Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlocker

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    896 Posts 143 Posters 1.3m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • I
      ipv6kid
      last edited by

      You said to make sure I didn't have double "table-entries", what if I used the same list to deny inbound and outbound? Would that cause this error?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • marcellocM
        marcelloc
        last edited by

        If you need to inbound and outbound rules on same table, choose alias on list action and then create a manual rule in wan and other in lan.

        If you still want list1, you may need 1.000.000 or more.

        You can't see pfBlocker table because you got erros during apply.

        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

        Help a community developer! ;D

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • I
          ipv6kid
          last edited by

          Yeah I just noticed some of these lists run into the hundreds of thousands of tables. I am running an old clunky dell laptop from 2003-ish. With only 768 MB of RAM, and when I enabled more states into the 2 million range, RAM usage shot up and it started swapping.

          I'm also running SNORT on top of this, so I'm going to need a gateway with more RAM.

          It seems to be working without errors now, I've disabled and re-enabled PFblocker… after deleting all the large block lists.

          I can now see the pFblocker "tables" under Diagnostics > Tables.

          I also think some of these "debug" errors were due to logging being enabled, so if anybody else is still having issues, try disabling that. Where does this even log to anyways? I couldn't find where it was logging to in the console unless it was going directly to system logs.

          Thank you very much!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            tommyboy180
            last edited by

            FYI,

            I'm running Level1, Level2, and Level3 on a system with only 256MB RAM. You don't need more RAM, just increase your Firewall Maximum Table Entries.

            marcelloc,
            Level1, Level2, and Level3 lists do have 'good' guys in the list but it's an Anti-P2P list. All the IPs have been involved in anti-P2P behavior. That's why I always run Level1 lists at a min. It's actually one of the main reasons why I made IP-Blocklist.

            -Tom Schaefer
            SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

            Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • RonpfSR
              RonpfS
              last edited by

              I use dshield, drop, hijacked etc on Pfsense Box.

              I use the level 1, badpeers, etc on Seed Box with PeerBlock.

              2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
              Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
              Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcellocM
                marcelloc
                last edited by

                I know it's quite off topic but 'Companies which anti-p2p activity has been seen from' for me means:
                Companies that try to detect p2p users, so if you block it, they cant' find your p2p activity.

                Isn't better using this list to block torrent search like pirate bay?

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tommyboy180
                  last edited by

                  @marcelloc:

                  I know it's quite off topic but 'Companies which anti-p2p activity has been seen from' for me means:
                  Companies that try to detect p2p users, so if you block it, they cant' find your p2p activity.

                  Isn't better using this list to block torrent search like pirate bay?

                  We're talking about two different things here. This is a bit off topic so I won't go into much detail but basically…

                  • If you don't want to get sued for downloading copyrighted material then you block Anti-P2P groups using Level1 among using many other protection techniques

                  • If you want to prevent network users from using P2P then you implement Layer7 filtering

                  Blocking sites like TPB do nothing to prevent P2P traffic from using TPB's trackers. It's moot. That's why Level1 lists has all bad IPs.
                  I hope this clears it up.

                  -Tom Schaefer
                  SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                  Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    ipv6kid
                    last edited by

                    Is it possible to currently use host name block lists with PFblocker?

                    I'd like to include some known malware URL's. Can that be a feature in an upcoming version?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      tommyboy180
                      last edited by

                      @ipv6kid:

                      Is it possible to currently use host name block lists with PFblocker?

                      I'd like to include some known malware URL's. Can that be a feature in an upcoming version?

                      Host names resolve to IP addresses. You can create your own custom list to be used with pfblocker or try to find a list that meets your needs. There are literally hundreds of lists available for free so I would bet your list is already made for you. Start looking at iblocklist.com

                      -Tom Schaefer
                      SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                      Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sekular
                        last edited by

                        I have a problem where the inbound block rule does not get created for the included country lists. I have been installing and testing packages so i have installed havp and snort and uninstalled them and then reinstalled them again, due to trying to identify a problem. Outbound rules can still be created and the alias for both inbound and outbound are fine. But when i select inbound rule deny on the country lists pages it does not create the rule. Even if i stop pfblocker and remove all the lists and readd and then enable pfblocker, it creates the alias and the outbound block but not the rules on wan.

