LoadBalancing and Traffic Shaper
-
Does Load Balancing work without Traffic Shaping ?
Further remember, that there are some protocols/ports which do NOT allow load Balancing.Do you use any other packages like squid an so on ?
Which version/snapshot do you use ? -
No it doesnt work with disabled traffic shaping too :-( !
I'm using the beta4 snapshot from 17.12.2010.As soon as i switch from default to the Main gateway group all internet connections stop working.
Is there a bug in this snapshot version? -
I updated to snapshot-20.04.2010 but nothing changes…
i get these information from system logs:
kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.155.4
kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.155.2These are the ip adresses from the gw_wan2 and gw_wan3 ...
-
These to Gateways are in the same subnet…not sure, if this works !?
-
192.168.155.4 and 155.2 are two fritzbox routers for the A-DSL connections…
Only Wan1 is in another subnet.Do i have to put the fritzbox routers in another subnet to get things work?
Can't imagine that cause everything (except sticky connections and traffic shaping) worked fine under pfsense 1.2.3 -
I have the same errors in the log, but my connections are not on the same subnet, Traffic Shaping is not getting more packages from VOIP
-
I've tried to set up traffic shaper with the wizard and got this message:
"There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: should have one default queue on pppoe0pfctl: errors in altq config - The line in question reads [ should have one default queue on pppoe0 pfctl]: …"
I am on 2.0-BETA4 (i386) built on Mon Dec 20 22:18:43 EST 2010 embedded (nanobsd) on Alix board.
I've 1 WAN , 1 wired + 1 wlan bridged (bridge0 as LAN). My aim with shaper is to provide everyone a fair bandwidth to wan and do not let anyone to seize the whole bandwidth.
If the wizard doesn't create the default queue, how can I do it? -
Hi
I have a similar issue with 2010-12-20 snapshot.
I have configured two WAN (WAN and WAN2) and setup a group in System=>Routing=>Group. I set "Tier 1" for the 2 Interface Dynamic Gateway WAN and WAN2, set "Trigger Level" to "Member Down" and saved the group. I have reported the group in my first rule in "Firewall"=>"Rules"=>"LAN", in "Gateway" item. But if I plug off WAN1, WAN2 is not used and traffic is stopped.
Another issue. When I click on Status=>RRD Graph, I have message:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '{' in /usr/local/www/status_rrd_graph.php on line 243 -
I am having the same issue, on the latest snapshot
-
Try latest snapshots fixed.
-
@ermal:
Try latest snapshots fixed.
Seems to be O.K. now.
Thanks -
I have upgraded to snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010
I have configured two WAN (WAN and WAN2) and setup a group in System=>Routing=>Group. I set "Tier 1" for the 2 Interface Dynamic Gateway WAN and WAN2, set "Trigger Level" to "Member Down" and saved the group. I have reported the group in my first rule in "Firewall"=>"Rules"=>"LAN", in "Gateway" item. But if I plug off WAN1, WAN2 is not used and traffic is stopped.
It does not work with snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010. But I must have wrong configuration. I have read that in 2.0, it is not mandatory to create 3 routing groups. Is the document http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing still accurate for version 2.0 ?
Another issue. When I click on Status=>RRD Graph, I have message:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '{' in /usr/local/www/status_rrd_graph.php on line 243Fixed in snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010
-
It does not work with snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010. But I must have wrong configuration. I have read that in 2.0, it is not mandatory to create 3 routing groups. Is the document http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing still accurate for version 2.0 ?
Found Howto http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,28121.0.html