Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Multiple Interface Shaping

    Traffic Shaping
    6
    14
    7.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      msamblanet
      last edited by

      I have VOIP on an optional interface and P2P traffic on my LAN interface and would like to shape the two.

      I found some old posts indicating it was not possible back in October and being worked on but did not see any follow-ups…

      My attempts to just try it were not successful - I got some very wierd shaping rules...is this supposed to be currently possible or is it still off in the future?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by

        Not supported for 1.0.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          iimre
          last edited by

          … and what if the OPT and LAN are bridged, isn't it possible to create shapeing for lan which will affect the bridged OPT as well?
          Sorry, if it is too stupid question.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sullrich
            last edited by

            Not sure.  Give it a try and report back.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              iimre
              last edited by

              @sullrich:

              Not sure.  Give it a try and report back.

              As per the first tests it seems to be working  :)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                billm
                last edited by

                @iimre:

                @sullrich:

                Not sure.  Give it a try and report back.

                As per the first tests it seems to be working  :)

                Interesting, considering ALTQ won't be bound to the OPT interface.  Outbound traffic will be shaped however regardless of interface (and OPT->LAN will be shaped to the downstream connection speed).

                –Bill

                pfSense core developer
                blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                twitter - billmarquette

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • I
                  iimre
                  last edited by

                  @billm:

                  Interesting, considering ALTQ won't be bound to the OPT interface.  Outbound traffic will be shaped however regardless of interface (and OPT->LAN will be shaped to the downstream connection speed).

                  –Bill

                  You are right. Testing a litlle bit more, it seems that speed is
                  O.K. WAN–>LAN
                  O.K. WAN-->OPT
                  (when downloading from  internet at the same time to a wlan and lan client, traffic shared roughly equally)
                  (O.K. LAN-->OPT (the limit was the wifi speed)
                  and really it seems to be limited to WAN outgoing speed at the OPT-->LAN relation.
                  Is there any way to solve this?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    billm
                    last edited by

                    @iimre:

                    @billm:

                    Interesting, considering ALTQ won't be bound to the OPT interface.  Outbound traffic will be shaped however regardless of interface (and OPT->LAN will be shaped to the downstream connection speed).

                    –Bill

                    You are right. Testing a litlle bit more, it seems that speed is
                    O.K. WAN–>LAN
                    O.K. WAN-->OPT
                    (when downloading from  internet at the same time to a wlan and lan client, traffic shared roughly equally)
                    (O.K. LAN-->OPT (the limit was the wifi speed)
                    and really it seems to be limited to WAN outgoing speed at the OPT-->LAN relation.
                    Is there any way to solve this?

                    Not at this time.

                    –Bill

                    pfSense core developer
                    blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                    twitter - billmarquette

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      charles.regan
                      last edited by

                      We really need a traffic shaper for multiple interfaces. If I donate will this accelerate the process..  ;)

                      Charles

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sullrich
                        last edited by

                        I'm sure it will but let me point out 1.0 is frozen, this will not make it into 1.0.

                        With that said, donate away to Bill, he needs new toys!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          billm
                          last edited by

                          @charles.regan:

                          We really need a traffic shaper for multiple interfaces. If I donate will this accelerate the process..  ;)

                          Charles

                          As Scott mentioned, 1.0 is frozen.  Development has started for 1.1, so get your requests in early.  I've got interface choosing done already (not multiple interfaces, but at least you get to make a choice as to which interfaces you want shaped) and am working on layer 7 shaping decisions.  Multiple interfaces is a possibility, but it's going to be a while before it's in anything but the next alpha (donations might help get it to alpha quicker as I've got other projects I really wanna work on other than the shaper).

                          See http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BillM

                          –Bill

                          pfSense core developer
                          blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                          twitter - billmarquette

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            agismaniax
                            last edited by

                            I'm trying pfSense BETA iso in my testing machine.
                            pfSense probed my NIC:

                            • DLink DFE-580TX as ste0, ste1, ste2, ste3
                            • Compex as wb0
                            • NForce2 as nve0

                            I use nve0 as my LAN with speed 100Mb and ste0, ste1, ste2 as my WAN with speed 100Mb.
                            It seems pfSense didn't support multiple interface shaping.
                            Is there any workarround to enable this feature?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              sullrich
                              last edited by

                              Not at this time.  Patches accepted.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                billm
                                last edited by

                                @sullrich:

                                Not at this time.  Patches accepted.

                                Patches accepted (although I know exactly what needs to be done, I backed out the code for this back in June due to other issues) - but be warned the shaper is under heavy development, you will want to coordinate any work you do with me.

                                Or again, donations are accepted - at this point a quiet machine with Intel FXPs would be appreciated.  I can no longer do shaper development on my (silent) Soekris as there's an OS level bug that affects the NICs on this machine.

                                –Bill

                                pfSense core developer
                                blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                                twitter - billmarquette

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.