Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unstable internet since 2.2.4

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    31 Posts 7 Posters 4.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X Offline
      xman111
      last edited by

      I think apinger was taking down my VPN as well when it thought something was going wrong.

      So I should disable apinger, clear all logs and see what errors gets logged?  or just disable and do some pinging and other types of testing?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        Well, clearing the above noise from logs certainly won't harm anything.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F Offline
          firewalluser
          last edited by

          Might also be useful.
          https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3969

          Perhaps a useful test can be got from here.
          http://kb.paessler.com/en/topic/17133-what-does-could-not-bind-socket-address-and-port-are-already-in-use-mean

          Capitalism, currently The World's best Entertainment Control System and YOU cant buy it! But you can buy this, or some of this or some of these

          Asch Conformity, mainly the blind leading the blind.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • X Offline
            xman111
            last edited by

            thanks for the links!

            really looking forward to testing tonight, I am off tomorrow so I have tonight to play.

            Do you guys think i should completely change hardware or work with the system/software i have right now?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              doktornotor Banned
              last edited by

              I don't think changing HW will get you anywhere, frankly.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • X Offline
                xman111
                last edited by

                thanks,  you saved me a bunch of time and potentially money.  I will try to iron out issues with what I have.  will post back,  thanks for taking your time to help me.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • X Offline
                  xman111
                  last edited by

                  after I disable the gateway monitoring, what would be the best way to determine if i have a problem at all?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H Offline
                    heper
                    last edited by

                    you could run a batch file on one of your clients and let it run for a while.

                    something like this:

                    
                    @echo off
                    
                    :START
                    
                    ping -n 4 4.2.2.2 >nul
                    
                    if %errorlevel% == 1 (
                      echo Internet offline >> C:\Internet.txt
                      Time /t >> C:\Internet.txt
                    )
                    
                    Timeout /t 30
                    @set errorlevel = 0
                    
                    GOTO START
                    
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • X Offline
                      xman111
                      last edited by

                      awesome thanks Heper.. at least that gives me a start..  I was starting to think it might be an Intel network card that I have, probably isn't..

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • X Offline
                        xman111
                        last edited by

                        hey guys, stopping apinger seems to have helped with the errors and internet dropping, thanks for that.

                        I am now having problems with very high pings and slow internet.  sometimes the ping to 8.8.8.8 is 20ms, sometimes it is 800ms.  whenever I ping AirVPN, it is a 2-400ms.    I have been using DNS from UNblock, where is the setting to get the DNS from my ISP automatically?  i couldn't find them under WAN settings.

                        Any other hints to figure out what is going on with ping swings and generally high pings?  I cannot even use VPN it is so slow now, never had a problem before.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N Offline
                          NOYB
                          last edited by

                          Is DNS Forwarder or DNS Resolver enabled (which one)?

                          DNS Forwarder uses the DNS Servers specified in the System: General Setup.
                          DNS Resolver uses the DNS root servers.

                          Client DNS server assignment can be overridden in Services: DHCP server.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • X Offline
                            xman111
                            last edited by

                            i have DNS forwarder enabled and just LAN and Localhost selected as this is how my VPN is supposed to be setup when i get it working.

                            I plugged my cable modem directly into my laptop and everything is fast.  I then rebooted and connected PFsense again and it seems better.  I think i am starting to get how DNS is assigned, thanks NOYB.  Does DNS determine my Pings?

                            I can switch between my ISP dns and Unblock's dns and they both seem fairly fast pinging most websites.  When i ping some of the AIRVPN servers though, I am still getting the high hundreds though, not sure what that is about.  If I can't get good pings to them, i won't be able to get the VPN up and working.

                            Any way to figure out where it is going off the rail?

                            I was able to go to pingtest.net and get an A grade on my connection.  The only problem now i guess are the very high pings to the servers at AirVPN.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N Offline
                              NOYB
                              last edited by

                              DNS should have nothing to do with ping times (assuming name resolves to same IP address).  Once name is resolved to an IP address DNS is out of the picture.

