Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    if_pppoe problems with php-fpm causing loops. (resolved)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    41 Posts 3 Posters 1.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      chrcoluk @stephenw10
      last edited by chrcoluk

      @stephenw10 Ok I just made this patch and now it comes up automatically.

      --- /etc/inc/interfaces.inc     2025-05-20 15:25:19.000000000 +0100
      +++ /etc/inc/interfaces.inc        2025-07-07 19:48:09.639482000 +0100
      @@ -4028,6 +4028,7 @@
                      kill_dhcp6client_process(true);
                      /* Lock it to avoid multiple runs */
                      touch("/tmp/dhcp6c_lock");
      +               mwexec("/bin/sleep 6");
                      mwexec("/usr/local/sbin/dhcp6c {$debugOption} " .
                          "{$noreleaseOption} " .
                          "-c {$g['varetc_path']}/dhcp6c.conf " .
      

      I dont mind doing what you requested for the script contents on the old pppoe, but thats extended down time with the reboot, so will try it tomorrow morning when everyone asleep.

      pfSense CE 2.8.0

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • w0wW
        w0w @chrcoluk
        last edited by

        @chrcoluk said in if_pppoe serious problems with php-fpm causing loops.:

        So even with the IPv6 online after my manual intervention, its unhappy about something

        Receiving RA packets can trigger this, which is normal.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Hmm, interesting.

          Does it still show the newwanip log every hour?

          Nothing in the dhcp log at that time?

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            chrcoluk @stephenw10
            last edited by chrcoluk

            @stephenw10 It does but it seems that might be normal behaviour now. w0w's reply suggests that as well.

            I have 2 dhcp6c clients running, which might be down to my manual intervention earlier, so I will reboot tomorrow morning to get the contents of that script for you and then check if is only one clent after I boot back into if_pppoe again and with it starting on that 6 second delay.

            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	got an expected reply, sleeping.
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	removing an event on pppoe2, state=RENEW
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	script "/var/etc/dhcp6c_wan_script.sh" terminated
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	1126 	dhcp6c RENEW on pppoe2 running rc.newwanipv6
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	executes /var/etc/dhcp6c_wan_script.sh
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	add an address 2001:<blah> on pppoe2
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	update an address 2001:<blah> pltime=3600, vltime=31104153164832
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	update an IA: NA-0
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	dhcp6c Received INFO
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	IA_NA address: 2001:<blah> pltime=3600 vltime=7200
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option IA address, len 24
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	IA_NA: ID=0, T1=3600, T2=5760
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option identity association, len 40
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	DUID: <blah>
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option server ID, len 10
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	DUID: <blah>
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option client ID, len 14
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	receive reply from <blah>%pppoe2 on pppoe2
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	send renew to ff02::1:2%pppoe2
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	set option request (len 4)
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	set elapsed time (len 2)
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	set identity association
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	set IA address
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	set server ID (len 10)
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	set client ID (len 14)
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	a new XID (e1ca48) is generated
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	Sending Renew
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	reset a timer on pppoe2, state=RENEW, timeo=0, retrans=9042
            Jul 7 21:50:18 	dhcp6c 	38871 	IA timeout for NA-0, state=ACTIVE
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	XID mismatch
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	IA_NA address: 2001:<blah> pltime=3600 vltime=7200
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option IA address, len 24
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	IA_NA: ID=0, T1=3600, T2=5760
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option identity association, len 40
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	DUID: <blah>
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option server ID, len 10
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	DUID: <blah>
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	get DHCP option client ID, len 14
            Jul 7 21:50:00 	dhcp6c 	38871 	receive advertise from <blah>:0%pppoe2 on pppoe2 
            

            pfSense CE 2.8.0

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Ok, yup that does look normal. It does log the received RAs which is what I expected.

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                chrcoluk @stephenw10
                last edited by chrcoluk

                @stephenw10 Ok as promised, here is the contents of the dhcp6c wan script from mpd.

                #!/bin/sh
                # This shell script launches /etc/rc.newwanipv6 with a interface argument.
                dmips=${new_domain_name_servers}
                dmnames=${new_domain_name}
                case $REASON in
                REBIND)
                /usr/bin/logger -t dhcp6c "dhcp6c rebind on pppoe2"
                ;;
                REQUEST|RELEASE)
                /usr/bin/logger -t dhcp6c "dhcp6c RELEASE, REQUEST or EXIT on pppoe2 running rc.newwanipv6"
                /usr/local/sbin/fcgicli -f /etc/rc.newwanipv6 -d "interface=pppoe2&dmnames=${dmnames}&dmips=${dmips}&reason=${REASON}"
                ;;
                RENEW|INFO)
                /usr/bin/logger -t dhcp6c "dhcp6c RENEW on pppoe2 running rc.newwanipv6"
                /usr/local/sbin/fcgicli -f /etc/rc.newwanipv6 -d "interface=pppoe2&dmnames=${dmnames}&dmips=${dmips}&reason=${REASON}"
                esac
                

                dhcp6c.conf for good measure

                interface pppoe2 {
                        send ia-na 0;   # request stateful address
                        request domain-name-servers;
                        request domain-name;
                        script "/var/etc/dhcp6c_wan_script.sh"; # we'd like some nameservers please
                };
                id-assoc na 0 { };
                

                On booting back up again in if_pppoe, there is now no obvious operational issues, no looping and IPv6 is assigned locally on the firewall WAN interface via DHCP6.

