Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New PPPoE backend, some feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Development
    217 Posts 18 Posters 31.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      MichielHN @bananajoe
      last edited by

      @bananajoe
      setting IPv6 GW manually works fine, but i wonder what would happen if the isp decides to assign a different ipv6 range.

      @w0w
      Schermafbeelding 2025-04-29 134640.jpg

      B w0wW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        bananajoe @MichielHN
        last edited by

        @MichielHN
        Different IPv6 range should be no problem, as the route is bound to the interface itself, not to the IPv6 address.
        Should be dynamic. At least in my seatup it works great.

        PPPoE and 24h reset by ISP

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RobbieTTR
          RobbieTT @stephenw10
          last edited by RobbieTT

          @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

          I think the connection status you see is actually an artifact of the new interface type. I can sort of replicate what you see but in fact it does connect it's just not instant. You can see what the actual state is using the new pppcfg command.
          ...
          The actual time taken depends how fast the server responds. For be that be almost instant or it can be several retries and 20-30s.

          @stephenw10 commented on one of my (presumed) 'successful' connection attempts that I sent along with other pcaps. From the GUI it seemed to connect ok, within normal timeframes but looking in detail the PADI, PADO, PADR and PADS were all completed in around 6 ms (effectively instant). What then followed was repeated 'Configuration Requests' and the associated 'Ack' in response, stuck in a loop (in this case) for 20 sec.

          In worst case examples this loop carries on for minutes and if or until it is resolved the dashboard shows the interface as 'Up' (but without details) and the Gateways show as 'Pending'. In this condition no WAN traffic is passed.

          The redacted screenshot of the pcap is filtered on PPPoE activity alone:

           2025-04-29 at 13.07.47.png

          ☕️

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Yeah that config delay seems odd. I'd expect that to be close to instant really. Though I guess some part of he upstream server might be delayed at the backend. 🤔

            But the important part there would be whether or not it does eventually connect.

            The old mpd5/netgraph pppoe client also shows as up if it's parent NIC is linked but if_pppoe, currently, shows as 'up' at all times one the interface is created. That's confusing the status page. It does seem like we could improve that relatively easily by including the connection state info there.

            RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @MichielHN
              last edited by

              @MichielHN

              Try setting Start DHCP6 client in debug mode in System > Advanced > Networking.

              It's not clear from your dhcp logs whether or not it's actually running on pppoe0.

              Also you can filter that log by the dhcp6c process. Everything else shown there isn't relevant.

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • RobbieTTR
                RobbieTT @stephenw10
                last edited by RobbieTT

                @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                Yeah that config delay seems odd. I'd expect that to be close to instant really. Though I guess some part of he upstream server might be delayed at the backend. 🤔

                I did ponder that but pfSense asks the question and the upstream responds immediately with the correct Ack. There is nothing different in the multiple upstream server responses, even at the final time where pfSense stops asking, seemingly satisfied with the last repeated Ack.

                Is there any chance the almost-paired PPP IPCP and PPP IPV6CP Requests are stepping on or resetting each other's almost-paired Acks?

                In effect:
                Request, Request, Ack, Ack = not good, loop continues
                Request, Ack, Request, Ack = good

                Only the sequencing changes for the final accepted Acks, not the response Ack data. I know it shouldn't matter but it is the only difference I can find:

                 2025-04-29 at 15.03.33.png

                ☕️

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  MichielHN @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10

                  in the end there seems to be a response from pppoe but the gateway DHCP6 is still 'waiting'