                              To see where the slowness may be try a trace route (tracert on a Windows client).

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • X Offline
                                xman111
                                last edited by

                                does this mean anything?  the request timed out on step 2.  it seemed fast until step 7.

                                1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  pfSense.localdomain [192.168.1.1]
                                  2    *        *        *    Request timed out.
                                  3    9 ms    9 ms    9 ms  rd3st-tge0-13-0-10-1.vc.shawcable.net [64.59.150.85]
                                  4    16 ms    10 ms    14 ms  66.163.72.254
                                  5    14 ms    15 ms    16 ms  rc5wt-be5.wa.shawcable.net [66.163.74.158]
                                  6    15 ms    15 ms    13 ms  xe-9-1-0.sea22.ip4.gtt.net [77.67.71.73]
                                  7  160 ms  161 ms  161 ms  xe-1-3-0.fra29.ip4.gtt.net [141.136.108.17]
                                  8  167 ms  170 ms  168 ms  a100-gw.ip4.gtt.net [77.67.66.206]
                                  9  168 ms  171 ms  168 ms  54.239.5.110
                                10  167 ms  169 ms  167 ms  54.239.5.134
                                11  168 ms  173 ms  172 ms  ec2-54-93-175-114.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com [54.93.175.114]

                                and one to google

                                Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
                                over a maximum of 30 hops:

                                1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  pfSense.localdomain [192.168.1.1]
                                  2    *        *        *    Request timed out.
                                  3    12 ms    9 ms    10 ms  rd3st-tge0-13-0-10-1.vc.shawcable.net [64.59.150.85]
                                  4    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms  66.163.70.106
                                  5    18 ms    15 ms    16 ms  rx0wt-google.wa.shawcable.net [66.163.68.50]
                                  6    14 ms    15 ms    17 ms  74.125.37.95
                                  7    15 ms    15 ms    15 ms  209.85.250.121
                                  8    16 ms    16 ms    16 ms  google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N Offline
                                  NOYB
                                  last edited by

                                  No the hop #2 time out is not significant.  Just means that router does not respond to pings.
                                  Don't see any of the 400 to 800 ms pings you mentioned in the opening post.

                                  That doesn't look too bad really.  Here's what it looks like from here for comparison.

                                  
                                  Tracing route to ec2-54-93-175-114.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com [54.93.175.114]
                                  over a maximum of 30 hops:
                                  
                                    1     1 ms    <1 ms     1 ms  pfSense.localdomain [192.168.2.1]
                                    2     6 ms     5 ms     6 ms  static-50-53-160-1.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.53.160.1]
                                    3     6 ms     5 ms     5 ms  50.38.7.201
                                    4    19 ms    37 ms    30 ms  ae2---0.cor02.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [74.40.1.181]
                                    5    20 ms    22 ms    20 ms  ae3---0.cor01.plal.ca.frontiernet.net [74.40.1.225]
                                    6    21 ms    48 ms    22 ms  ae0---0.cbr01.plal.ca.frontiernet.net [74.40.3.150]
                                    7    21 ms    22 ms    19 ms  xe-0.paix.plalca01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [198.32.176.14]
                                    8   231 ms   232 ms   232 ms  ae-15.r01.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.33]
                                    9    22 ms    23 ms    22 ms  ae-1.r22.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.26]
                                   10    88 ms    88 ms   112 ms  ae-8.r21.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.5.16]
                                   11   132 ms   142 ms   140 ms  ae-0.r20.chcgil09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.97]
                                   12    89 ms    95 ms    88 ms  ae-5.r23.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.167]
                                   13   231 ms   232 ms   235 ms  ae-6.r21.frnkge03.de.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.181]
                                   14     *      229 ms   222 ms  ae-1.r02.frnkge03.de.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.163]
                                   15   169 ms   174 ms   177 ms  212.119.27.174
                                   16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
                                   17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
                                   18   170 ms   170 ms   175 ms  54.239.5.134
                                   19   169 ms   169 ms   169 ms  ec2-54-93-175-114.eu-central-1.compute.amazonaws.com [54.93.175.114]
                                  