                This is with combined use of the patch made to stop the looping, and my own patch to delay execution of dhcp6c by 6 seconds.

                However I do have 3 instances of dhcp6c running. It was zero with the dhcp6 failing before I added the delay, but the delay may have added a side effect. I will look at interfaces.inc again to see if I can tidy this up and remove the duplication issue.

                --update

                I moved the sleep command prior to the lock check, also reduced it to 3 seconds, as I think 6 was excessive, I now have only one process, the pid file matches the actual pid, and everything looks clean now.

                Also looks like disabling dhcp6c debug, stops the hourly log noise. Explains why I didnt notice it before.

                pfSense CE 2.8.0

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Nice debugging. Now why would that be required for your connection.... 🤔

                  Can you show the new patch you've ended up using?

                  C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    chrcoluk @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 Yeah sure.

                    --- /etc/inc/interfaces.inc     2025-05-20 15:25:19.000000000 +0100
                    +++ /etc/inc/interfaces.inc        2025-07-07 19:48:09.639482000 +0100
                    @@ -4024,6 +4024,7 @@
                             * lock deleted.
                             */
                     
                    +        mwexec("/bin/sleep 3");
                            if (!file_exists("/tmp/dhcp6c_lock")) {
                                    kill_dhcp6client_process(true);
                                    /* Lock it to avoid multiple runs */
                    

                    Also

                    # ps ax | grep dhcp6
                    88258  -  Is      0:00.01 /usr/local/sbin/dhcp6c -d -c /var/etc/dhcp6c.conf -p /var/run/dhcp6c.pid pppoe2
                    99730  1  S+      0:00.00 grep --color dhcp6
                    
                    # cat /var/run/dhcp6c.pid 
                    88258
                    

                    pfSense CE 2.8.0

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • C
                      chrcoluk
                      last edited by

                      ISP is doing LNS maintenance over the upcoming week, so will see how that reconnection goes.

                      Also I patched mss clamping in the scrub code to make it 52 bytes instead of 40 for timestamps overhead, and wow things have never performed so good, so that combined with this driver is working really well for me now.

                      pfSense CE 2.8.0

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm did I miss something about timestamps? What did you discover that required that?

                        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • w0wW
                          w0w
                          last edited by

                          So, are we talking about RFC 1323 and a modification to /etc/inc/filter.inc?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            chrcoluk @stephenw10
                            last edited by chrcoluk

                            I noticed pfSense code if mss clamp is enabled just does the basic 40 bytes (IPv4) 60 bytes (IPv6) so e.g. a 1460 bytes MSS clamp on IPv4 with a 1500 byte MTU, I think it should be 1448 in such a scenario, so I changed the 40 bytes to 52, currently I have only patched the IPv4 code. Timestamps now days is on by default in operating systems and important on high bandwidth.

                            I did notice youtube videos had a stall before playing, as soon as I made this adjustment that has been fixed, and there is a wider improvement I am noticing as well.

                            It is a very basic patch as well. Modifying the firewall generation script, scrub rules.

                            w0w yes to both.

                                            /* set up MSS clamping */
                                            if ($mss) {
                                                    /* different size of IPv4/IPv6 header, https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11409 */
                            -                        $mssclamp4 = "max-mss " . ($mss - 40);
                            +                        $mssclamp4 = "max-mss " . ($mss - 52);
                            

                            mssclamp6 is right under that as well.

                            pfSense CE 2.8.0

                            w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • w0wW
                              w0w @chrcoluk
                              last edited by

                              @chrcoluk said in if_pppoe problems with php-fpm causing loops. (resolved):

                              I have only patched the IPv4 code

                              Why not both stacks?

                              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                chrcoluk @w0w
                                last edited by chrcoluk

                                @w0w I will do both stacks, it was something I did very quickly and I want to check if its still 12 bytes for ipv6 as well.

                                Patched it now. So on my 1500 bytes MTU, 1448 MSS for IPV4, 1428 MSS for IPv6.

                                pfSense CE 2.8.0

                                w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • w0wW
                                  w0w @chrcoluk
                                  last edited by

                                  @chrcoluk
                                  I did the same and even captured WAN packets to confirm. Looks like it's working — we'll see. By the way, I'm using gigabit PPPoE.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Hmm, interesting. I can't say I've noticed that. But also I wasn't looking for it specifically. 🤔

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S stephenw10 referenced this topic
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.