Performance mystery with PIA on pfsense
-
Found this: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=88758.0 Sounds like exactly what I've got going on.
-
so did you solved just increaseing the TCP/UDP socket send and receive buffers size?
if you want to try, these are my custom options:
explicit-exit-notify 2;
ifconfig-nowarn;
tls-client;
persist-key;
persist-tun;
remote-cert-tls server;
reneg-sec 0;
auth-nocache;
tls-cipher TLS-DHE-RSA-WITH-AES-256-GCM-SHA384;
fast-io;
sndbuf 524288;
rcvbuf 524288 -
I added
fast-io;
sndbuf 524288;
rcvbuf 524288to my config and can get about 70Mbps down now. I'll keep trying, but I'm traveling this week and have only remote access to my network so it's kind of difficult to really gauge the performance without other factors getting in the way. Thanks for the advice.
-
Very good, it's a 40% increase!
If you have not already done, you may try to activate PowerD in "Maximum" mode in System-Advanced-Miscellaneous and, if supported, to enable AES-NI in Cryptographic Hardware.
Anyway it may be possible that's close to the limit reached by the Sempron 2650.
To find it out, you should perform the test suggested by Ira in
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105238.msg616743#msg616743Run from the GUI:
openvpn –genkey --secret /tmp/secret
and
time openvpn --test-crypto --secret /tmp/secret --verb 0 --tun-mtu 20000 --cipher aes-256-cbcThen to give the execution time in seconds in real-world meaning:
(3200 / execution_time_seconds) = Projected Maximum Performance OpenVPN in MbpsAs you can see from what I have tested in
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115673.msg642058#msg642058
CPUs in the same class may have different performance depending on the presence AES-NI support.Please, let me know your benchmark.
-
The performance test with AES-NI enabled gives me a theoretical max of 92Mbps.
-
With a benchmark like that I would have expected about 100 Mbps in download.
I regret not being able to help you more.
The only thing I can add to the info about my settings is that I'm running the 2.3.2 stable version.
If you will solve the issue, I'd like to read the adopted solution.
Cheers -
i've got 200mbps but can only seem to get 20mbps via pia
I have a
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6400 CPU @ 2.70GHz
2 CPUs: 2 package(s) x 1 core(s)and the following custom options
auth-user-pass /etc/openvpn-password.txt;
fast-io;
sndbuf 524288;
rcvbuf 524288AES cryptographic is enabled,
if you find a way to improve it it would be great to know
thanks!
-
@techy82
just out of curiosity, what PIA server are you connecting? -
new york city
-
new york city
Never tried. I usually go through denmark or sweden and with the configuration above I easily get the limit of the line (100Mbps)
-
I regret not being able to help you more.
You've helped plenty. Thanks. Once I get home from my travels and am not testing remotely I'll be able to try tweaking a few more settings. Worst case I buy an Athlon 5350 or 5370 for a 50% + single thread improvement.
-
new york city
Never tried. I usually go through denmark or sweden and with the configuration above I easily get the limit of the line (100Mbps)
I'll try some different servers later and see how that goes, Thanks
-
pfSense 2.3.2. using PIA with 2 OpenVPN clients combined in one Gateway Group (PIA could not deliver coding/decoding speed with one connection).
Get full ISP speed (500/500 Mbit) with CPU load of ~30%
Hardware: intel i5-3450
VPN- AES-256-CBC
- SHA256
- fast-io;
- sndbuf 524288;
- rcvbuf 524288
- Hardware acceleration enabled.
- 2 fixed (same country as client) IP adresses for PIA.
So it should not be PIA restricted, seems CPU restricted.
-
pfSense 2.3.2. using PIA with 2 OpenVPN clients combined in one Gateway Group (PIA could not deliver coding/decoding speed with one connection).
Get full ISP speed (500/500 Mbit) with CPU load of ~30%
Hardware: intel i5-3450
VPN- AES-256-CBC
- SHA256
- fast-io;
- sndbuf 524288;
- rcvbuf 524288
- Hardware acceleration enabled.
- 2 fixed (same country as client) IP adresses for PIA.
So it should not be PIA restricted, seems CPU restricted.
This is interesting.
How do you set the priority in the group? Both Tier 1 I guess.
And what speed did you get using only one OpenVPN client? -
Indeed, both tier 1.
When using Blowfish (only option in the past), I could not push it above 200Mbit and unstable. By then I came up with the 2 client setup and that worked like a charm.
Recently I switched to AES and with a quick test it seems that it could handle ISP speed also with one connection. I stick with 2 connection for stability and extra security reasons. -
Thanks for your reply.
I'm curious about the OpenVPN performance of various CPUs because of a future upgrade of my line and your CPU seems really interesting from my point of view.
If you are willing, could you performed the simple OpenVPN benchmark referenced here?
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=105238.msg616743#msg616743 (Reply # 9 message)From the GUI run
openvpn –genkey --secret / tmp / secret
--test time openvpn-crypto --secret / tmp / secret --verb 0 --tun-mtu 20000 --cipher aes-256-cbc
Then to give the execution time in seconds in real-world meaning:
(3200 / execution_time_seconds) = Projected Maximum Performance OpenVPN in MbpsMy Celeron N3150 gets a value of 116 Mbps that's the same value that normally reaches during download trough a PIA client.
-
Execution time = 9.433 seconds, so Projected Maximum Performance = 339 Mbit.
Does this represent single core performance?
Edit: In this case it does not represent maximum performance. It could easly push 500Mbit with ~30% load.
-
As far as I know OpenVPN works in single thread, but I could be wrong… anyway your CPU is a beast! ;)
Thanks for letting me know. -
Not sure if this will help, but try turning off the Hardware Crypto setting in pfSense:
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115627.0
-
If OpenVPN is indeed single threaded you can try multiple clients like me.
Looks like your Celeron has multiple cores.