Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Pfblocker 2.1 error (Cannot allocate memory) with builds after "Aug 1 19:39:40"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    21 Posts 10 Posters 10.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      DigitalDeviant
      last edited by

      @jimp:

      Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
      https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

      Does the machine need a reboot after applying the patch? I applied it but can't reboot right now and am still getting the error.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        Can you show the contents of that file?
        Or does even that file exists at all?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          drzoidberg33
          last edited by

          @jimp:

          Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
          https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

          Thanks! Works :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pppfsense
            last edited by

            This worked for me too. Thanks!

            (Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

            @drzoidberg33:

            @jimp:

            Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
            https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

            Thanks! Works :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              pppfsense
              last edited by

              Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

              My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

              Thx.

              @pppfsense:

              This worked for me too. Thanks!

              (Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

              @drzoidberg33:

              @jimp:

              Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
              https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

              Thanks! Works :)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pppfsense
                last edited by

                This issue was indeed fixed in yesterday's build.

                Thanks so much to the pfSense team.

                pfSense rocks!

                @pppfsense:

                Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

                My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

                Thx.

                @pppfsense:

                This worked for me too. Thanks!

                (Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

                @drzoidberg33:

                @jimp:

                Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
                https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

                Thanks! Works :)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  brasilnut
                  last edited by

                  I am confused.

                  If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
                  2.1-RELEASE (i386)
                  built on Wed Sep 11 18:16:50 EDT 2013 ?

                  "[ There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:34: cannot define table pfBlockerEurope: Cannot allocate memory - The line in question reads [34]: table persist file /var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerEurope.txt]"

                  @pppfsense:

                  This issue was indeed fixed in yesterday's build.

                  Thanks so much to the pfSense team.

                  pfSense rocks!

                  @pppfsense:

                  Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

                  My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

                  Thx.

                  @pppfsense:

                  This worked for me too. Thanks!

                  (Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

                  @drzoidberg33:

                  @jimp:

                  Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
                  https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

                  Thanks! Works :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    brasilnut
                    last edited by

                    Also, if I try to Patch using "System: Patches"
                    I get the following errors:
                    "Patch can NOT be applied cleanly (detail)
                    Patch can NOT be reverted cleanly (detail)"

                    @brasilnut:

                    I am confused.

                    If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
                    2.1-RELEASE (i386)
                    built on Wed Sep 11 18:16:50 EDT 2013 ?

                    "[ There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:34: cannot define table pfBlockerEurope: Cannot allocate memory - The line in question reads [34]: table persist file /var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerEurope.txt]"

                    @pppfsense:

                    This issue was indeed fixed in yesterday's build.

                    Thanks so much to the pfSense team.

                    pfSense rocks!

                    @pppfsense:

                    Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

                    My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

                    Thx.

                    @pppfsense:

                    This worked for me too. Thanks!

                    (Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

                    @drzoidberg33:

                    @jimp:

                    Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
                    https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

                    Thanks! Works :)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • marcellocM
                      marcelloc
                      last edited by

                      @brasilnut:

                      I am confused.

                      If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
                      2.1-RELEASE (i386)

                      Disable pfblocker, increase the value and then enable it again.

                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                      Help a community developer! ;D

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        brasilnut
                        last edited by

                        Marcel,

                        Can you describe the value that you mentioned in your post?
                        Thanks !

                        @marcelloc:

                        @brasilnut:

                        I am confused.

                        If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
                        2.1-RELEASE (i386)

                        Disable pfblocker, increase the value and then enable it again.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • marcellocM
                          marcelloc
                          last edited by

                          It will depend on the size of your lists

                          you can use default 100000 or 300000 or 400000…..

                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                          Help a community developer! ;D

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            brasilnut
                            last edited by

                            @marcelloc:

                            It will depend on the size of your lists

                            you can use default 100000 or 300000 or 400000…..

                            Okay - Let me rephrase my question:

                            Where is this value?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • marcellocM
                              marcelloc
                              last edited by

                              @brasilnut:

                              Okay - Let me rephrase my question:

                              Where is this value?

                              It's on the first post of this thread System -> Advanced -> Firewall Maximum Table Entries

                              @pppfsense:

                              I already tried some very high values for the Firewall Maximum Table Entries  with no success (System - Advanced - Firewall Maximum Table Entries = 999999999)

                              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                              Help a community developer! ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.