and try this. Running pfSense+ on my Xeon provided no issues for single-core PPPoE anyway but it does seem to run at a slightly lower CPU load with the latest config.

              No PPP logs or entries in the System logs, which I think has been mentioned already.

              ☕️

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Ooo you got full size packets over pppoe working. For some reason I can't seem to set that. I'm wondering if I'm hitting some hardware restriction.

                Did you have to do anything special?

                RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RobbieTTR
                  RobbieTT @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                  Ooo you got full size packets over pppoe working. For some reason I can't seem to set that. I'm wondering if I'm hitting some hardware restriction.

                  Did you have to do anything special?

                  Didn't change anything as I did an in-place update so my config was unchanged from before:

                   2025-04-24 at 22.24.37.png

                  @Smaug ~ % ping -D -s 1472 8.8.8.8
                  PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 1472 data bytes
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=119 time=8.628 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=8.637 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=8.457 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=8.303 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=8.383 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=8.600 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=8.442 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=8.582 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=8 ttl=119 time=8.845 ms
                  1480 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=9 ttl=119 time=8.423 ms
                  
                  

                  So everything worked for me out of the gate; I only checked it 'just to be sure' as it is a bit of a UK oddity.

                  I can compare a few things for you tomorrow if you like.

                  ☕️

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Yup, something odd Openreach are doing. I'll recheck....

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Hmm, I have that set but the actual interface MTU is 1492 still:

                      pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1492
                      	description: BT
                      	options=0
                      	inet 86.191.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                      	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x10
                      	groups: pppoec
                      	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                      

                      Do you have the parent set to 1508?

                      RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Ah forgot I'd added it to a bridge. 🙄

                        That worked once I set the parent to 1508.

                        [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig igb1
                        igb1: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1508
                        	description: BT_MODEM
                        	options=48100b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWFILTER,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                        	ether 00:01:21:01:67:76
                        	inet 192.168.102.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.102.255
                        	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6776%igb1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
                        	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                        	status: active
                        	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                        [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: pppcfg pppoe1
                        	dev: igb1 svc: BTInfinity state: session
                        	sid: 0x1a99 PADI retries: 5 PADR retries: 0 time: 00:01:24
                        	sppp: phase network authproto auto authname "bthomehub@btbroadband.com" peerproto auto 
                        	dns: 81.139.56.100 81.139.57.100
                        [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig pppoe1
                        pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1500
                        	description: BT
                        	options=0
                        	inet 86.191.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                        	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xf
                        	groups: pppoec
                        	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                        
                        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • RobbieTTR
                          RobbieTT @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                          Hmm, I have that set but the actual interface MTU is 1492 still:

                          pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1492
                          	description: BT
                          	options=0
                          	inet 86.191.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                          	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x10
                          	groups: pppoec
                          	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                          

                          Do you have the parent set to 1508?

                          The link to the ONT? It is set to 1508 as you would expect - the final pipe needs to be a bit bigger to carry the PPPoE overhead and I am sure you used to have it set that way:

                           2025-04-24 at 22.54.23.png

                          ☕️

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RobbieTTR
                            RobbieTT @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10

                            Yeah, that would do it for sure!

                            Mine:

                            igc0: flags=1008843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1508
                            	description: ONT
                            	options=4e020bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6,HWSTATS,MEXTPG>
                            	ether 02:76:xx:xx:xx:81
                            	inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
                            	inet6 fe80::76:xxxx:fe00:xxxx%igc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
                            	media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>)
                            	status: active
                            	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                            

                            ☕️

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Yup and in fact you don't have to set the parent to 1508. If you set the pppoe interface to 1500 the parent will inherit that and be set to 1508.

                              I had the parent interface as part of an unassigned bridge and forgot. In that situation the bridge interface controls the MTU of all the members and was forcing it to 1500.

                              All good now though. 👍

                              RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • RobbieTTR
                                RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                Yup and in fact you don't have to set the parent to 1508. If you set the pppoe interface to 1500 the parent will inherit that and be set to 1508.

                                All good now though. 👍

                                More things I didn't know!

                                I'll probably leave it set as 1508 just to help remind me what I am doing when I am tired and forgetting what I am supposed to be doing...

                                ☕️

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • P
                                  Phil2025 @RobbieTT
                                  last edited by Phil2025

                                  @RobbieTT I've posted my issues over in the reddit forum but I'm not sure its been picked up.

                                  If you go to Status-> Interfaces - then Disconnect the WAN interface to drop the PPPoE, then refresh the page to get the button to change to Connect, then Connect, does it reconnect? I only get every other connection attempt work, every other one stalls saying its "UP" but no Gateways or connectivity is established, I need to drop and then reconnect again. It's fine switching back to the original PPPoE.

                                  Also the IPv6 Gateway doesn't always start monitoring correctly, and shows status Unknown, but there is IPv6 connectivity okay. Going into Gateways and into the IPv6 gateway and disabling monitoring, then saving that, then re-enabling monitoring and it starts monitoring and switches back to online.

