Problem with two lan networks and access to ap
-
from pfsense to AP - There is Ping
That would go out from 192.168.2.1 on pfSense directly to the AP. So pfSense OPT1 and the AP have compatible (hopefully the same) subnets.
from AP to pfsense - no ping
I guess that was from AP, ping 192.168.1.1 - the pfSense LAN IP. In that case the AP probably does not know how to route to that. If you tried to ping 192.168.2.1 then that is good, but you will need to have added a pass rule on OPT1 after booting the LiveCD version.
I can't understand what has happened here - the symptoms look a lot like an AP subnet/mask/default gateway problem. But it is pfSense that has been upgraded - so what is the real cause of the problem???
Can you post the actual AP:
- IP address
- network mask
- default gateway for LAN (or tell us that there is no setting for that)
and confirm that OPT1 is 192.168.2.1/24 and has a pass rule with source any (or OPT1 net).
-
Few answers
Interfaces configured so
Wired network 192.168.0.1/24 –----> go to Switch dhcp on pfsense 192.168.0.30 -- 100
Wireless Network 192.168.2.1/24 ------> go to AP dhcp on pfsense 192.168.2.30 -- 100
AP Fixed address 192.168.2.101
ping from pfsense 192.168.0.1 to AP 192.168.2.1 There is Ping
ping from AP 192.168.2.1 to pfsense 192.168.0.1 no ping
OPT1 = WIFI = 192.168.2.1/24
Here are screen shots of the management interface of the AP
-
MORE
-
Afraid your WAN should be set to Disabled, not Dynamic IP Address.
-
Totally not a pfsense problem. Did you get it working yet?
-
I can't see where it lets you specify
- the LAN netmask (/24 or 255.255.255.0)
- a LAN gateway
Probably (1) is on a screen somewhere - maybe I missed it.
I suspect it won't have a place to enter (2), because it thinks it is already a router (gateway). -
Totally not a pfsense problem. Did you get it working yet?
not yet
Afraid your WAN should be set to Disabled, not Dynamic IP Address.
Selecting other options
And there is no communicationI can't see where it lets you specify
- the LAN netmask (/24 or 255.255.255.0)
- a LAN gateway
Probably (1) is on a screen somewhere - maybe I missed it.
I suspect it won't have a place to enter (2), because it thinks it is already a router (gateway).As soon as I turn off the dhcp
And gave him a fixed network address
the LAN netmask
and LAN gateway
are from the pfsenseI will try to run pfsense live cd 2.0.3
-
-
Selecting other options
And there is no communicationHuh, whut?
If I choose another option
I will not have internet accessAs soon as I turn off the dhcp
And gave him a fixed network address
the LAN netmask
and LAN gateway
are from the pfsenseEh? There is no netmask and gateway visible anywhere…
there is on pfsense
-
ping from pfsense 192.168.0.1 to AP 192.168.2.1 There is Ping
ping from AP 192.168.2.1 to pfsense 192.168.0.1 no ping
I assume this must be a typo and the ping was to the AP at 192.168.2.101?
You need to try pinging from the AP to the pfSense OPT1 address, 192.168.2.1. That should work fine.
from pfsense to wireless client - no ping
That's odd. The problems with the AP should not cause this. Presumably AP to wireless client is OK?
Steve
-
Reading the manual for that router (wbr-3406tx) it appears there's no way to set a subnet mask or gateway for the LAN interface but it's not a problem because you can add a route manually. Adding a route is the correct way to do this, fudging the subnet is a workaround.
In Advanced Setting: Routing: add this:
Destination: 192.168.0.1
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.2.1
Hop: 1Enable that and hit save. Your AP will now have a route back to the pfSense LAN subnet.
Steve
-
If I choose another option
I will not have internet accessThe only correct option is Disable/None/whatever matching this… Not any random other option.
there is on pfsense
That is NOT what we are talking about at all. We are talking about netmask/GW on the AP. And on that note, there should be no gateway set for LAN interfaces on pfSense!
Reading the manual for that router (wbr-3406tx) it appears there's no way to set a subnet mask or gateway for the LAN interface but it's not a problem because you can add a route manually
Apparently this piece of garbage HW would best be utilized in a dumpster.
