Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    LoadBalancing and Traffic Shaper

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    14 Posts 7 Posters 8.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jonnyD
      last edited by

      No it doesnt work with disabled traffic shaping too :-( !
      I'm using the beta4 snapshot from 17.12.2010.

      As soon as i switch from default to the Main gateway group all internet connections stop working.
      Is there a bug in this snapshot version?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jonnyD
        last edited by

        I updated to snapshot-20.04.2010 but nothing changes…

        i get these information from system logs:
        kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.155.4
        kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.155.2

        These are the ip adresses from the gw_wan2 and gw_wan3 ...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          Nachtfalke
          last edited by

          These to Gateways are in the same subnet…not sure, if this works !?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jonnyD
            last edited by

            192.168.155.4 and 155.2 are two fritzbox routers for the A-DSL connections…
            Only Wan1 is in another subnet.

            Do i have to put the fritzbox routers in another subnet to get things work?
            Can't imagine that cause everything (except sticky connections and traffic shaping) worked fine under pfsense 1.2.3

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              rafael.cardoso
              last edited by

              I have the same errors in the log, but my connections are not on the same subnet, Traffic Shaping is not getting more packages from VOIP

              Respect is Everything!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • I
                iimre
                last edited by

                I've tried to set up traffic shaper with the wizard and got this message:
                "There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: should have one default queue on pppoe0pfctl: errors in altq config - The line in question reads [ should have one default queue on pppoe0 pfctl]: …"
                I am on 2.0-BETA4 (i386) built on Mon Dec 20 22:18:43 EST 2010 embedded (nanobsd) on Alix board.
                I've 1 WAN , 1 wired + 1 wlan  bridged (bridge0 as LAN). My aim with shaper is to provide everyone a fair bandwidth to wan and do not let anyone to seize the whole bandwidth.
                If the wizard doesn't create the default queue, how can I do it?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  ebo2002fr
                  last edited by

                  Hi

                  I have a similar issue with 2010-12-20 snapshot.

                  I have configured two WAN (WAN and WAN2) and setup a group in System=>Routing=>Group. I set "Tier 1" for the 2 Interface Dynamic Gateway WAN and WAN2, set "Trigger Level" to "Member Down" and saved the group. I have reported the group in my first rule in "Firewall"=>"Rules"=>"LAN", in  "Gateway" item. But if I plug off WAN1, WAN2 is not used and traffic is stopped.

                  Another issue. When I click on Status=>RRD Graph, I have message:
                  Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '{' in /usr/local/www/status_rrd_graph.php on line 243

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jguenther
                    last edited by

                    I am having the same issue, on the latest snapshot

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      eri--
                      last edited by

                      Try latest snapshots fixed.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • I
                        iimre
                        last edited by

                        @ermal:

                        Try latest snapshots fixed.

                        Seems to be O.K. now.
                        Thanks

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          ebo2002fr
                          last edited by

                          I have upgraded to snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010

                          @ebo2002fr:

                          I have configured two WAN (WAN and WAN2) and setup a group in System=>Routing=>Group. I set "Tier 1" for the 2 Interface Dynamic Gateway WAN and WAN2, set "Trigger Level" to "Member Down" and saved the group. I have reported the group in my first rule in "Firewall"=>"Rules"=>"LAN", in  "Gateway" item. But if I plug off WAN1, WAN2 is not used and traffic is stopped.

                          It does not work with snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010. But I must have wrong configuration. I have read that in 2.0, it is not mandatory to create 3 routing groups. Is the document http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing still accurate for version 2.0 ?

                          @ebo2002fr:

                          Another issue. When I click on Status=>RRD Graph, I have message:
                          Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '{' in /usr/local/www/status_rrd_graph.php on line 243

                          Fixed in snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E
                            ebo2002fr
                            last edited by

                            @ebo2002fr:

                            It does not work with snapshot built on Fri Dec 24 00:25:29 EST 2010. But I must have wrong configuration. I have read that in 2.0, it is not mandatory to create 3 routing groups. Is the document http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Multi_WAN_/_Load_Balancing still accurate for version 2.0 ?

                            Found Howto http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,28121.0.html

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.