Pfblocker 2.1 error (Cannot allocate memory) with builds after "Aug 1 19:39:40"

pppfsense

This worked for me too. Thanks!

(Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

@jimp:

Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

Thanks! Works :)

pppfsense

Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

Thx.

@pppfsense:

This worked for me too. Thanks!

(Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

@drzoidberg33:

@jimp:

Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

Thanks! Works :)

pppfsense

This issue was indeed fixed in yesterday's build.

Thanks so much to the pfSense team.

pfSense rocks!

@pppfsense:

Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

Thx.

@pppfsense:

This worked for me too. Thanks!

(Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

@drzoidberg33:

@jimp:

Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

Thanks! Works :)

brasilnut

I am confused.

If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
2.1-RELEASE (i386)
built on Wed Sep 11 18:16:50 EDT 2013 ?

"[ There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:34: cannot define table pfBlockerEurope: Cannot allocate memory - The line in question reads [34]: table persist file /var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerEurope.txt]"

@pppfsense:

This issue was indeed fixed in yesterday's build.

Thanks so much to the pfSense team.

pfSense rocks!

@pppfsense:

Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

Thx.

@pppfsense:

This worked for me too. Thanks!

(Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

@drzoidberg33:

@jimp:

Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

Thanks! Works :)

brasilnut

Also, if I try to Patch using "System: Patches"
I get the following errors:
"Patch can NOT be applied cleanly (detail)
Patch can NOT be reverted cleanly (detail)"

@brasilnut:

I am confused.

If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
2.1-RELEASE (i386)
built on Wed Sep 11 18:16:50 EDT 2013 ?

"[ There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:34: cannot define table pfBlockerEurope: Cannot allocate memory - The line in question reads [34]: table persist file /var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerEurope.txt]"

@pppfsense:

This issue was indeed fixed in yesterday's build.

Thanks so much to the pfSense team.

pfSense rocks!

@pppfsense:

Today's build (Thu Aug 15 16:30:12 EDT 2013 ) seems to fix this.

My bug is still open so this is not "official" yet. I'll confirm when it gets acknowledged and marked as fixed/closed.

Thx.

@pppfsense:

This worked for me too. Thanks!

(Guessing this will be fixed in an upcoming build?)

@drzoidberg33:

@jimp:

Try reverting this commit via the system patches package:
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/71549fa70975d30cf2fdb0275da8744b40c8ee49

Thanks! Works :)

marcelloc

@brasilnut:

I am confused.

If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
2.1-RELEASE (i386)

Disable pfblocker, increase the value and then enable it again.

brasilnut

Marcel,

Can you describe the value that you mentioned in your post?
Thanks !

@marcelloc:

@brasilnut:

I am confused.

If this was already fixed, why does it still happen in this build:
2.1-RELEASE (i386)

Disable pfblocker, increase the value and then enable it again.

marcelloc

It will depend on the size of your lists

you can use default 100000 or 300000 or 400000…..

brasilnut

@marcelloc:

It will depend on the size of your lists

you can use default 100000 or 300000 or 400000…..

Okay - Let me rephrase my question:

Where is this value?

marcelloc

@brasilnut:

Okay - Let me rephrase my question:

Where is this value?

It's on the first post of this thread System -> Advanced -> Firewall Maximum Table Entries

@pppfsense:

I already tried some very high values for the Firewall Maximum Table Entries with no success (System - Advanced - Firewall Maximum Table Entries = 999999999)