Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Load Balancer stopped Balancing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    31 Posts 13 Posters 16.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      townsenk
      last edited by

      Are the issues being worked? Theres been at least three snapshots and I couldn't find anything about it in the bug reports.

      I'm just concerned that it may only be an issue affecting my configuration. And if thats the case, I have some work to do on my end.

      Can anyone verify that this problem exists?

      again heres the system log output

      Sep 11 12:15:38 last message repeated 12 times
      Sep 11 12:15:38 php: : The gateway: loadbalance is invalid/unkown not using it.
      Sep 11 12:15:37 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        townsenk
        last edited by

        I've got things narrowed down a bit.
        I reversed patched the revisions Ermal made two days ago and my loadbalancing/gateway problem disappeared.

        REV 3d471a14 and 68f291ff  Bug #876

        I plan on doing a clean reload once the issue is addressed but currently I'm happy with the fact that things are back up and running

        I don't have the talents to fix the issue but I thought I would give you an idea where to look.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          ivanmar
          last edited by

          Can you specify your configuration of opt interface. Is is pppoe dynamic? Is your configuration based on vlans?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jarruda
            last edited by

            Same problem here with latest snapshot.
            Using 2 WAN Interfaces with Static IP Address.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              townsenk
              last edited by

              Issue still exists with latest snapshot (14 sep).

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                eri--
                last edited by

                Can you give ifconfig output and /var/etc/apinger.conf and /tmp/apinger.status?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  townsenk
                  last edited by

                  ifconfig output

                  rl0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                          options=8 <vlan_mtu>ether 00:11:95:1d:60:22
                          inet 192.168.22.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.22.255
                          inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe1d:6022%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
                          nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
                          status: active
                  dc0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                          options=80008 <vlan_mtu,linkstate>ether 00:08:a1:83:08:74
                          inet6 fe80::208:a1ff:fe83:874%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
                          inet 68.1.124.153 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 68.1.125.255
                          nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
                          status: active
                  dc1: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                          options=80008 <vlan_mtu,linkstate>ether 00:1a:70:0f:cc:fd
                          inet 24.249.193.155 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 24.249.193.159
                          inet6 fe80::21a:70ff:fe0f:ccfd%dc1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
                          nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
                          status: active
                  plip0: flags=8810 <pointopoint,simplex,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                  pflog0: flags=100 <promisc>metric 0 mtu 33200
                  enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536
                  lo0: flags=8049 <up,loopback,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 16384
                          options=3 <rxcsum,txcsum>inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
                          inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
                          inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
                          nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460
                          syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128
                  ovpns1: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                          options=80000 <linkstate>inet6 fe80::211:95ff:fe1d:6022%ovpns1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
                          inet 10.0.8.1 –> 10.0.8.2 netmask 0xffffffff
                          nd6 options=3 <performnud,accept_rtadv>Opened by PID 16567

                  apinger.conf

                  pfSense apinger configuration file. Automatically Generated!

                  User and group the pinger should run as

                  user "root"
                  group "wheel"

                  Mailer to use (default: "/usr/lib/sendmail -t")

                  #mailer "/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"

                  Location of the pid-file (default: "/var/run/apinger.pid")

                  pid_file "/var/run/apinger.pid"

                  Format of timestamp (%s macro) (default: "%b %d %H:%M:%S")

                  #timestamp_format "%Y%m%d%H%M%S"

                  status {

                  File where the status information whould be written to

                  file "/tmp/apinger.status"

                  Interval between file updates

                  when 0 or not set, file is written only when SIGUSR1 is received

                  interval 10s
                  }

                  ########################################

                  RRDTool status gathering configuration

                  Interval between RRD updates

                  rrd interval 60s;

                  These parameters can be overriden in a specific alarm configuration

                  alarm default {
                  command on "/usr/local/sbin/pfSctl -c 'filter reload'"
                  command off "/usr/local/sbin/pfSctl -c 'filter reload'"
                  combine 10s
                  }

                  "Down" alarm definition.

                  This alarm will be fired when target doesn't respond for 30 seconds.

                  alarm down "down" {
                  time 10s
                  }

                  "Delay" alarm definition.

                  This alarm will be fired when responses are delayed more than 200ms

                  it will be canceled, when the delay drops below 100ms

                  alarm delay "delay" {
                  delay_low 200ms
                  delay_high 500ms
                  }

                  "Loss" alarm definition.

