Need recommendation for pfsense computer hardware
-
I assume you mean 1Gbps WAN connection total?
If you want Snort, Squid and HAVP at 1Gpbs go are going to need some powerful hardware.
Get Intel NICs if you have a choice.
Steve
-
I assume you mean 1Gbps WAN connection total?
yes
If you want Snort, Squid and HAVP at 1Gpbs go are going to need some powerful hardware.
How strong
I currently have these packages installed on an old computer with 756 MB memoryand it works
What are the differences between the various cards
Why Intel's cards are more expensive
What they have that others do notI saw all kinds Intel cards
Which one
What is the difference between the various cards from Intel -
Intel EXPI9301CT
Intel PWLA8391GTBLK
Intel PRO/1000 PF
Intel EXPI9400PTBLK
Intel Pro/1000 GT
INTEL PRO/1000 CTthis is a few of what i saw
What is the difference between the cardsall difrent price
what i need to look for ?
why intel and not
d link
level one
tp link
TRENDnet
hp
edimaxWhat wireless network card
Most suitable
And has drivers in pfsenseI want a wireless card not for a AP
I want to make it as wan connection
When Internet connection falls
Access will be via the mobile phone network
{Wireless card Accesst the phone's AP} -
Intel cards have the best support in pfsense.
They're also the best cards all around.
Just get the least expensive out of all the intel options.
pfsense has terrible support for wireless cards and at the moment only supports wireless G i believe.
You will want to check the pfsense hardware support lists over carefully before you buy a wireless card, just a small revision in the model can make it so pfsense doesn't support it at all.
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Supported_Wireless_Cards - hardware supported lists.
-
If you want Snort, Squid and HAVP at 1Gpbs go are going to need some powerful hardware.
How strong
I currently have these packages installed on an old computer with 756 MB memoryand it works
No offence, but I find that difficult to believe. Snort eats an enormous amount of RAM if you want it to perform well, I use ~3GB per interface as a general rule for hardware planning, and it's also very CPU intensive. If you've got snort, squid, and havp all on the same box then you've either not got them actually doing anything (installed doesn't mean working), are running WAY less than 1Gbit/s, or are using much faster hardware than you're implying.
-
Currently my Internet connection is 10 MB
I'm upgrading the hardware
Because I am going to increase the connection to 150 MB or 200
Perhaps more if I need -
[pedantry]
A quick point of information. 10MB, Mega Bytes is 80Mb Mega bits.
Also Mb is quantity, Mbps is a rate.
Might not seem important but it can cause all sorts of confusion.
[/pedantry]The important part of a NIC is not who made the card but what chipset it uses. Those manufacturers you listed make many cards with many different chipsets from other manufacturers. Some are good many are bad. Generally speaking the prefered chipsets for use in pfSense (in order of preference) are :
Intel
Broadcom
Everyone else (Marvell, Atheros, Nvidia etc)
Realtek
That's somewhat of a simplification. Check the forum for actual reports. Almost all Intel cards work well. They generally give slightly higher throughput with less CPU loading. About the only exception to that is the Pro/1000 VT about which Jason said recently:
@Jason:then light the card on fire and buy a i350. The fewer VT cards that remain in this world the better.
:P
What CPU were you running in the 756MB box?
Steve
-
The important part of a NIC is not who made the card but what chipset it uses. Those manufacturers you listed make many cards with many different chipsets from other manufacturers
The bottom line
To buy Intel network card
Does not matter which
As long as it 10/100/1000
and it is not VTWhich of the cards I wrote earlier is VT ?
Intel EXPI9301CT
Intel PWLA8391GTBLK
Intel PRO/1000 PF
Intel EXPI9400PTBLK
Intel Pro/1000 GT
INTEL PRO/1000 CTWhat CPU were you running in the 756MB box?
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
A quick point of information. 10MB, Mega Bytes is 80Mb Mega bits.
Also Mb is quantity, Mbps is a rate.
Might not seem important but it can cause all sorts of confusion.I know
always get confused between them
the rate is 10 Mbps -
Which of the cards I wrote earlier is VT ?
Intel EXPI9301CT
Intel PWLA8391GTBLK
Intel PRO/1000 PF
Intel EXPI9400PTBLK
Intel Pro/1000 GT
INTEL PRO/1000 CTThankfully, none of them.
Those are:
82574L - Relatively-new Workstation/Entry Server
82541PI - Desktop adapter (PCI, and really old)
82572 - Older Server (useless unless you've got a multi-mode fiber connection with LC connectors)
82572 - Older Server (same as above except twisted pair)
82541PI - Same card as the first one of these, just the retail name instead of the bulk part number
82574L - Same card as the first one of these, just the retail name instead of the bulk part number.If these are your choices, the cards based on the 82574L are way out in front.
What CPU were you running in the 756MB box?
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
Ok, that would have no problems with the packages you mentioned at 10Mbit/s.
-
I saw the list of supported wireless cards in pfsense
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AojFUXcbH0ROdHgwYkFHbkRUdV9hVWljVWl5SXkxbFE&hl=en#gid=0
By accident
I have a card with a chip from the second row
That supports AllThis card is a 5 years old maybe more
If I want to buy a new
Today everything is standard on N or AC
is there any supported cards?Is it possible to know with which chip the network card is manufactured
On the packaging of the product
Or just check online ? -
There is currently (2.1.3) no support for 802.11N at all. Some 'N' cards are supported but only in 'G' mode. This is mostly because of the lack of support in FreeBSD 8.3 on which pfSense is built. pfSense 2.2 will have much better support because it's built on FreebSD 10. Still no 'AC' support though.
Exactly which card do you have? Since you've already got it you may as well try it.
A good place to look up wireless hardware is: https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Main_PageMost people will recommend you use an external access point for wifi. They can be bought very cheaply these days and will give you better features and usually better coverage.
Steve
-
Most people will recommend you use an external access point for wifi
I do not need the wireless card for wifi
I already have AP connected to pfsenseI want the card to be kind of a backup internet connection
Internet connection occasionally falls because a power outage or infrastructure work
Cellular Internet connection is still active
I want to turn the AP option in the cell phone
Then connect to it with a wireless cardI do that in several cases
But without successhttps://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,67694.msg387570.html#msg387570
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=75362.0
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,71096.0.htmlExactly which card do you have
Tp link card TL-WN650G
-
That card is an older chipset it should work well. I have a very similar card my home box.
Steve
-
How much memory should be put on the computer ?
Which processor
amd can be good or just Intel
Thanks for the help
-
How much memory should be put on the computer ?
Which processor
amd can be good or just Intel
Thanks for the help
Snort+Squid means "as much RAM as possible. To be honest though, using squid will likely slow you down. Squid is useful when you've got a bunch of users on a slow connection. You don't have a slow connection.
With a 1Gbit/s connection you will want a CPU with the fastest clock speed you can find. An Intel i3-3240 is a good option, though an i5 would be a better one since those add AES-NI (not terribly useful now, will be under pfSense 2.2) and ship with 4 cores instead of 2 (useful with snort on multiple interfaces, squid, and multi-threaded pf in pfsense 2.2).
