• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Multiple Interface Shaping

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
14 Posts 6 Posters 7.1k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M
    msamblanet
    last edited by Dec 26, 2005, 3:24 AM

    I have VOIP on an optional interface and P2P traffic on my LAN interface and would like to shape the two.

    I found some old posts indicating it was not possible back in October and being worked on but did not see any follow-ups…

    My attempts to just try it were not successful - I got some very wierd shaping rules...is this supposed to be currently possible or is it still off in the future?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      sullrich
      last edited by Dec 26, 2005, 3:37 AM

      Not supported for 1.0.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • I
        iimre
        last edited by Dec 28, 2005, 9:54 PM

        … and what if the OPT and LAN are bridged, isn't it possible to create shapeing for lan which will affect the bridged OPT as well?
        Sorry, if it is too stupid question.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sullrich
          last edited by Dec 28, 2005, 10:00 PM

          Not sure.  Give it a try and report back.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • I
            iimre
            last edited by Dec 31, 2005, 1:26 PM

            @sullrich:

            Not sure.  Give it a try and report back.

            As per the first tests it seems to be working  :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              billm
              last edited by Dec 31, 2005, 4:48 PM

              @iimre:

              @sullrich:

              Not sure.  Give it a try and report back.

              As per the first tests it seems to be working  :)

              Interesting, considering ALTQ won't be bound to the OPT interface.  Outbound traffic will be shaped however regardless of interface (and OPT->LAN will be shaped to the downstream connection speed).

              –Bill

              pfSense core developer
              blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
              twitter - billmarquette

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • I
                iimre
                last edited by Dec 31, 2005, 6:57 PM

                @billm:

                Interesting, considering ALTQ won't be bound to the OPT interface.  Outbound traffic will be shaped however regardless of interface (and OPT->LAN will be shaped to the downstream connection speed).

                –Bill

                You are right. Testing a litlle bit more, it seems that speed is
                O.K. WAN–>LAN
                O.K. WAN-->OPT
                (when downloading from  internet at the same time to a wlan and lan client, traffic shared roughly equally)
                (O.K. LAN-->OPT (the limit was the wifi speed)
                and really it seems to be limited to WAN outgoing speed at the OPT-->LAN relation.
                Is there any way to solve this?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  billm
                  last edited by Dec 31, 2005, 7:52 PM

                  @iimre:

                  @billm:

                  Interesting, considering ALTQ won't be bound to the OPT interface.  Outbound traffic will be shaped however regardless of interface (and OPT->LAN will be shaped to the downstream connection speed).

                  –Bill

                  You are right. Testing a litlle bit more, it seems that speed is
                  O.K. WAN–>LAN
                  O.K. WAN-->OPT
                  (when downloading from  internet at the same time to a wlan and lan client, traffic shared roughly equally)
                  (O.K. LAN-->OPT (the limit was the wifi speed)
                  and really it seems to be limited to WAN outgoing speed at the OPT-->LAN relation.
                  Is there any way to solve this?

                  Not at this time.

                  –Bill

                  pfSense core developer
                  blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                  twitter - billmarquette

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    charles.regan
                    last edited by Jan 5, 2006, 12:54 PM

                    We really need a traffic shaper for multiple interfaces. If I donate will this accelerate the process..  ;)

                    Charles

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sullrich
                      last edited by Jan 5, 2006, 9:38 PM

                      I'm sure it will but let me point out 1.0 is frozen, this will not make it into 1.0.

                      With that said, donate away to Bill, he needs new toys!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        billm
                        last edited by Jan 7, 2006, 7:03 AM

                        @charles.regan:

                        We really need a traffic shaper for multiple interfaces. If I donate will this accelerate the process..  ;)

                        Charles

                        As Scott mentioned, 1.0 is frozen.  Development has started for 1.1, so get your requests in early.  I've got interface choosing done already (not multiple interfaces, but at least you get to make a choice as to which interfaces you want shaped) and am working on layer 7 shaping decisions.  Multiple interfaces is a possibility, but it's going to be a while before it's in anything but the next alpha (donations might help get it to alpha quicker as I've got other projects I really wanna work on other than the shaper).

                        See http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BillM

                        –Bill

                        pfSense core developer
                        blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                        twitter - billmarquette

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A
                          agismaniax
                          last edited by Feb 27, 2006, 8:11 AM

                          I'm trying pfSense BETA iso in my testing machine.
                          pfSense probed my NIC:

                          • DLink DFE-580TX as ste0, ste1, ste2, ste3
                          • Compex as wb0
                          • NForce2 as nve0

                          I use nve0 as my LAN with speed 100Mb and ste0, ste1, ste2 as my WAN with speed 100Mb.
                          It seems pfSense didn't support multiple interface shaping.
                          Is there any workarround to enable this feature?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            sullrich
                            last edited by Feb 27, 2006, 5:46 PM

                            Not at this time.  Patches accepted.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              billm
                              last edited by Feb 28, 2006, 2:08 PM

                              @sullrich:

                              Not at this time.  Patches accepted.

                              Patches accepted (although I know exactly what needs to be done, I backed out the code for this back in June due to other issues) - but be warned the shaper is under heavy development, you will want to coordinate any work you do with me.

                              Or again, donations are accepted - at this point a quiet machine with Intel FXPs would be appreciated.  I can no longer do shaper development on my (silent) Soekris as there's an OS level bug that affects the NICs on this machine.

                              –Bill

                              pfSense core developer
                              blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
                              twitter - billmarquette

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                consent.not_received