Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense on ARM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    6 Posts 3 Posters 8.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jwt Netgate
      last edited by

      https://twitter.com/gonzopancho/status/735704319874371584

      Also note the version 2.4, based on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ForsakedF
        Forsaked
        last edited by

        Let's see how this gonna perform with the new AMD Opteron A or Cavium ThunderX processors while waiting for Intel Denverton.

        pfSense: 2.4.3

        System: QOTOM-Q355G4
        CPU: Intel Core i5-5250U
        RAM: 8GB SK Hynix DDR3L-1600
        LAN: Intel I211-AT
        SSD: 256GB Lite-On

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jwt Netgate
          last edited by

          @Forsaked:

          Let's see how this gonna perform with the new AMD Opteron A or Cavium ThunderX processors while waiting for Intel Denverton.

          You'll be… waiting a while for Denverton.  Not that I know anything about Denverton.

          However, we did boot FreeBSD -CURRENT on uFW earlier tonight.

          https://twitter.com/gonzopancho/status/737874921435594753

          pfSense is next.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jwt Netgate
            last edited by

            and now pfSense runs on uFW

            https://twitter.com/gonzopancho/status/737918774582579200

            IMG_3101.jpg
            IMG_3101.jpg_thumb
            ![Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png)
            ![Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-06-01 at 3.01.57 AM.png_thumb)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bennyc
              last edited by

              That looks tiny (size) for a firewall, I like it  8)
              Any idea what NAT throughput is to be expected?

              4x XG-7100 (2xHA), 1x SG-4860, 1x SG-2100
              1x PC Engines APU2C4, 1x PC Engines APU1C4

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jwt Netgate
                last edited by

                @bennyc:

                That looks tiny (size) for a firewall, I like it  8)
                Any idea what NAT throughput is to be expected?

                Quoting throughput needs to wait until we don't have full debugging on.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.