                  the full 'grep dhcp6c /var/log/dhcpd.log' is too long to post

                  Apr 29 15:53:55 sofie dhcp6c[51825]: removing an event on pppoe0, state=INIT
                  Apr 29 15:53:55 sofie dhcp6c[51825]: executes /var/etc/dhcp6c_opt6_script.sh
                  Apr 29 15:53:55 sofie dhcp6c[53992]: lstat failed: No such file or directory
                  Apr 29 15:53:55 sofie dhcp6c[53992]: script "/var/etc/dhcp6c_opt6_script.sh" cannot be executed safely
                  Apr 29 15:53:55 sofie dhcp6c[51825]: script "/var/etc/dhcp6c_opt6_script.sh" terminated
                  Apr 29 15:53:55 sofie dhcp6c[51825]: exiting
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: extracted an existing DUID from /var/db/dhcp6c_duid: 00:01:00:01:2c:6d:3a:28:7c:5a:1c:54:33:00
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: failed to open /usr/local/etc/dhcp6cctlkey: No such file or directory
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: failed initialize control message authentication
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: skip opening control port
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[interface] (9)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <5>[pppoe0] (6)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>begin of closure [{] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[send] (4)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[ia-pd] (5)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[0] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>comment [# request prefix delegation] (27)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[request] (7)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[domain-name-servers] (19)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[request] (7)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[domain-name] (11)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[script] (6)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>["/var/etc/dhcp6c_opt6_script.sh"] (32)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>comment [# we'd like some nameservers please] (35)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of closure [}] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[id-assoc] (8)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <13>[pd] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <13>[0] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <13>begin of closure [{] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[prefix] (6)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[::] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[/] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[48] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[infinity] (8)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[prefix-interface] (16)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <5>[igb0] (4)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>begin of closure [{] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[sla-id] (6)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[0] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[sla-len] (7)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[16] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of closure [}] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[prefix-interface] (16)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <5>[lagg0] (5)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>begin of closure [{] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[sla-id] (6)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[2] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[sla-len] (7)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[16] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of closure [}] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[prefix-interface] (16)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <5>[lagg0.20] (8)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>begin of closure [{] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[sla-id] (6)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[32] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[sla-len] (7)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>[16] (2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of closure [}] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of closure [}] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: <3>end of sentence [;] (1)
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: called
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18129]: called
                  Apr 29 15:54:05 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: reset a timer on pppoe0, state=INIT, timeo=0, retrans=891
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: Sending Solicit
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: a new XID (6c1ff3) is generated
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set client ID (len 14)
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set elapsed time (len 2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set option request (len 4)
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set IA_PD prefix
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set IA_PD
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: send solicit to ff02::1:2%pppoe0
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: reset a timer on pppoe0, state=SOLICIT, timeo=0, retrans=1091
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: receive advertise from fe80::9217:3fff:fe22:6263%pppoe0 on pppoe0
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option client ID, len 14
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: DUID: 00:01:00:01:2c:6d:3a:28:7c:5a:1c:54:33:00
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option server ID, len 14
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: DUID: 00:01:00:06:00:73:e3:ad:90:17:ac:bf:97:dd
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option preference, len 1
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: preference: 0
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option IA_PD, len 54
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: IA_PD: ID=0, T1=86400, T2=138240
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option IA_PD prefix, len 25
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: IA_PD prefix: 2a02:a45b:e304::/48 pltime=172800 vltime=2292014193773376640
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option status code, len 9
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: status code: success
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option DNS, len 32
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: server ID: 00:01:00:06:00:73:e3:ad:90:17:ac:bf:97:dd, pref=0
                  Apr 29 15:54:06 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: reset timer for pppoe0 to 0.985017
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: picked a server (ID: 00:01:00:06:00:73:e3:ad:90:17:ac:bf:97:dd)
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: Sending Request
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: a new XID (f46830) is generated
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set client ID (len 14)
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set server ID (len 14)
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set elapsed time (len 2)
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set option request (len 4)
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set IA_PD prefix
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set status code
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: set IA_PD
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: send request to ff02::1:2%pppoe0
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: reset a timer on pppoe0, state=REQUEST, timeo=0, retrans=909
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: receive reply from fe80::9217:3fff:fe22:6263%pppoe0 on pppoe0
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option client ID, len 14
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: DUID: 00:01:00:01:2c:6d:3a:28:7c:5a:1c:54:33:00
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option server ID, len 14
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: DUID: 00:01:00:06:00:73:e3:ad:90:17:ac:bf:97:dd
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option IA_PD, len 54
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: IA_PD: ID=0, T1=86400, T2=138240
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option IA_PD prefix, len 25
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: IA_PD prefix: 2a02:a45b:e304::/48 pltime=172800 vltime=2292014193773376640
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option status code, len 9
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: status code: success
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: get DHCP option DNS, len 32
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: dhcp6c Received REQUEST
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: nameserver[0] 2a02:a47f:e000::53
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: nameserver[1] 2a02:a47f:e000::54
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: make an IA: PD-0
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: create a prefix 2a02:XXXX:XXXX::/48 pltime=172800, vltime=259200
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: add an address 2a02:XXXX:XXXX:0:7e5a:1cff:fe54:3300/64 on igb0
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: add an address 2a02:XXXX:XXXX:2:7e5a:1cff:fe54:3303/64 on lagg0
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: add an address 2a02:XXXX:XXXX:20:7e5a:1cff:fe54:3303/64 on lagg0.20
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: status code for PD-0: success
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: executes /var/etc/dhcp6c_opt6_script.sh
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[58580]: dhcp6c RELEASE, REQUEST or EXIT on pppoe0 running rc.newwanipv6
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: script "/var/etc/dhcp6c_opt6_script.sh" terminated
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: removing an event on pppoe0, state=REQUEST
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: removing server (ID: 00:01:00:06:00:73:e3:ad:90:17:ac:bf:97:dd)
                  Apr 29 15:54:07 sofie dhcp6c[18258]: got an expected reply, sleeping.

                  stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by stephenw10

                    @RobbieTT

                    Hmm, interesting!

