Using pfSense's time server
-
I have enabled NTP within pfSense with 5 Time Servers but I can't get any of the clients on the LAN to update to the correct time.
If I run 'daytime 192.168.1.1' I get no response. If I run 'daytime time.nist.gov' it works.
What am I doing wrong?
Daytime doesn't use ntp, it uses an older, simpler protocol. I think…
-
What do you see if you use ntpq to check your ntp setup?
Checking my pf sense box at 172.16.0.1 from one of my clients gets me the responses below.
p490:/home/stan # ntpq -p 172.16.0.1 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +server.home 172.16.0.4 2 u 97 512 377 0.177 -1.046 0.130 *pi-v1.home .GPS0. 1 u 119 512 377 0.578 -0.353 0.155 +ntp.cox.net .GPS. 1 u 91 512 377 51.263 1.371 0.995 p490:/home/stan # ntpq -pn 172.16.0.1 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +172.16.0.2 172.16.0.4 2 u 110 512 377 0.177 -1.046 0.130 *172.16.0.4 .GPS0. 1 u 132 512 377 0.578 -0.353 0.155 +68.0.14.76 .GPS. 1 u 104 512 377 51.263 1.371 0.995I'm using a Raspberry Pi GPS clock at 172.16.0.4 for my preferred server, peering with a local server at 172.16.0.2 backed up with my ISP's ntp server at 68.0.14.76 in case the Pi has issues.
-
Do you have the LAN interface selected?
Yes, I have LAN set on. Just wondered what ADMIN signified…
What should I run on the client to get the time synchronised?
-
Daytime doesn't use ntp, it uses an older, simpler protocol. I think…
What should I use instead?
-
What do you see if you use ntpq to check your ntp setup?
Checking my pf sense box at 172.16.0.1 from one of my clients gets me the responses below.
p490:/home/stan # ntpq -p 172.16.0.1 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +server.home 172.16.0.4 2 u 97 512 377 0.177 -1.046 0.130 *pi-v1.home .GPS0. 1 u 119 512 377 0.578 -0.353 0.155 +ntp.cox.net .GPS. 1 u 91 512 377 51.263 1.371 0.995 p490:/home/stan # ntpq -pn 172.16.0.1 remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +172.16.0.2 172.16.0.4 2 u 110 512 377 0.177 -1.046 0.130 *172.16.0.4 .GPS0. 1 u 132 512 377 0.578 -0.353 0.155 +68.0.14.76 .GPS. 1 u 104 512 377 51.263 1.371 0.995I'm using a Raspberry Pi GPS clock at 172.16.0.4 for my preferred server, peering with a local server at 172.16.0.2 backed up with my ISP's ntp server at 68.0.14.76 in case the Pi has issues.
What is a RPi GPS clock? And are you running FreeBSD on the Pi?
NTPQ worked ok.
-
I'm using this board to get a GPS based clock on the Raspberry Pi, added the external antenna to improve the signal through my roof.
https://www.adafruit.com/products/2324
If ntpq worked then your ntp server is set up, running and accessible so all you need is a ntp client for your lan machines. What works depends on what os you are running.
-
I looked into a Raspberry Pi GPS, but based on what I could find, the jitter and offset was almost always worse than what I get to public Stratum 1 NTP servers.
-
Were you looking at one of the USB based GPS setups?
The Adafruit version (two available, dumb board or hat board) provides direct serial and PPS support and as you can see from my ntpq numbers it is beating my ISP's ntp system. I found that when using pool servers or specific public ones ntp usually picked the Pi as the peer (shown by the * on the ntpq line) so I pulled them from my config files.
Did you find an ntp client for your machines and is it working now?
-
jitter and offset to what? The time from gps? All you really need that for is to get the pps within 1 second. The actual thing that is keeping the time accurate is the pps signal. And there your going to be right on the money..
current host set to pi3-ntp.local.lan ntpq> pe remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== oPPS(0) .PPS. 0 l 10 16 377 0.000 0.004 0.003 *SHM(0) .GPSD. 1 l 10 16 377 0.000 -8.559 5.031To be honest you don't even need the time from the gps if you have internet connectivity you can just use a time from a stratum 1 on the net that is close to you. Its the pps signal from the board that is what is useful. The time from gps just gets you close if you have no access to any other ntp server.