                  This alarm will be fired when packet loss goes over 20%

                  it will be canceled, when the loss drops below 10%

                  alarm loss "loss" {
                  percent_low 10
                  percent_high 20
                  }

                  target default {

                  How often the probe should be sent

                  interval 1s

                  How many replies should be used to compute average delay

                  for controlling "delay" alarms

                  avg_delay_samples 10

                  How many probes should be used to compute average loss

                  avg_loss_samples 50

                  The delay (in samples) after which loss is computed

                  without this delays larger than interval would be treated as loss

                  avg_loss_delay_samples 20

                  Names of the alarms that may be generated for the target

                  alarms "down","delay","loss"

                  Location of the RRD

                  #rrd file "/var/db/rrd/apinger-%t.rrd"
                  }
                  target "24.249.193.129" {
                  description "GW_WAN2"
                  srcip "24.249.193.155"
                  alarms override "loss","delay","down";
                  rrd file "/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN2-quality.rrd"
                  }

                  target "24.249.193.129" {
                  description "GW_WAN2"
                  srcip "24.249.193.155"
                  alarms override "loss","delay","down";
                  rrd file "/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN2-quality.rrd"
                  }

                  target "68.1.124.1" {
                  description "GW_WAN1"
                  srcip "68.1.124.153"
                  alarms override "loss","delay","down";
                  rrd file "/var/db/rrd/GW_WAN1-quality.rrd"
                  }

                  apinger.status

                  24.249.193.129|24.249.193.155|GW_WAN2|19074|19070|1284569183|9.139ms|0.0%|none
                  68.1.124.1|68.1.124.153|GW_WAN1|19074|19073|1284569183|12.777ms|0.0%|none</performnud,accept_rtadv></linkstate></up,pointopoint,running,multicast></performnud,accept_rtadv></rxcsum,txcsum></up,loopback,running,multicast></promisc></pointopoint,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></vlan_mtu,linkstate></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></vlan_mtu,linkstate></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></performnud,accept_rtadv></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    townsenk
                    last edited by

                    There is also another error concerning a gateway file that is displayed on the console while booting from /etc/inc/gwlb.inc
                    If you can tell me where this logfile is located I provide the exact verbage from that log as well

                    Thank you

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      eri--
                      last edited by

                      All should be fixed on snapshots later than this post.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        Guest
                        last edited by

                        I just wanted to chime in and say thanks to the OP and everyone else who contributed, I've been trying to resolve my load balancing issues for the last few days and I just now got around to checking the forums. While I could have saved a good amount of time by checking the forums sooner, finding that the problem has been brought up and addressed is really pleasing. Anyway, thanks to everyone I look forward to having functional load balancing again. Cheers.

                        ~infinityv~

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          That snapshot was not built after Ermal's post. A lot of work was done yesterday afternoon, and there hasn't been a new snap since then (the builder hasn't produced a usable snapshot run)

                          You could try to gitsync and then try again, but iirc you will also need new apinger and check_reload_status/pfSctl binaries so it might break things.

                          Just wait and try on the next new one.

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • jimpJ
                            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                            last edited by

                            The most recent snapshot (and the one you posted the timestamp from) was from yesterday morning, not today.

                            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                            Do not Chat/PM for help!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T
                              townsenk
                              last edited by

                              With the new snapshot some outbound loadbalancing seems to be happening, However under Status/Gateways/Gateway Groups still show the gateways as "unknown".

                              and this still appears in the system log

                              Sep 16 20:15:01 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.

                              Looks like a partial fix…

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jimpJ
                                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                last edited by

                                There are even more fixes that didn't make it into that snapshot, but the next one should be building now that has them… Though it should be safe to gitsync from today's snap up to current code.

                                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T
                                  townsenk
                                  last edited by

                                  Thanks I'll give it a try

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T
                                    townsenk
                                    last edited by

                                    I gitsynced. Instead of displaying "unknown" it says "Gathering Data"

                                    I'll see what tomorrows snapshot does…

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      trunglam
                                      last edited by

                                      I used snapshost 2.0-BETA4 (i386) built on Sat Sep 18 22:12:31 EDT 2010
                                      but Load Balancing outbound still error with

                                      Sep 21 08:45:13 php: : Gateways status could not be determined, considering all as up/active.
                                      and gateway information is
                                      Tier 1
                                      WANGW, Gathering data
                                      OPT1GW, Gathering data

                                      Wait for good snapshost

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        muffin
                                        last edited by

                                        Also having this issue.
                                        Currently running:
                                        2.0-BETA4  (i386)
                                        built on Sat Sep 18 23:15:00 EDT 2010

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • N
                                          n1ko
                                          last edited by

                                          Issues here too on the 18th snapshot. Some times it doesnt gather data,other times it gathers but loadbalancing still dont work and failover doesnt seem to be working either. Randomly it balances ok, but failover seems to be never working…

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • R
                                            roi
                                            last edited by

                                            In my case, failover is working fine.
                                            Both my GW's are set as Tire1 and when one of them fail (happens at least once a day  >:( ) it keep on by sending all traffic on the other interface.

                                            Version 2.0-BETA4 (i386)
                                            AMD Athlon™ XP 2000+

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.