Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Kernel Panic

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    325 Posts 35 Posters 249.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      LostInIgnorance
      last edited by

      My soekris hasn't crashed (great job fixing the panics! :D), but i haven't tested the dell em machine yet.  :-\

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        geewhz01
        last edited by

        Just crashed here, sorry.  Running 2.0-BETA5 (amd64)
        built on Sun Jan 30 23:04:29 EST 2011 .  Happened right after a rule change.

        pfsense131.png
        pfsense131.png_thumb

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eri--
          last edited by

          What did crash the primary or the secondary?
          It crashed on clicking apply rules or in the secondary after the sync?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            geewhz01
            last edited by

            @ermal:

            What did crash the primary or the secondary?
            It crashed on clicking apply rules or in the secondary after the sync?

            The secondary crashed after the sync.

            Thanks,

            Andy

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              eri--
              last edited by

              Can you please send me your config?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                vito
                last edited by

                ermal
                My system has been good so far.
                i just updated another firewall and will let you know.

                Thanks again for your help.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  geewhz01
                  last edited by

                  @ermal:

                  Can you please send me your config?

                  I have sent borh the primary and secondary.  Let me know if I can be of further assistance.

                  Thanks,

                  Andy

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    eri--
                    last edited by

                    I committed a fix for this issue too.
                    So grab a snapshot from late tomorrow and test.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      geewhz01
                      last edited by

                      Still a problem for me.  Secondary locked a few minutes after a rule change.  Running AMD64 20110201-1959.

                      Thanks,

                      Andy

                      pfsense2211.png
                      pfsense2211.png_thumb

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        eri--
                        last edited by

                        Confirmed fix since i found a way to reproduce it.
                        Snapshots of tomorrow should be ok.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jnorellJ
                          jnorell
                          last edited by

                          A quick note, I updated my carp slave to Feb 2 04:04:51 EST 2011 with some of the recent kernel panic fixes, but I'm still able to panic it by adding a new VIP addr.  (I deleted a VIP addr, no problem; then re-added that addr, no problem; then added a new VIP addr, and it panic'd in devd again.)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            fasteddy
                            last edited by

                            I looked through a similar topic (http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,31721.0.html) but wasn't entirely convinced I'm having the same issue, so a new topic seemed to be in order…

                            I have had an IPSec  site-to-site VPN connection running trouble-free for months now using two pfSense PCs running 2.0 BETA i386 snapshots from May of 2010.  After updating to a January 27th snapshot (and snapshots from every day since, including today) I'm having problems with one of the PCs locking up.  Without fail, if I attempt to log on to the web configuration page of the remote pfSense box through the VPN connection, it will serve up the 'login' page, but crashes as soon as I hit the 'login' button.  The error message on the pfSense box's monitor says:

                            
                            Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
                            cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
                            fault virtual address   = 0xd79a2720
                            fault code              = supervisor read, page not present
                            instruction pointer     = 0x20:0xd79a2720
                            stack pointer           = 0x28:0xc5b26bbc
                            frame pointer           = 0x28:0xc5b26bc8
                            code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
                                                    = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
                            processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
                            current process         = 0 (em3 taskq)
                            
                            

                            I've attached a picture of the backtrace information as well.

                            If I do a remote desktop connection to a PC on the remote side of the VPN, I can access the web configuration through that PC's browser with no issues.  The problem only occurs if I try to access the web configuration of the remote pfSense box (or ssh console, for that matter) directly from a machine on the local side of the VPN.  I've been doing this with no problems until I updated on the 27th.

                            For what it's worth, this only happens on one of my two machines - if I'm on the 'sick' pfSense box's network I can access the 'healthy' pfSense box's web configuration directly through the VPN with no issues.  The two PCs are substantially different, but are using the same network cards - Intel Pro/1000MT gigabit NICs.  The 'sick' pfSense box also has an on-board Marvell Yukon Gigabit interface (skc0).

                            The output of 'pciconf -lvp' is:

                            
                            skc0@pci0:0:10:0:       class=0x020000 card=0x811a1043 chip=0x432011ab rev=0x13 hdr=0x00
                                class      = network
                                subclass   = ethernet
                                bar   [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa000000, size 16384, enabled
                                bar   [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa000, size 256, enabled
                            em0@pci0:0:11:0:        class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                                class      = network
                                subclass   = ethernet
                                bar   [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa300000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [14] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa200000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa400, size 64, enabled
                            em1@pci0:0:12:0:        class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                                class      = network
                                subclass   = ethernet
                                bar   [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa600000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [14] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa500000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xa800, size 64, enabled
                            em2@pci0:0:13:0:        class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                                class      = network
                                subclass   = ethernet
                                bar   [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa900000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [14] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfa800000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb000, size 64, enabled
                            em3@pci0:0:14:0:        class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00
                                class      = network
                                subclass   = ethernet
                                bar   [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfac00000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [14] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfab00000, size 131072, enabled
                                bar   [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xb400, size 64, enabled
                            
                            

                            Any chance someone could shed some light on this issue?  I can reliably reproduce the issue if need be, and would be happy to provide any additional information that may be required.

                            Thank you, and best regards!

                            fasteddy_backtrace.jpg
                            fasteddy_backtrace.jpg_thumb

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jimpJ
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by

                              The snap from 2/3 would be the first to have the carp panic fixes.

                              There is still an issue (when deleting a VIP) but the panic you're seeing has likely been fixed in the most recent snap that is up now (Thu Feb 3 00:55:19 EST 2011)

                              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • F
                                FisherKing
                                last edited by

                                Hi Jimp - My read of the build logs suggested that Ermal's patch didn't get included in last nights build even though the build was started after the commit was made.

                                Thu Feb  3 04:21:58 EST 2011 -|- >>> Sleeping for 86400 in between snapshot builder runs.  Last known commit 847e5e8257b58906a0d12ce48275cae7162aab47

                                That commit listed there shows up in redmine as being a couple before ermals commit.  Am I reading that wrong?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jimpJ
                                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                  last edited by

                                  I started the builder by hand after his commit.
                                  The patches are committed in the tools repo - the tools repo isn't tracked by the builder in the function you pasted.

                                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • F
                                    FisherKing
                                    last edited by

                                    Hmmm - Just panicked, running 2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Thu Feb 3 00:55:19 EST 2011 on both master & slave.

                                    Updated a rule on the master, slave panicked.

                                    I've attached images of the panic & bt.

                                    ![](http://Carp panic.png)
                                    ![](http://Carp bt.png)

                                    ![Carp panic.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Carp panic.png)
                                    ![Carp panic.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Carp panic.png_thumb)
                                    ![Carp bt.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Carp bt.png)
                                    ![Carp bt.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Carp bt.png_thumb)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      eri--
                                      last edited by

                                      The issue is fixed. Just the patch i committed had some typo from copy/pasto.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • E
                                        eri--
                                        last edited by

                                        You should grab the next snapshot that will come out.
                                        AFAIK it has no more such issues.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jimpJ
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by

                                          I just started a new build after ermal's commit - the next new snapshot should include this fix.

                                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • F
                                            fasteddy
                                            last edited by

                                            Thanks Ermal!  I'll give the next snapshot a try when it is available and report back.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.