Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NAT Through Multi-WAN on pfSense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    13 Posts 2 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      drmwndr
      last edited by

      Sorry, i didn't knew that the model of DVR was so important, i thought that only the ports i want forward was enough.
      The DVR model is Giga Security GS 16480E.

      .90 is the IP of DVR.

      Again, sorry for the missed information.

      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        @drmwndr:

        .90 is the IP of DVR.

        You just invented that 155.102.xxx.90 IP, or??? Once again, this is not what you normally use on LANs (see RFC1918). You will never reach your DVR from outside unless you are

        
        NetRange:       155.102.0.0 - 155.102.255.255
        CIDR:           155.102.0.0/16
        OriginAS:       
        NetName:        ERIM
        NetHandle:      NET-155-102-0-0-1
        Parent:         NET-155-0-0-0-0
        NetType:        Direct Assignment
        RegDate:        1991-11-01
        Updated:        2012-03-02
        Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-155-102-0-0-1
        
        OrgName:        Altarum Institute
        OrgId:          ALTARU-1
        Address:        3520 Green Court
        City:           Ann Arbor
        StateProv:      MI
        PostalCode:     48105
        Country:        US
        RegDate:        2002-08-22
        Updated:        2008-08-28
        Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/ALTARU-1
        
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          drmwndr
          last edited by

          No, i didn't, i know the RFC1918 and the rules.
          I got this network completly crappy from an ex-employee, and i'm trying to fix stuffs here.  ;)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            doktornotor Banned
            last edited by

            Are you really sure about the ports? Because, that's not what I can see in the manual - page 29 (despite my non-existent Portuguese). Also, this config screen from the DVR would help. Other than that, no chance to check with 2.0.3, way too outdated, no such box here.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              drmwndr
              last edited by

              yes, i do.
              I saw the manual too, it says that comes with another ports by default, but checking the DVR Config, i saw this three ports setted. I'll try to change it.

              About the IP Range, was a known issue, i'll see what i can do to fix this in a short time! ;)

              Thanks for you attention!  ;D

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                doktornotor Banned
                last edited by

                @drmwndr:

                I saw the manual too, it says that comes with another ports by default, but checking the DVR Config, i saw this three ports setted. I'll try to change it.

                Well it should not matter as long as those are really the ports configured there and as long as you can see them open when checking from outside, like with http://www.canyouseeme.org/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  drmwndr
                  last edited by

                  Could be an ADSL router related issue?

                  Would be a good idea put it on a "bridge"  mode?
                  Because sometimes looks like pfSense doesnt receive the packages to delivery to DVR. I runned a tcpdump, and i couldnt identify traffic coming from outside to any desired ports.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    Yes, it would be definitely a good idea to put that in bridge mode and configure PPPoE in pfSense – since otherwise the pfSense configuration is pretty much irrelevant, the packets will never arrive there.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      drmwndr
                      last edited by

                      Ok! I'll try this in the end of this Business Day, and feedback here as soon i have results!  :D

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        drmwndr
                        last edited by

                        Solved using "Bridge" mode, thank you!  ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          doktornotor Banned
                          last edited by

                          Good. ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.