Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Soekris net6501

    Hardware
    11
    17
    15.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      GoldServe
      last edited by

      Anyone have anymore info on release date? I'm really looking forward to this!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by

        That sounds great but I would wait for PC-Engines to come out with something similar.

        Soekris has showed the pfSense project 0 attention and has done nothing to help the project.

        PC-Engines has done an amazing amount for the project and I would rather see them awarded with business over Soekris.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          GoldServe
          last edited by

          Do you know of some inside information from PC-engines that the general public does not know? I would have bought the soekris in a heartbeat but if there is something comparable from pc-engines, i would definitely put all my support behind them. Besides, they are cheaper anyways! :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G
            GoldServe
            last edited by

            I got an e-mail reply from pc-engines and it looks like they don't like the chipset for the ATOM processors so don't hold your breath for one!

            I'm sad to hear that!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              mrsteveman1
              last edited by

              I've talked to one of the PC-engines guys recently (pascal), they don't have any plans to go with the Via Nano either (chipset uses too much power). They also aren't planning to go to 512mb ram on the Alix2 boards either.

              I hope they do go with the Atom though, that would be a substantial upgrade over the current Geode setup they use.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                GoldServe
                last edited by

                I really hope so too. There isn't much to like about the chipsets for atom and the power it draws but then again, there isn't much else out there…

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  dra
                  last edited by

                  So, everybody heard the good news from Soren Kristensen? Prototypes should be ready in March: http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/2011-January/017014.html Although it will still take some time till they will be available I am really looking forward to this box!

                  Bye, Daniel

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    vorgusa
                    last edited by

                    Looks like they have finished it up.  They should be for sale shortly :)

                    "We are pleased to announce that the single unit board-only pricing for the net6501 series is as follows:

                    net6501-30 (600Mhz/512Mbyte version) $329

                    net6501-50 (1Ghz/1024Mbyte version) $379"

                    http://soekris.com/catalog/category/view/s/net6501/id/76/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jimpJ
                      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                      last edited by

                      And then you get to be his beta tester. :-)

                      Already slipped from March to "Late May"… still not holding my breath.

                      And at that price I'd be looking at boxes from Lanner or building my own 1U atom with more RAM.

                      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                      Do not Chat/PM for help!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • AhnHELA
                        AhnHEL
                        last edited by

                        @dafb:

                        Tue Dec 15 20:19:31 UTC 2009
                        _Maybe it's time to tell a little more…. The net6501 is moving forward
                        and I do expect to have hardware ready in Q1 2010, although I am known
                        to be an optimist :-)

                        Yes I believe the window where this would have been awesome has since past.  Setting up your own Atom board I think is more efficient and cost effective right now._

                        AhnHEL (Angel)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jasonlitka
                          last edited by

                          @jimp:

                          And then you get to be his beta tester. :-)

                          Already slipped from March to "Late May"… still not holding my breath.

                          And at that price I'd be looking at boxes from Lanner or building my own 1U atom with more RAM.

                          Lanner makes some great stuff and I'd absolutely buy from them if they made something comparable to the 6501, even at a higher price.  I was thinking of picking up their FW-7539 for home but I'm pretty sure the 82583V NICs won't work in pfSense, and I found out it's not fanless, even in single-core design, so until the situation changes, Soekris has a unique product and will probably get my business on a couple units if they ever ship.

                          I can break anything.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • V
                            vorgusa
                            last edited by

                            The main advantage is the 4 gigabit NICs.  Most boxes I have seen elsewhere have been more expensive or just have 1 NIC.  You will need more then that for a router.  I have a Lanner Box that has 2 NICs but it runs pretty hot and cost more.  Not sure we would need more then a 1Ghz CPU and 1 GB of RAM for a Pfsense box.  I like the thought of it being minimal with no Graphics

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • valnarV
                              valnar
                              last edited by

                              @vorgusa:

                              The main advantage is the 4 gigabit NICs.  Most boxes I have seen elsewhere have been more expensive or just have 1 NIC.  You will need more then that for a router.  I have a Lanner Box that has 2 NICs but it runs pretty hot and cost more.  Not sure we would need more then a 1Ghz CPU and 1 GB of RAM for a Pfsense box.  I like the thought of it being minimal with no Graphics

                              Agreed.  I would rather have this over a standard desktop Atom board…..for pfSense.

                              Can anyone in pfSense-land talk to PC Engines and see if they are coming out with an equivalent?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.