Load Balancer stopped Balancing

townsenk

I have a basic dual Wan single lan configuration. All was working well before the latest snapshot.

I often test the configuration by going to one of the many "whatismyip" websites and by refreshing the screen, and as expected I can see the gateway ip change back and forth.

I upgraded to snapshot dated Sep 10 05:09:52 EDT 2010 without any configuration changes and all outgoing traffic is stuck going through my wan interface. The only way I can force it to use the opt1 interface is if I make that gateway my default. and it sticks there never toggling back.

I reverted back to snapshot dated Thu Sep 9 18:39:54 EDT 2010 (again, without any configuration changes) and all works well

I am getting these errors in the logs
Sep 10 18:45:01 php: : The gateway: loadbalance is invalid/unkown not using it.
Sep 10 18:45:01 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.

"loadbalance" being the name of my gateway group

Any ideas?

cmb

There are issues with dynamic gateways, go back to Monday's snapshot.

townsenk

Using Mondays snapshot and all seems well again…

townsenk

Are the issues being worked? Theres been at least three snapshots and I couldn't find anything about it in the bug reports.

I'm just concerned that it may only be an issue affecting my configuration. And if thats the case, I have some work to do on my end.

Can anyone verify that this problem exists?

again heres the system log output

Sep 11 12:15:38 last message repeated 12 times
Sep 11 12:15:38 php: : The gateway: loadbalance is invalid/unkown not using it.
Sep 11 12:15:37 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.

townsenk

I've got things narrowed down a bit.
I reversed patched the revisions Ermal made two days ago and my loadbalancing/gateway problem disappeared.

REV 3d471a14 and 68f291ff Bug #876

I plan on doing a clean reload once the issue is addressed but currently I'm happy with the fact that things are back up and running

I don't have the talents to fix the issue but I thought I would give you an idea where to look.

ivanmar

Can you specify your configuration of opt interface. Is is pppoe dynamic? Is your configuration based on vlans?

jarruda

Same problem here with latest snapshot.
Using 2 WAN Interfaces with Static IP Address.

townsenk

Issue still exists with latest snapshot (14 sep).

eri--

Can you give ifconfig output and /var/etc/apinger.conf and /tmp/apinger.status?

townsenk

ifconfig output

rl0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8 <vlan_mtu>ether 00:11:95:1d:60:22
inet 192.168.22.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.22.255
inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe1d:6022%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
dc0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
options=80008 <vlan_mtu,linkstate>ether 00:08:a1:83:08:74
inet6 fe80::208:a1ff:fe83:874%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet 68.1.124.153 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 68.1.125.255
nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
dc1: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
options=80008 <vlan_mtu,linkstate>ether 00:1a:70:0f:cc:fd
inet 24.249.193.155 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 24.249.193.159
inet6 fe80::21a:70ff:fe0f:ccfd%dc1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
plip0: flags=8810 <pointopoint,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
pflog0: flags=100 <promisc>metric 0 mtu 33200
enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
lo0: flags=8049 <up,loopback,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 16384
options=3 <rxcsum,txcsum>inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460
syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128
ovpns1: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
options=80000 <linkstate>inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe1d:6022%ovpns1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
inet 10.0.8.1 –> 10.0.8.2 netmask 0xffffffff
nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>Opened by PID 16567

apinger.conf

pfSense apinger configuration file. Automatically Generated!

User and group the pinger should run as

user "root"
group "wheel"

Mailer to use (default: "/usr/lib/sendmail -t")

#mailer "/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"

Location of the pid-file (default: "/var/run/apinger.pid")

pid_file "/var/run/apinger.pid"

Format of timestamp (%s macro) (default: "%b %d %H:%M:%S")

#timestamp_format "%Y%m%d%H%M%S"

status {

File where the status information whould be written to

file "/tmp/apinger.status"

Interval between file updates

when 0 or not set, file is written only when SIGUSR1 is received

interval 10s
}

########################################

RRDTool status gathering configuration

Interval between RRD updates

rrd interval 60s;

These parameters can be overriden in a specific alarm configuration

alarm default {
command on "/usr/local/sbin/pfSctl -c 'filter reload'"
command off "/usr/local/sbin/pfSctl -c 'filter reload'"
combine 10s
}

"Down" alarm definition.

