Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Do the default RA's need tweaking.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    27 Posts 10 Posters 6.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RobbieTTR
      RobbieTT @pst
      last edited by RobbieTT

      @pst The default and example configuration file in v2.19 use the later x3 standard. The example text included with pfSense also uses the factor 10 sec x 3 = 30 seconds.

      Joined-up, it is not.

      โ˜•๏ธ

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pst @RobbieTT
        last edited by

        @RobbieTT There has been a change submitted to RADVD which align it to RFC8106:

        https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/commit/17c43bff200bbc1d4786eb917860a79db4f95c2e

        Hopefully that will trickle through the system and end up in a pfSense release, at some point.

        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RobbieTTR
          RobbieTT @pst
          last edited by RobbieTT

          @pst said in Do the default RA's need tweaking.:

          @RobbieTT There has been a change submitted to RADVD which align it to RFC8106:

          Thanks for that, very helpful. ๐Ÿ‘

          It shows as a committ and the issue marked as closed over 2 years ago. Do we know where the air gap is between the issue being resolved and where we are now with pfSense?

          [To me it looks like radvd itself has not been touched in over 2 years, suggesting that this package is not being maintained.]

          โ˜•๏ธ

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pst @RobbieTT
            last edited by

            @RobbieTT No decision about a RADVD 2.20 release has been made yet (as of this post's date anyway), but voices has been raised:

            https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/185

            I don't know how long it will take after the 2.20 release before it ends up in pfSense as it needs to be integrated into FreeBSD first (I guess).

            RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • RobbieTTR
              RobbieTT @pst
              last edited by

              @pst Not looking good - the last question on 2.20 is asking if downstream users are now expected to build from git, rather than a [2.20] tagged release.

              That was in January 2023.

              Indeed, there have been no releases since the original package maintainer retired in Jan 2021.

              โ˜•๏ธ

              bearhntrB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • bearhntrB
                bearhntr @RobbieTT
                last edited by

                @RobbieTT

                Is there a way to fix this? Is there a set of instructions on fixing it? I am not super-Linux proficient, simple-is as simple-does. ๐Ÿ˜Š

                I just going through some of these logs on my pfSense+ 23.05.1-RELEASE (amd64) - Just installed the latest this AM.

                I am one of those who hates seeing errors and warnings. <grin>

                RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RobbieTTR
                  RobbieTT @bearhntr
                  last edited by

                  @bearhntr
                  I've no idea, sorry!

                  โ˜•๏ธ

                  JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JonathanLeeJ
                    JonathanLee @RobbieTT
                    last edited by

                    @RobbieTT can I apply this patch in 23.05.01 ?https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/54b3109f0b1978e22866117b6d93715eb8d78c29

                    Make sure to upvote

                    GertjanG RobbieTTR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JonathanLeeJ JonathanLee referenced this topic
                    • GertjanG
                      Gertjan @JonathanLee
                      last edited by Gertjan

                      @JonathanLee said in Do the default RA's need tweaking.:

                      https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/54b3109f0b1978e22866117b6d93715eb8d78c29

                      =>

                      e1e7fd8e-16f1-4d62-8016-3063e99a0a42-image.png

                      taht patch was applied more then 4 years !?

                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • RobbieTTR
                        RobbieTT @JonathanLee
                        last edited by

                        @JonathanLee said in Do the default RA's need tweaking.:

                        @RobbieTT can I apply this patch in 23.05.01 ?https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/54b3109f0b1978e22866117b6d93715eb8d78c29

                        Presumably not but there will be some RA tweaks in 25.07, which is not that far away from release.

                        โ˜•๏ธ

                        bearhntrB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • bearhntrB
                          bearhntr @RobbieTT
                          last edited by

                          @RobbieTT

                          What about in this version?

                          0258b777-8f53-4d7c-b490-8b57d6955097-image.png

                          RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RobbieTTR
                            RobbieTT @bearhntr
                            last edited by

                            @bearhntr

                            I would presume not, at least not yet.

                            โ˜•๏ธ

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.