Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    53 Posts 7 Posters 1.2k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • LaxarusL Offline
      Laxarus @Averlon
      last edited by Laxarus

      @Averlon what would you suggest for other BIOS power settings? Can pfSense manage power well enough for me to disable BIOS control? From my testing, when I let pfSense manage the power, it did not go over the 2200 limit (or I put some wrong settings in the BIOS and got stuck at 2200 when I let pfsense handle the power management)

      w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • w0wW Offline
        w0w @Laxarus
        last edited by

        @Laxarus
        152d9ae8-3d7b-4379-83ce-30dd47ad22f5-image.png
        And never getting closer with your settings.

        This is what I am using on a Windows machine

        iperf3 -c 192.168.40.40 -P 8 -t 30 -O 3 -w 2M -N -R
        

        As @stephenw10 already said, this is not a CPU frequency issue, this is just maximum reported by pfSense.

        @Laxarus said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

        I cannot afford testing this hardware in a virtual environment. This is currently in production and there is no backup for it.

        Are you using UEFI mode and SATA drive or this is NVME installation?

        LaxarusL 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • LaxarusL Offline
          Laxarus @w0w
          last edited by

          @w0w ı was using legacy but switched to uefi later thinking this will improve things but it did not change anything. Installation is on a m.2 nvme.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • stephenw10S Offline
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Mmm, drive speed and boot type really shouldn't make any difference to throughput.

            You could be hitting some bus limit perhaps. Some hardware off-loading not playing nicely?

            w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • w0wW Offline
              w0w @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

              about 2 hours ago

              Mmm, drive speed and boot type really shouldn't make any difference to throughput.

              This makes a difference if we want to migrate to a Proxmox VM. When a SATA drive is used, you can prepare a new drive with Proxmox and a pfSense VM on another system, then just move it over and reassign the interfaces in Proxmox. Just use a USB Ethernet adapter as the management interface on both PCs. With NVMe it can be more complicated and may require more downtime.

              @Laxarus try the iperf command provided in my previous message and post back the results.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S Offline
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Right but no difference to the the throughput of the resulting install.

                w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • w0wW Offline
                  w0w @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

                  about 2 hours ago

                  Right but no difference to the the throughput of the resulting install.

                  Definitely yes. 😁

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    pwood999 @Averlon
                    last edited by

                    @Averlon The reason I suggest testing each server to & from PfSense was just to verify that part of the E2E path - especially as the 25G link is used for all VLAN's to the Microtik.

                    Server1 --> Microtik --> PfSense (DS & US)
                    Server2 --> Microtik --> PfSense (DS & US)

                    It would at least verify the firewall rules on the VLAN's & the VLAN's through the Microtik can pass the full bandwidth.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • LaxarusL Offline
                      Laxarus @w0w
                      last edited by

                      @w0w said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

                      @Laxarus try the iperf command provided in my previous message and post back the results.

                      still 5G and occasional 6G

                      @Averlon said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

                      My suggestion is to disable HT / SMT, scale queues down to 4 and there might be another improvement. The Intel SpeedShift may work better on packed level rather than core level.

                      disabled HT but this did not make any difference

                      w0wW A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • w0wW Offline
                        w0w @Laxarus
                        last edited by

                        @Laxarus said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

                        still 5G and occasional 6G

                        OK, so how exactly is the Intel XXV710 dual 25G connected to the Ubiquiti switch, and what is the exact switch model, ports, cables, and transceivers you’re using if any?

                        LaxarusL 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • LaxarusL Offline
                          Laxarus @w0w
                          last edited by Laxarus

                          @w0w
                          Switch: USW-EnterpriseXG-24
                          Connection: Unifi SFP28 DAC cable (UC-DAC-SFP28)

                          24e328d6-c156-4512-b704-358648d223b3-image.png

                          I disabled the LAGG so there is only a single cable now.

                          Do you think these cables dont play nice with pfsense?

                          But I also tested the 10g rj-45 built-in port but still no difference so I've ruled this out.

                          At this point, I am entertaining the idea of putting all 10G devices in same vlan/switch and stick with L2.

                          w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • w0wW Offline
                            w0w @Laxarus
                            last edited by

                            @Laxarus said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

                            Do you think these cables dont play nice with pfsense?

                            I don’t think so. The more I look at it, the more I think it’s some software glitch — but where exactly is the bottleneck? It looks just like some queues/limiters. This CPU should do 30-40 Gbit with fw filtering and 60 Gbit just for routing. I don’t know — something is broken.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P Offline
                              pwood999
                              last edited by pwood999

                              Maybe share your PfSense config, with any public IP's, Certs, etc. obfuscated ?

                              Or just screenshots of the VLAN firewall rules & any Limiter/Shaper queue settings ?

                              Check this post or an XML Redactor that might be helpful.
                              link redactor

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                Averlon @Laxarus
                                last edited by Averlon

                                @Laxarus said in Cannot Achieve 10g pfsense bottleneck:

                                disabled HT but this did not make any difference

                                Did you configure the NIC queues down to 4 as well and tested SpeedShift at Package Level? The hwpstate_intel driver works quite well with Broadwell CPUs and does shown improvements (according to your post) towards 6Gbps on your Skylake CPUs. Compared to your previous posted results, this is an improvement of almost 1Gbps.

                                How is the throughput if you disable the firewall (pfctl -d) and use pfsense as router only. NAT won't be available once you disable the firewall. You can re-enable by running pfctl -e and it will load your last ruleset. If you don't see any significant difference with firewall disabled, you can be at least sure, it's not the firewall ruleset slowing things down.

                                What about the interface counter on that Ubiquiti switch, especially the ones for the 25gbps Uplinks - are there any error counter / drops shown?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.