This alarm will be fired when target doesn't respond for 30 seconds.

alarm down "down" {
time 10s
}

"Delay" alarm definition.

This alarm will be fired when responses are delayed more than 200ms

it will be canceled, when the delay drops below 100ms

alarm delay "delay" {
delay_low 200ms
delay_high 500ms
}

"Loss" alarm definition.

This alarm will be fired when packet loss goes over 20%

it will be canceled, when the loss drops below 10%

alarm loss "loss" {
percent_low 10
percent_high 20
}

target default {

How often the probe should be sent

interval 1s

How many replies should be used to compute average delay

for controlling "delay" alarms

avg_delay_samples 10

How many probes should be used to compute average loss

avg_loss_samples 50

The delay (in samples) after which loss is computed

without this delays larger than interval would be treated as loss

avg_loss_delay_samples 20

Names of the alarms that may be generated for the target

alarms "down","delay","loss"

Location of the RRD

#rrd file "/var/db/rrd/apinger-%t.rrd"
}
target "24.249.193.129" {
description "GW_WAN2"
srcip "24.249.193.155"
alarms override "loss","delay","down";
rrd file "/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN2-quality.rrd"
}

target "24.249.193.129" {
description "GW_WAN2"
srcip "24.249.193.155"
alarms override "loss","delay","down";
rrd file "/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN2-quality.rrd"
}

target "68.1.124.1" {
description "GW_WAN1"
srcip "68.1.124.153"
alarms override "loss","delay","down";
rrd file "/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN1-quality.rrd"
}

apinger.status

24.249.193.129|24.249.193.155|GW_WAN2|19074|19070|1284569183|9.139ms|0.0%|none
68.1.124.1|68.1.124.153|GW_WAN1|19074|19073|1284569183|12.777ms|0.0%|none</performnud,accept_rtadv></linkstate></up,pointopoint,running,multicast></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum></up,loopback,running,multicast></promisc></pointopoint,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></vlan_mtu,linkstate></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></vlan_mtu,linkstate></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>

townsenk

There is also another error concerning a gateway file that is displayed on the console while booting from /etc/inc/gwlb.inc
If you can tell me where this logfile is located I provide the exact verbage from that log as well

Thank you

eri--

All should be fixed on snapshots later than this post.

I just wanted to chime in and say thanks to the OP and everyone else who contributed, I've been trying to resolve my load balancing issues for the last few days and I just now got around to checking the forums. While I could have saved a good amount of time by checking the forums sooner, finding that the problem has been brought up and addressed is really pleasing. Anyway, thanks to everyone I look forward to having functional load balancing again. Cheers.

~infinityv~

jimp

That snapshot was not built after Ermal's post. A lot of work was done yesterday afternoon, and there hasn't been a new snap since then (the builder hasn't produced a usable snapshot run)

You could try to gitsync and then try again, but iirc you will also need new apinger and check_reload_status/pfSctl binaries so it might break things.

Just wait and try on the next new one.

jimp

The most recent snapshot (and the one you posted the timestamp from) was from yesterday morning, not today.

townsenk

With the new snapshot some outbound loadbalancing seems to be happening, However under Status/Gateways/Gateway Groups still show the gateways as "unknown".

and this still appears in the system log

Sep 16 20:15:01 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.

Looks like a partial fix…

jimp

There are even more fixes that didn't make it into that snapshot, but the next one should be building now that has them… Though it should be safe to gitsync from today's snap up to current code.

townsenk

Thanks I'll give it a try

townsenk

I gitsynced. Instead of displaying "unknown" it says "Gathering Data"

I'll see what tomorrows snapshot does…

trunglam

I used snapshost 2.0-BETA4 (i386) built on Sat Sep 18 22:12:31 EDT 2010
but Load Balancing outbound still error with

Sep 21 08:45:13 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.
and gateway information is
Tier 1
WANGW, Gathering data
OPT1GW, Gathering data

Wait for good snapshost