• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

PfSense on ARM

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
6 Posts 3 Posters 8.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    jwt Netgate
    last edited by May 26, 2016, 1:17 PM

    https://twitter.com/gonzopancho/status/735704319874371584

    Also note the version 2.4, based on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • F
      Forsaked
      last edited by May 26, 2016, 5:08 PM

      Let's see how this gonna perform with the new AMD Opteron A or Cavium ThunderX processors while waiting for Intel Denverton.

      pfSense: 2.4.3

      System: QOTOM-Q355G4
      CPU: Intel Core i5-5250U
      RAM: 8GB SK Hynix DDR3L-1600
      LAN: Intel I211-AT
      SSD: 256GB Lite-On

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jwt Netgate
        last edited by Jun 1, 2016, 6:56 AM

        @Forsaked:

        Let's see how this gonna perform with the new AMD Opteron A or Cavium ThunderX processors while waiting for Intel Denverton.

        You'll be… waiting a while for Denverton.  Not that I know anything about Denverton.

        However, we did boot FreeBSD -CURRENT on uFW earlier tonight.

        https://twitter.com/gonzopancho/status/737874921435594753

        pfSense is next.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jwt Netgate
          last edited by Jun 1, 2016, 8:16 AM

          and now pfSense runs on uFW

          https://twitter.com/gonzopancho/status/737918774582579200

          IMG_3101.jpg
          IMG_3101.jpg_thumb
          ![Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png)
          ![Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png_thumb)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bennyc
            last edited by Jun 1, 2016, 8:50 AM

            That looks tiny (size) for a firewall, I like it  8)
            Any idea what NAT throughput is to be expected?

            4x XG-7100 (2xHA), 1x SG-4860, 1x SG-2100
            1x PC Engines APU2C4, 1x PC Engines APU1C4

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jwt Netgate
              last edited by Jun 1, 2016, 7:42 PM

              @bennyc:

              That looks tiny (size) for a firewall, I like it  8)
              Any idea what NAT throughput is to be expected?

              Quoting throughput needs to wait until we don't have full debugging on.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              6 out of 6
              • First post
                6/6
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                consent.not_received