I would have to look at what was going on yesterday afternoon evening on why it got a little haywired - but even then your talking 20 microseconds off, not miliseconds. Normally it is within 5micro seconds. Which for the < than $100 it cost to put together. I pretty sure that is pretty freaking good ;) Way better then your going to get syncing off the internet.
My pfsense runs in vm, so its kind of useless as ntp server. I just point it my pi ntp server. As I do every other machine on the network.
edit: I added all the graphs going back to monthly and yearly. You can see the little pi keeps pretty good time.. if you look at the average offset with the 20 added to it your talking right on the money off by couple of microseconds.. I am very happy with the pi as a ntp server, and you can not beat the cost and a fun little project to get going.. That is if your into that sort of thing like any respecting uber geek would be ;)
-
Daytime doesn't use ntp, it uses an older, simpler protocol. I think…
What should I use instead?
ntpdate -q
-
Daytime doesn't use ntp, it uses an older, simpler protocol. I think…
What should I use instead?
ntpdate -q
The FreeBSD version ntpdate works fine, but when I run an OS/2 version I get
C:\usr\bin>ntpdate.exe -q -d 192.168.1.1
9 Jun 20:41:21 C:\usr\bin\ntpdate.exe[13633]: ntpd 4.2.0-os2-emx build 2
Looking for host 192.168.1.1 and service ntp
host found : pfSense.localdomain
transmit(192.168.1.1)
receive(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
receive(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
192.168.1.1: Server dropped: strata too high
server 192.168.1.1, port 123
stratum 16, precision -6, leap 11, trust 000
refid [192.168.1.1], delay 0.02557, dispersion 24.06950
transmitted 4, in filter 4
reference time: 00000000.00000000 Thu, Feb 7 2036 6:28:16.000
originate timestamp: db0444e1.d1eb851e Thu, Jun 9 2016 20:41:21.820
transmit timestamp: db0444e2.deb851eb Thu, Jun 9 2016 20:41:22.870
filter delay: 0.02557 0.04124 0.00000 0.00000
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
filter offset: 0.139033 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
delay 0.02557, dispersion 24.06950
offset 0.1390339 Jun 20:41:23 C:\usr\bin\ntpdate.exe[13633]: no server suitable for synchronization found
Can't say that any of that means anything to me….
Incidentally looking at the FreeBSD man page
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ntpdate&sektion=8
it says
After a
suitable period of mourning, the ntpdate utility is to be retired from
this distribution. -
That is saying your ntp server is not well, stratum 16 is about equal in accuracy to a sundial! :-)
192.168.1.1: Server dropped: strata too high server 192.168.1.1, port 123 stratum 16, precision -6, leap 11, trust 000ntp docs here:
http://www.ntp.org/documentation.html
-
For comparison I just tried the same command from a FreeBSD system
root@Desktop:~ # ntpdate -q -d 192.168.1.1
10 Jun 10:21:56 ntpdate[5544]: ntpdate 4.2.8p6-a (1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
receive(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
receive(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
receive(192.168.1.1)
transmit(192.168.1.1)
receive(192.168.1.1)
server 192.168.1.1, port 123
stratum 3, precision -19, leap 00, trust 000
refid [192.168.1.1], delay 0.02594, dispersion 0.00002
transmitted 4, in filter 4
reference time: db0503de.fb41da29 Fri, Jun 10 2016 10:16:14.981
originate timestamp: db05053a.fd647e67 Fri, Jun 10 2016 10:22:02.989
transmit timestamp: db05053a.ee249963 Fri, Jun 10 2016 10:22:02.930
filter delay: 0.02600 0.02597 0.02594 0.02599
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
filter offset: 0.059365 0.059361 0.059325 0.059352
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
delay 0.02594, dispersion 0.00002
offset 0.05932510 Jun 10:22:02 ntpdate[5544]: adjust time server 192.168.1.1 offset 0.059325 sec
I guess this shows a problem with the program I'm usingon OS/2.
-
ntpd 4.2.0-
That is a OLD version of ntp.. That is prob why your having problems.. And works from the system using 4.2.8p6
4.2.0 is from 2003 for gosh sake..