                    I note that in that last request it asks for a different IPaddress. But then connects and stars using the IP the server had been passing it in the previous request/acks. 🤔

                    RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @MichielHN
                      last edited by

                      @MichielHN

                      That looks like it's completing as expected. You see the prefixes added to the internal interfaces?

                      Do you see the gateway in the NDP table?

                      Does that exact same config work when not using if_pppoe?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • w0wW
                        w0w @MichielHN
                        last edited by

                        @MichielHN
                        oops sorry, I mean this one
                        8ac789e0-22a0-4beb-9faa-07758e8cf765-image.png

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • RobbieTTR
                          RobbieTT @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                          @RobbieTT

                          Hmm, interesting!

                          I note that in that last request it asks for a different IPaddress. But then connects and stars using the IP the server had been passing it in the previous request/acks. 🤔

                          Apart from the very first request (where it uses 0.0.0.0.) it uses my static IPv4 address, which is obtained via DHCP. The oddball IP you see at the end of the PCAP is the IPv4 of the upstream PPPoE server (it picks from a list of 5 or 6 possible addresses).

                          ☕️

                          stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            MichielHN @w0w
                            last edited by

                            @w0w
                            like image posted above
                            link text
                            WANix1 is the WAN interface (ix1 for intel 10g sfp+ nic1, nic0 is internal)

                            @stephenw10
                            while the gateway says its 'waiting' the local computers get ipv6 connection now, and probably before as well. NDP table looks fine. I concluded 'it's not working' based on the status/gateways overview.

                            so the real question should be, why doesn't the gateway show as active?

                            w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @RobbieTT
                              last edited by

                              @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                              it uses my static IPv4 address, which is obtained via DHCP.

                              Like, when it's not using PPPoE?

                              RobbieTTR M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • w0wW
                                w0w @MichielHN
                                last edited by

                                @MichielHN said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                like image posted above

                                Ahh looks OK, just missed that...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • RobbieTTR
                                  RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                  Like, when it's not using PPPoE?

                                  No, until the upstream PPPoE assigns my static IP via DHCP the firewall has no idea of my IP address.

                                  I've no idea why my ISP likes to issue my IPv4 address dynamically rather than have me fat-fingering it in myself.

                                  stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    MichielHN @stephenw10
                                    last edited by MichielHN

                                    @stephenw10

                                    Testing download speed................................................................................
                                    Download: 2853.69 Mbit/s
                                    Testing upload speed......................................................................................................
                                    Upload: 885.09 Mbit/s

                                    (over pppoe, ideal should be 4g/4g according to the provider but i'm very content already)
                                    added monitor ip to the dynamic gateway, it shows as active now
                                    thanks for your time/help on this forum.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @RobbieTT
                                      last edited by

                                      @RobbieTT said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                      No, until the upstream PPPoE assigns my static IP via DHCP the firewall has no idea of my IP address.

                                      Hmm, your ISP is doing DHCP over PPPoE? For IPv4? I don't think I've ever seen that if so.

                                      RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • RobbieTTR
                                        RobbieTT @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                        Hmm, your ISP is doing DHCP over PPPoE? For IPv4? I don't think I've ever seen that if so.

                                        Probably my poor choice of terms Steve. The ISP dynamically sets my WAN IP address (albeit my IPv4 address is static) as part of the PPPoE connection process. For most UK residential customers they will have a dynamic WAN IP address assigned by the ISP on connection (PPPoE or DHCP) and this will periodically change, including on reboot etc.

                                        Whilst we use different terms on routers between DHCP and PPPoE connections a PPPoE connection can still (and usually does in the UK) have a form of dynamic host configuration. This is sent by the upstream PPPoE server down to the router, which is effectively now a PPPoE client, including the dynamically assigned IP address(es) as well as the other network parameters.

                                        For PPPoE connection the dynamic host configuration comes immediately after the CHAP, triggered by the Configuration Request with the dynamic host configuration coming back on the Ack (dynamic options, IP address to use, DNS info etc. Sometimes it is referred to as the PPP IP Control measures but it is a bit broader than IP address control alone.

                                        You and I both use PPPoE over the BT/Openreach infrastructure so presumably there are few (if any) significant differences between our connections, even though I have a different ISP.

                                        There are many ways to describe things but this one is mine so only subject to my errors!

                                        ☕️

                                        stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by stephenw10

                                          Ah OK, good. For a minute there I thought you had some weird edge case connection.

                                          Yes, AFAIK almost all UK ISPs use the same low level infrastructure. Certainly if they are not LLU providers, like Sky for example.

                                          Then it seems like I should be able to hit it given enough poking....

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • C
                                            chrcoluk
                                            last edited by

                                            I think this is awesome this has been developed, thank you to everyone who has contributed to it. I think in the UK it will be especially appreciated as almost all ISPs are wanting to keep using PPPoE instead of IPoE.

                                            pfSense CE 2.8.0

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.