                                  With regards to the MTU, I find a great way to check is to use Speedguide.net and from the left hand menu select their TCP/IP Analzyer, snapshot of mine below. I would think you are only seeing 1492 MTU and losing the 8 bytes due to PPPoE. Your MTU can be set to 1508 (1508 being what they call a Baby Jumbo Frame) which is supported via Openreach and most others, so that holds the extra overhead for PPPoE, and when that's stripped of you are left then with the full 1500 bytes.

                                  898927d0-fb82-448e-b820-97e69559074f-image.png

                                  aa9dc3c5-b1ff-46f7-994a-7ec5c503f5be-image.png

                                  RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • RobbieTTR
                                    RobbieTT @Phil2025
                                    last edited by

                                    @Phil2025 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                    Speedguide.net

                                    Hi Phil, perhaps lost in the noise but I didn't say I had an issue with the PPPoE MTU, only that I checked it to be sure it was still ok, demonstrated my settings and displayed the test results to prove it. @stephenw10 did have a hiccup with his settings due to his role in testing multiple configurations - all now resolved.

                                    I did try the speedguide.net link and I note that it does not run on Safari and seems to require a Chromium-based browser. Using Brave browser my results are:

                                    « SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results » 
                                    Tested on: 2025.04.25 04:13 
                                    IP address: 93.8x.xxx.xx 
                                    Client OS/browser: Mac OS (Chrome 135.0.0.0) 
                                     
                                    TCP options string: 020405b4010303060101080a26e64ea30000000004020000 
                                    MSS: 1460 
                                    MTU: 1500 
                                    TCP Window: 131776 (not multiple of MSS) 
                                    RWIN Scaling: 6 bits (2^6=64) 
                                    Unscaled RWIN : 2059 
                                    Recommended RWINs: 64240, 128480, 256960, 513920, 1027840 
                                    BDP limit (200ms): 527 Mbps (53 Megabytes/s) 
                                    BDP limit (500ms): 211 Mbps (21 Megabytes/s) 
                                    MTU Discovery: ON 
                                    TTL: 50 
                                    Timestamps: ON 
                                    SACKs: ON 
                                    IP ToS: 00000000 (0) 
                                    
                                    

                                     2025-04-25 at 09.31.19.png

                                    Nothing leaps out at me but I am unfamiliar with this tool so feel free to run your eyes over it for me.

                                    Regarding the Status / Interfaces / PPPoE interface 'Disconnect' I do experience the exact same issue you describe and pfSense seems to hang after the first state change command (eg Disconnect WAN) and if left alone it fails to recover IPv6 properly. If you repeat the command it seems to all work fine again, including IPv6.

                                     2025-04-25 at 09.37.02.png

                                    So that looks like a bug that needs resolving. It may even be linked to the PPP status logs not working, as noted by others.

                                    ☕️

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P
                                      Phil2025 @RobbieTT
                                      last edited by

                                      @RobbieTT Many thanks for trying the connect and disconnect, good to know its not just me, I hope they pick it up and fix it as I think it could mean if the Internet goes down for some reason, it may not come back up again by itself.

                                      Yes your MTU looks spot on, usually with 1500 set under the WAN it would mean you would only see 1492 as MTU, so I expect your ISP is negotiating 1508 when you connect and overriding the 1500 MTU you have set.

                                      With other overheads you end up with 1448 bytes of useable data in each packet. You can tweak things to get rid of those overheads and get a bit more throughput, but things like timestamps are useful for retransmission and recovering from errors, so what you lose in maximum throughput you gain in another way, so its all good as it is I would say.

                                      RobbieTTR w0wW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • RobbieTTR
                                        RobbieTT @Phil2025
                                        last edited by RobbieTT

                                        @Phil2025

                                        I have 1508 MTU set on the interface carrying the PPPoE encapsulation (listed as ONT in my examples above).

                                        The un-molested WAN connection inside this encapsulated and slightly larger MTU pipe is set at the standard 1500 MTU (albeit note @stephenw10's comments above).

                                        I don't think the ISP or Openreach can negotiate a 1508 MTU if you have a smaller one set. Indeed, there are many users out there with either no appreciation for baby jumbo frames or have inflexible hardware that does not allow for an MTU above 1500 to be set.

                                        The BT SINs make no mention of being able to negotiate a higher MTU than requested; the exact opposite is stated though, with connectivity warnings. From memory the BT SINs give a maximum MTU of 1530 (previously 1520) on the Openreach network.

                                        I'm not sure what overheads can be tweaked or removed on my PPPoE connection to get additional throughput though - can you expand on these for me please?

                                        ☕️

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by stephenw10

                                          I think the connection status you see is actually an artifact of the new interface type. I can sort of replicate what you see but in fact it does connect it's just not instant. You can see what the actual state is using the new pppcfg command.

