Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS Block and Redirect for IPv6

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    21 Posts 3 Posters 227 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      aGeekhere @aGeekhere
      last edited by aGeekhere

      @johnpoz I have DHCPv6 Static Mappings

      Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

      johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @aGeekhere
        last edited by johnpoz

        @aGeekhere not talking about the IP - I am talking about unbound ACL list. Do you have it set for auto, or did you turn that off and manually set it. If you query pfsense IPv6 normally do you get answers?

        Lets see a nslookup to pfsense IPv6 address - and then to something else. Your saying it works to pfsense IPv6 address but then you get a reject to something else that is redirected to loopback?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          aGeekhere @johnpoz
          last edited by aGeekhere

          @johnpoz I do no have any Access Lists and in the doc https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/dns-redirect.html

          Clients using DNS over TLS or DNS over HTTPS could circumvent this protection. Redirecting or blocking port 853 may help with DNS over TLS, depending on the clients.
          
          See Blocking External Client DNS Queries for additional advice.
          

          So far ipv4 as per the doc works, ipv6 seems to not work

          Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @aGeekhere
            last edited by johnpoz

            @aGeekhere - my point is that statement about the depending on the client - a sane client will validate the cert given back. If its not valid it won't work. One of the major points of both doh and dot is validation that your talking to who you think you are talking to - a dot client that doesn't validate the cert is utter shit.. what would use a shit client that doesn't validate the cert?

            If you are getting a reject - points to unbound ACL not allowing the query.

            Forget the dot redirect for a moment - and do a simple dig or nslookup query to pfsense IPv6, and then to some other IPv6 - do you get an answer when direct to ipv6 IP of pfsense, and then a reject on the redirect?

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GertjanG
              Gertjan @aGeekhere
              last edited by Gertjan

              @aGeekhere said in DNS Block and Redirect for IPv6:

              did i make an error or is it a bug?

              I've tried to do the same thing as you : NAT IPv6 DNS traffic to "::1".
              Guess what : for the usual reasons I could't make it work neither.
              Reading this wasn't motivating :
              be72b6c8-004e-43de-afc4-58ec2ff919e4-image.png

              Anyway.

              On my LAN, I added a IPv6 DNS NAT, NOT using "::1" , but the pfSense LAN IPv6.

              9b34bcd0-6276-4c14-a3be-75a251ad5125-image.png

              which produced this LAN firewall rule :

              be8831a9-4966-465c-9b66-a7382790255c-image.png

              Take note of the second rule that blocks all DNS IPv6 traffic.

              Test on the console/ssh :

              [25.07-RC][root@pfSense.brit-hotel-fumel.net]/root: dig @2001:4860:4860::8888 test-domaine.fr AAAA +short
              2001:41d0:2:927b::15

              ( means : I ask Google's IPv6 DNS, 2001:4860:4860::8888 to resolve test-domaine.fr for AAAA )
              That worked out.

              Now, from my PC :

              C:\Users\Gauche>nslookup
              Serveur par defaut :   pfSense.bhf.tld
              Address:  2a01:cb19:abcd:a6e2:92ec:77ff:fe29:392c
              > server 2001:4860:4860::8888
              Serveur par defaut :   dns.google
              Address:  2001:4860:4860::8888
              
              > test-domaine.fr
              Serveur :   dns.google
              Address:  2001:4860:4860::8888
              
              Réponse ne faisant pas autorité :
              Nom :    test-domaine.fr
              Addresses:  2001:41d0:2:927b::15
                        5.196.43.182
              

              I asked nslookup to use "2001:4860:4860::8888" as the DNS server which is Google IPv6 DNS (the modern 8.8.8.8).

              So .. I'm not sure. Redirecting to ::1 didn't worked.
              When I redirect to the pfSense IPv6 LAN IP ( 2a01:cb19:abcd:a6e2:92ec:77ff:fe29:392c ), it worked.
              So, we can't redirect to ::1 ?
              Ok, so be it.

              No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
              Edit : and where are the logs ??

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                aGeekhere @johnpoz
                last edited by aGeekhere

                @johnpoz Here is some output
                16292bc6-7695-43ed-9556-b8e3df8b6799-image.png

                Both block 1 and 2 which is ipv4 seems to be working correctly as per the doc

                Block 3 and 4 which is ipv6 does not look correct

                Unless i have not understood the doc or missed something.

                Update:
                @Gertjan Ah so you were able to recreate the issue, could this be a bug?

                Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GertjanG
                  Gertjan @aGeekhere
                  last edited by Gertjan

                  @aGeekhere said in DNS Block and Redirect for IPv6:

                  Ah so you were able to recreate the issue, could this be a bug?

                  Maybe, maybe not .. not sure. read above, as I got it working by not using ::1.

                  @johnpoz I wasn't even trying to use 853 is DNS over TLS, as I can't map out that rabbit hole right now ......
                  Just good old plain port 53 DNS UDP and TCP.

                  No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                  Edit : and where are the logs ??

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    aGeekhere @Gertjan
                    last edited by aGeekhere

                    @Gertjan Because if you read here https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/dns-redirect.html

                    It uses 127.0.0.1 as the ipv4 loopback address so i would have though that for ipv6 you would use ::1 as the loop back address. If ::1 does not work what can be used for a loop back address for ipv6?

                    Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                    GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GertjanG
                      Gertjan @aGeekhere
                      last edited by

                      @aGeekhere said in DNS Block and Redirect for IPv6:

                      what can be used

                      See above :

                      @Gertjan said in DNS Block and Redirect for IPv6:

                      When I redirect to the pfSense IPv6 LAN IP ( 2a01:cb19:abcd:a6e2:92ec:77ff:fe29:392c ), it worked.

                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A
                        aGeekhere @Gertjan
                        last edited by aGeekhere

                        @Gertjan Ok going to try switching it from ::1 to pfsense LAN ipv6 address. Will report back with results.

                        Update: More testing is needed but i think that worked.

                        Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @aGeekhere
                          last edited by

                          @aGeekhere might be related to having to be the same scope

                          nat.jpg

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GertjanG
                            Gertjan @johnpoz
                            last edited by

                            @johnpoz

                            That's the same image / conclusion I posted above ^^

                            But I'm not using link-local "fe80" stuff.
                            I can see the IPv6 DNS port 53 traffic using packet capturing.
                            It's the IPv6 GUA = the ddevice's LAN IPv6 being used.

                            Anyway, redirecting to ::1 is not what worked before like using 127.0.0.1. ...

                            Maybe I'll use AI for this one 😊

                            No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                            Edit : and where are the logs ??

                            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Gertjan
                              last edited by

                              @Gertjan oh I missed that - my bad.

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.