-
I'm withholding judgement on the usefullness of this device as an AP until stephenw10 suggestion is tried.
Even if the router/AP doesn't end up being as slick as some other APs, I do see some usefullnes in it.
It is currently isolated from the LAN, so for sharing internet to visitors, it might be cool and secure (-: -
ping from pfsense 192.168.0.1 to AP 192.168.2.1 There is Ping
ping from AP 192.168.2.1 to pfsense 192.168.0.1 no ping
I assume this must be a typo and the ping was to the AP at 192.168.2.101?
You need to try pinging from the AP to the pfSense OPT1 address, 192.168.2.1. That should work fine.
from pfsense to wireless client - no ping
That's odd. The problems with the AP should not cause this. Presumably AP to wireless client is OK?
Steve
it is a typo my bad
i try ping from 192.168.2.101 to 192.168.2.1 and there is a ping
Reading the manual for that router (wbr-3406tx) it appears there's no way to set a subnet mask or gateway for the LAN interface but it's not a problem because you can add a route manually. Adding a route is the correct way to do this, fudging the subnet is a workaround.
In Advanced Setting: Routing: add this:
Destination: 192.168.0.1
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.2.1
Hop: 1Enable that and hit save. Your AP will now have a route back to the pfSense LAN subnet.
Steve
I tried to change and nothing worked
I had to do hard Reset
And configure it as beforeIf I choose another option
I will not have internet accessThe only correct option is Disable/None/whatever matching this… Not any random other option.
there is on pfsense
That is NOT what we are talking about at all. We are talking about netmask/GW on the AP. And on that note, there should be no gateway set for LAN interfaces on pfSense!
Reading the manual for that router (wbr-3406tx) it appears there's no way to set a subnet mask or gateway for the LAN interface but it's not a problem because you can add a route manually
Apparently this piece of garbage HW would best be utilized in a dumpster.
There is no option disable
-
Getting a E1000 linksys is crazy cheap on ebay.
When loaded with DD-WRT they will do every thing you want and more, just incase this doesn't pan out for you.
-
Getting a E1000 linksys is crazy cheap on ebay.
When loaded with DD-WRT they will do every thing you want and more, just incase this doesn't pan out for you.
My cousin did not need it
So brought it to meIf I had to buy
Would you buy something much betterOn that note
I'm dead tired
I will continue with this tomorrow -
"If I had to buy
Would you buy something much better"For your purposes, its hard to do much better - Easy to spend much more money though.
If I wanted wireless N vs G, I'd go with the E2000 - Also dirt cheap used.A new solution will probably not bring you any more practical utility and will cost you.
-
Hmm, this is interesting but confusing.
It is possible that it's only possible to add static routes on the WAN interface, there is no option to select the interface. However if that were the case then adding that route should have had no effect at all. I assume by your statement "nothing worked" that you were then unable to connect to the webgui at all? Seems like your router may be misbehaving somehow.
Anyway you have yet more options! Another way to allow the access point to have a route back to LAN is to NAT between them. Now usually you wouldn't want that but it could be done with manual NAT configuation.
The other thing you could do, and this is what I've done, is just not worry about it! ;) I have an access point that (mis)behaves in exactly this way. It has no route back to other interfaces, I cannot add a route to it, I cannot configure a gateway on it's LAN, I can enter a fudged subnet mask but that doesn't work. So I set it up and ignore it. I probably haven't needed to check its webgui for a year or so and when I do I just connect by wifi.
Steve
-
Personally, I think he should have all his connections on the LAN ports on that AP and that he should put tape over his WAN port.
-
Good Morning
I did a Hard Reset to AP
And put everything to the initial state as if he were RouterThen again I followed the guide to make it to AP
And it works as AP
Just the access its management interface is only when connecting Directly to him
wired or wirelessI do not know what to say
I tried everything I know
And all you knowJust does not work
I will stay with it how it is now
There is internet access from wireless devicesBut not sharing files between computers on the wired network
To computers on the wireless network
Or reversedIt would make me crazy in the near future
So many thanks to everyone for the helpIf I find why this happens I promise to update