                                          When you disconnect the interface in the gui it is removed entirely:

                                          [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: pppcfg pppoe1
                                          [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig pppoe1
                                          ifconfig: interface pppoe1 does not exist
                                          

                                          Then as soon as you click connect the interface is created and is shown as UP but the PPP link it still connecting:

                                          [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: pppcfg pppoe1
                                          	dev: igb1 svc: BTInfinity state: PADI sent
                                          	sid: 0x0 PADI retries: 3 PADR retries: 0
                                          	sppp: phase establish authproto auto authname "bthomehub@btbroadband.com" peerproto auto 
                                          [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig pppoe1
                                          pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1500
                                          	description: BT
                                          	options=0
                                          	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 tentative scopeid 0x13
                                          	groups: pppoec
                                          	nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
                                          

                                          Then after some time it completes the connection:

                                          [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: pppcfg pppoe1
                                          	dev: igb1 svc: BTInfinity state: session
                                          	sid: 0x1b6d PADI retries: 4 PADR retries: 0 time: 00:00:12
                                          	sppp: phase network authproto auto authname "bthomehub@btbroadband.com" peerproto auto 
                                          	dns: 81.139.56.100 81.139.57.100
                                          [2.8.0-BETA][admin@pfsense.fire.box]/root: ifconfig pppoe1
                                          pppoe1: flags=1008851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP> metric 0 mtu 1500
                                          	description: BT
                                          	options=0
                                          	inet 217.45.X.X --> 172.16.13.252 netmask 0xffffffff
                                          	inet6 fe80::201:21ff:fe01:6775%pppoe1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x13
                                          	groups: pppoec
                                          	nd6 options=123<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL,NO_DAD>
                                          

                                          The actual time taken depends how fast the server responds. For be that be almost instant or it can be several retries and 20-30s.

                                          If you just refresh the Status page without clicking connect again it should just connect.

                                          We saw your post on Reddit yesterday and were discussing options to make the age clearer for if_pppoe. Not sure what will happen yet.

                                          RobbieTTR P 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • w0wW
                                            w0w @Phil2025
                                            last edited by

                                            @Phil2025 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                            Many thanks for trying the connect and disconnect, good to know its not just me, I hope they pick it up and fix it as I think it could mean if the Internet goes down for some reason, it may not come back up again by itself.

                                            I have the same problem. I thought it was just me. Please report it on Redmine.

                                            @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                            It may even be linked to the PPP status logs not working, as noted by others

                                            I don't think so, this is some kind of "GUI switching between backends" problem.

                                            As for MTU....mine is set to 1492 but I am using MSS also custom
                                            da67a5ef-ac36-420d-996e-1f92444e2eb7-{0E1ED290-FD16-4525-ADCE-89C980D30C5C}.png

                                            « SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results » 
                                            Tested on: 2025.04.25 05:40 
                                            IP address: 84.52.xx.xx 
                                            Client OS/browser: Windows 10 (Firefox 137.0) 
                                             
                                            TCP options string: 020405200103030801010402 
                                            MSS: 1312 
                                            MTU: 1352 
                                            TCP Window: 65280 (not multiple of MSS) 
                                            RWIN Scaling: 8 bits (2^8=256) 
                                            Unscaled RWIN : 255 
                                            Recommended RWINs: 62976, 125952, 251904, 503808, 1007616 
                                            BDP limit (200ms): 2611 kbps (261 Kilobytes/s) 
                                            BDP limit (500ms): 1044 kbps (104 Kilobytes/s) 
                                            MTU Discovery: OFF 
                                            TTL: 54 
                                            Timestamps: OFF 
                                            SACKs: ON 
                                            IP ToS: 00000010 (2) 
                                                Precedence: 000 (routine)
                                                Delay: 0 (normal delay)
                                                Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
                                                Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
                                                Cost: 1 (low cost)
                                                Check bit: 0 (correct)
                                            DSCP (DiffServ): CS0 000000 (0) - class 0, default traffic (RFC 2474).
                                            
                                            

                                            And Empty fields in WAN configuration gives me:

                                            « SpeedGuide.net TCP Analyzer Results » 
                                            Tested on: 2025.04.25 05:55 
                                            IP address: 84.52.xx.xxx 
                                            Client OS/browser: Windows 10 (Firefox 137.0) 
                                             
                                            TCP options string: 020405ac0103030801010402 
                                            MSS: 1452 
                                            MTU: 1492 
                                            TCP Window: 65280 (not multiple of MSS) 
                                            RWIN Scaling: 8 bits (2^8=256) 
                                            Unscaled RWIN : 255 
                                            Recommended RWINs: 63888, 127776, 255552, 511104, 1022208 
                                            BDP limit (200ms): 2611 kbps (261 Kilobytes/s) 
                                            BDP limit (500ms): 1044 kbps (104 Kilobytes/s) 
                                            MTU Discovery: OFF 
                                            TTL: 54 
                                            Timestamps: OFF 
                                            SACKs: ON 
                                            IP ToS: 00000010 (2) 
                                                Precedence: 000 (routine)
                                                Delay: 0 (normal delay)
                                                Throughput: 0 (normal throughput)
                                                Reliability: 0 (normal reliability)
                                                Cost: 1 (low cost)
                                                Check bit: 0 (correct)
                                            DSCP (DiffServ): CS0 000000 (0) - class 0, default traffic (RFC 2474).
                                            
                                            

                                            I'm pretty sure my ISP doesn't support any RFCs that would allow pushing over 1492, because the connection just fails when I set the MTU to 1500.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.