-
I would have to look at what was going on yesterday afternoon evening on why it got a little haywired - but even then your talking 20 microseconds off, not miliseconds. Normally it is within 5micro seconds. Which for the < than $100 it cost to put together. I pretty sure that is pretty freaking good ;) Way better then your going to get syncing off the internet.
My information could be old, but it seems the issue in the reviews was not so much how accurate the PI was able to stay with GPS, but other computer's ability to sync with the PI was hindered by the USB Ethernet making for "poor" quality by some definition of poor.
Active Peer 208.100.4.52 216.86.146.46 2 u 14 256 377 11.469 0.457 0.332
Candidate 67.202.100.50 216.86.146.46 2 u 174 256 377 11.859 0.666 0.166
Outlier 216.239.36.15 92.118.64.39 2 u 198 256 377 35.324 -0.364 0.334
Outlier 216.152.240.220 164.67.62.194 2 u 165 256 377 63.997 0.363 0.173You know it's good when 0.3ms offset is considered an "Outlier".
-
My pi serves up to pool, hundreds of connections all the time…
ntpq> monstats enabled: 0x1 addresses: 3097 peak addresses: 3097 maximum addresses: 14563 reclaim above count: 600 reclaim older than: 64 kilobytes: 218 maximum kilobytes: 1024 ntpq>ntpq> mrulist
Ctrl-C will stop MRU retrieval and display partial results.
^Cmrulist retrieval interrupted by operator.
Displaying partial client list.
Retrieved 1654 unique MRU entries and 0 updates.So pretty sure it can handle serving up ntp to your network just fine…
Here is my workstation that syncs with my pi, and I have the poll really short
> ntpq ntpq> pe remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== *pi3-ntp.local.l .PPS. 1 u 12 32 377 0.266 -0.015 0.007 ntpq> -
Those are much better stats. Better drivers and hardware I bet. Thank you sir, I now have a new project to plan for.
-
I'm using a very old, non-turbo Pi v1, so old it had to be modified to allow the GPS HAT to mount on it. No tweaks to the basic Raspberrian OS except I don't start the X server on it since it isn't needed with SSH access.
The timekeeping on the Pi is pretty good as yhis ntpq from a ssh to the pi shows:
pi@pi-v1 ~ $ ntpq -p remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== oGPS_NMEA(0) .GPS0. 0 l 8 8 377 0.000 0.002 0.004 pi@pi-v1 ~ $That there is some issue on the Pi, as can be seen here compared to the pfSense system, the delay and jitter on the Piare higher, which I attribute that to the weak Ethernet.
t3400-n:/home/stan # ntpq -p server.home remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== *pi-v1.home .GPS0. 1 u 361 1024 377 0.549 0.274 0.033 +pfSense.home 172.16.0.4 2 u 442 1024 377 0.206 0.020 0.055 server.home .INIT. 16 u - 1024 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 +ntp.cox.net .GPS. 1 u 956 1024 377 51.861 1.931 0.297 t3400-n:/home/stan # 1 u 956 1024 377 51.861 1.931 0.297 t3400-n:/home/stan #If the attachments work here the first is a full ntp display, it is pretty much swamped by the high disp plot. The second is the same plot with the disp line suppressed.
Still for under $100 it is going to be hard to get a more convenient or accurate local time server. I find it quite nice to have my time stable even when the WAN is down due to ISP or equipment problems. Pi, GPS HAT, power brick and remote antenna, throw in a case if you feel fancy. You can also find the old v1 Pi boards dirt cheap as folks move to the v2 or v3 ones.
-
Makes me want to dig out my Pi …. What OS are you running on it? Last time I tried I couldn't get FreeBSD installed on it.
I don't suppose pfSense would work on it :)....
-
Nope, pfSense won't run but using the basic Pi OS and following the help in the forums I have mine running. It works well enough that I don't pay any attention to it for months on end.
Basic forum topic: https://forums.adafruit.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=70133
I'd start reading it about here to miss the initial confusion: https://forums.adafruit.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=70133&start=60#p359668
I got involved a bit later: https://forums.adafruit.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=70133&start=90#p360387
A bit on the network delay in the Pi: https://forums.adafruit.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=70133&start=150#p389708
If you search the Adafruit forums on GPS you'll hit a few more topics that apply to newer hardware and later OS releases.
