Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Do the default RA's need tweaking.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    27 Posts 10 Posters 6.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pst @RobbieTT
      last edited by

      @RobbieTT There has been a change submitted to RADVD which align it to RFC8106:

      https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/commit/17c43bff200bbc1d4786eb917860a79db4f95c2e

      Hopefully that will trickle through the system and end up in a pfSense release, at some point.

      RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RobbieTTR
        RobbieTT @pst
        last edited by RobbieTT

        @pst said in Do the default RA's need tweaking.:

        @RobbieTT There has been a change submitted to RADVD which align it to RFC8106:

        Thanks for that, very helpful. ๐Ÿ‘

        It shows as a committ and the issue marked as closed over 2 years ago. Do we know where the air gap is between the issue being resolved and where we are now with pfSense?

        [To me it looks like radvd itself has not been touched in over 2 years, suggesting that this package is not being maintained.]

        โ˜•๏ธ

        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pst @RobbieTT
          last edited by

          @RobbieTT No decision about a RADVD 2.20 release has been made yet (as of this post's date anyway), but voices has been raised:

          https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/185

          I don't know how long it will take after the 2.20 release before it ends up in pfSense as it needs to be integrated into FreeBSD first (I guess).

          RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • RobbieTTR
            RobbieTT @pst
            last edited by

            @pst Not looking good - the last question on 2.20 is asking if downstream users are now expected to build from git, rather than a [2.20] tagged release.

            That was in January 2023.

            Indeed, there have been no releases since the original package maintainer retired in Jan 2021.

            โ˜•๏ธ

            bearhntrB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • bearhntrB
              bearhntr @RobbieTT
              last edited by

              @RobbieTT

              Is there a way to fix this? Is there a set of instructions on fixing it? I am not super-Linux proficient, simple-is as simple-does. ๐Ÿ˜Š

              I just going through some of these logs on my pfSense+ 23.05.1-RELEASE (amd64) - Just installed the latest this AM.

              I am one of those who hates seeing errors and warnings. <grin>

              RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • RobbieTTR
                RobbieTT @bearhntr
                last edited by

                @bearhntr
                I've no idea, sorry!

                โ˜•๏ธ

                JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JonathanLeeJ
                  JonathanLee @RobbieTT
                  last edited by

                  @RobbieTT can I apply this patch in 23.05.01 ?https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/54b3109f0b1978e22866117b6d93715eb8d78c29

                  Make sure to upvote

                  GertjanG RobbieTTR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JonathanLeeJ JonathanLee referenced this topic
                  • GertjanG
                    Gertjan @JonathanLee
                    last edited by Gertjan

                    @JonathanLee said in Do the default RA's need tweaking.:

                    https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/54b3109f0b1978e22866117b6d93715eb8d78c29

                    =>

                    e1e7fd8e-16f1-4d62-8016-3063e99a0a42-image.png

                    taht patch was applied more then 4 years !?

                    No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                    Edit : and where are the logs ??

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • RobbieTTR
                      RobbieTT @JonathanLee
                      last edited by

                      @JonathanLee said in Do the default RA's need tweaking.:

                      @RobbieTT can I apply this patch in 23.05.01 ?https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/repository/2/revisions/54b3109f0b1978e22866117b6d93715eb8d78c29

                      Presumably not but there will be some RA tweaks in 25.07, which is not that far away from release.

                      โ˜•๏ธ

                      bearhntrB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • bearhntrB
                        bearhntr @RobbieTT
                        last edited by

                        @RobbieTT

                        What about in this version?

                        0258b777-8f53-4d7c-b490-8b57d6955097-image.png

                        RobbieTTR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • RobbieTTR
                          RobbieTT @bearhntr
                          last edited by

                          @bearhntr

                          I would presume not, at least not yet.

                          โ˜•๏ธ

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.