                                  Trace complete.
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  Tracing route to google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
                                  over a maximum of 30 hops:
                                  
                                    1     1 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  pfSense.localdomain [192.168.2.1]
                                    2     6 ms     5 ms     5 ms  static-50-53-160-1.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.53.160.1]
                                    3     7 ms     7 ms     8 ms  50.38.7.201
                                    4    12 ms    10 ms    12 ms  ae2---0.cor02.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [74.40.1.181]
                                    5     9 ms    10 ms    10 ms  ae0---0.cor01.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [74.40.1.185]
                                    6    10 ms    12 ms    10 ms  ae4---0.cor01.sttl.wa.frontiernet.net [74.40.1.221]
                                    7    20 ms    18 ms    15 ms  ae0---0.cbr01.sttl.wa.frontiernet.net [74.40.5.122]
                                    8    10 ms    12 ms    11 ms  74.40.26.131
                                    9    10 ms    10 ms    10 ms  72.14.238.181
                                   10    10 ms    10 ms    10 ms  209.85.245.67
                                   11    10 ms    10 ms    10 ms  google-public-dns-a.google.com [8.8.8.8]
                                  
                                  Trace complete.
                                  
                                  
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • N Offline
                                    NOYB
                                    last edited by

                                    Oh and by the way that hop #2 is probably the default gateway.  So no wonder apinger was having trouble.

                                    So it was probably detecting and marking the WAN interface as down.  That's probably why the VPN was going down.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • X Offline
                                      xman111
                                      last edited by

                                      hate to sound like any more of a dumbass but is there a way to fix that?

                                      i did another clean install and now am only using WAN and LAN.  I also tried plugging my WAN into the other Intel NIC which gets me a different IP address from my ISP to just test, didn't seem to make a difference.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • N Offline
                                        NOYB
                                        last edited by

                                        Configure apinger to monitor the next available hop.  Or leave apinger disabled.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • X Offline
                                          xman111
                                          last edited by

                                          thanks NOYB, i configured it to the 2nd hop and am not getting any errors, thanks for the tip.  If it gives me any problems, i will disable it but i kind of like having it on. Going to try to setup OpenVPN client tomorrow to see how it works.  Have a good night.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • X Offline
                                            xman111
                                            last edited by

                                            got the VPN up and working, seems to be better.  Having a few VPN errors though.  Not sure if it is totally taking the tunnel down or just reporting.  Going to google this a little.

                                            Oct 31 13:20:19 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected
                                            Oct 31 13:20:19 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'status 2'
                                            Oct 31 13:20:19 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state 1'
                                            Oct 31 13:20:19 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client connected from /var/etc/openvpn/client1.sock
                                            Oct 31 13:17:24 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected
                                            Oct 31 13:17:24 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'status 2'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:24 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state 1'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:24 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client connected from /var/etc/openvpn/client1.sock
                                            Oct 31 13:17:23 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected
                                            Oct 31 13:17:23 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'status 2'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:23 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state 1'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:23 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client connected from /var/etc/openvpn/client1.sock
                                            Oct 31 13:17:22 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected
                                            Oct 31 13:17:22 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'status 2'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:22 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state 1'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:22 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client connected from /var/etc/openvpn/client1.sock
                                            Oct 31 13:17:14 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected
                                            Oct 31 13:17:14 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'status 2'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:14 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state 1'
                                            Oct 31 13:17:14 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client connected from /var/etc/openvpn/client1.sock
                                            Oct 31 13:16:43 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: Client disconnected
                                            Oct 31 13:16:43 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'status 2'
                                            Oct 31 13:16:43 openvpn[53731]: MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state 1'

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.