                        edit: Ok I added a random rule with port 123 on wan and then readded then the lists appeared in the rules and when i changed another country list to inbound deny it showed up. So maybe it is just my rules are not refreshing right and is not related to pfblocker.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • marcellocM
                          marcelloc
                          last edited by

                          You need at least one rule created to pfBlocker work on selected interface.

                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                          Help a community developer! ;D

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            mentalhemroids
                            last edited by

                            Running 2.0-RELEASE (i386) built on Tue Sep 13 17:00:00 EDT 2011 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz w/ 3gb RAM.

                            Just loaded and reloaded pfBlocker and I'm finding that if I set outbound to be blocked to spamlist I can still get to India or Russia located sites.  Any idea what I might need to do.  I have my firewall maximum table entries at 500000.

                            Thanks.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • T
                              tommyboy180
                              last edited by

                              @mentalhemroids:

                              Running 2.0-RELEASE (i386) built on Tue Sep 13 17:00:00 EDT 2011 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz w/ 3gb RAM.

                              Just loaded and reloaded pfBlocker and I'm finding that if I set outbound to be blocked to spamlist I can still get to India or Russia located sites.  Any idea what I might need to do.  I have my firewall maximum table entries at 500000.

                              Thanks.

                              What are the sites?

                              -Tom Schaefer
                              SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                              Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                mentalhemroids
                                last edited by

                                @tommyboy180

                                194.226.127.34 - http://eng.kremlin.ru
                                203.199.104.241 - http://www.airindia.in

                                and http://www.prodisney.ru/index.php?page=clones.php

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • marcellocM
                                  marcelloc
                                  last edited by

                                  @mentalhemroids:

                                  Running 2.0-RELEASE (i386) built on Tue Sep 13 17:00:00 EDT 2011 Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz w/ 3gb RAM.

                                  Just loaded and reloaded pfBlocker and I'm finding that if I set outbound to be blocked to spamlist I can still get to India or Russia located sites.  Any idea what I might need to do.  I have my firewall maximum table entries at 500000.

                                  Thanks.

                                  Are you blocking countries India and Russia or applying a spamlist from ipblocklist?

                                  Enable pfblocker widget. there you can see alias package count hit.

                                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                  Help a community developer! ;D

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M
                                    mentalhemroids
                                    last edited by

                                    @marcelloc

                                    I have the spamlist all selected; I was assuming that if the country is in there the entire country would be blocked.  Am I wrong?

                                    I will take a look at the widget today.

                                    Thanks!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • marcellocM
                                      marcelloc
                                      last edited by

                                      The default way to block spam is inbound as you do not want them to send email to you.

                                      You can also change action to alias only and create a block rule only on inbound smtp connections.

                                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                      Help a community developer! ;D

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        sekular
                                        last edited by

                                        If i enable the top spammers alias included in pfblocker on outbound those hostnames you specified are not accessible.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • marcellocM
                                          marcelloc
                                          last edited by

                                          @sekular:

                                          If i enable the top spammers alias included in pfblocker on outbound those hostnames you specified are not accessible.

                                          Top spammers is just a shortcut for countries that send many spams.

                                          The best way to block this is changing action to alias only and create an inbound rule denying smtp connections.

                                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                          Help a community developer! ;D

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            mentalhemroids
                                            last edited by

                                            I chose alias only and set outbound and inbound block; I'm still getting to the sites.  The one interesting thing is that before I chose the option block outbound this morning I had it set to block inbound yesterday before I went home and when I loaded the widget this morning it had some packets listed.  It doesn't have anything listed right now… I may need to reboot the server; I'll try that later on today.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.