• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Sangoma A101 T1 cards / Soekris

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
8 Posts 2 Posters 3.3k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    cubsfan
    last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 4:51 PM

    Does pfSense support the Sangoma (or any other) T1 WAN interface card?  Has anyone successfully used pfSense on Soekris hardware?  I've currently got a T1 and want to build a router to backup or replace my existing Cisco since they won't renew my support contract and I also want to add a cable connection to the office for a backup/load balance connection.

    thanks

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      sullrich
      last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 4:52 PM

      No, it currently does not support it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cubsfan
        last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 5:25 PM

        Are there any plans to add support for T1 interfaces?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sullrich
          last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 6:14 PM

          @cubsfan:

          Are there any plans to add support for T1 interfaces?

          No. Too many devices, too little time, not enough developers interested.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cubsfan
            last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 6:46 PM

            Gotcha.  Well let me ask if this is possible.  I've got a dual lan router in place right now with a DMZ setup on one of the interfaces and my private LAN on the other.

            RTR
                    / 
                  /   
                DMZ  LAN (nat)

            Can I setup pf such that I can move my DMZ behind pf so I can take advantage of the load balancing and failover features in pf?

            RTR
                        |
                      PF
                      / 
                      /   
                    DMZ  LAN (nat)

            Some type of unnumbered setup?  The DMZ interface would esentially have to be on the same subnet as the router/pf subnet.  Wouldn't give me any backup if my router died but I have an extra router with a single interface I could use for that if I could get everything behind pf.  Suppose I could setup a dummy subnet for the DMZ and use NAT but I would like to avoid having to redo my DMZ if possible and I have a VPN server on the DMZ currently and don't want to hassle with any potential NAT issues.

            thanks for all of your help

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sullrich
              last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 8:29 PM

              Yes, should work ok.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cubsfan
                last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 9:15 PM

                Which one?  Can I do the unnumbered trick or do I have to use static NATs to setup a DMZ network?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sullrich
                  last edited by Jan 24, 2007, 9:20 PM

                  Either.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  1 out of 8
                  • First post
                    1/8
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                    This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                    consent.not_received