Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PC Engines apu2 experiences

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    711 Posts 73 Posters 767.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      j4k3
      last edited by

      Thanks for the insight, I managed to finally get close to 1Gbps on the lan interface.

      I had to uncheck Disable hardware large receive offload, and Disable hardware TCP segmentation offload

      Under System > Advanced > Networking

      Based on what I've read so far I know this unit won't route more than 500 Mbps or so but I wanted to at least understand why, the nic was so hobbled right off the bat.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • cwagzC
        cwagz
        last edited by

        I am looking for some opinions on downsizing my current pfSense system with an APU2C4.

        Currently I have:
        Supermicro A1SRI-2558
        8GB Ram
        120GB SSD
        Akasa Fanless Enclosure

        There are 6 people in my house and 30 or so devices.  I am the only person that ever uses OpenVPN and it is usually from a mobile device on LTE so OpenVPN performance is probably not a huge deal.  I run Squid and Squidguard to proxy the internet for my kids.  Our internet connection is FiOS 150/150 Mbps.

        It seems like I could build an apu2c4 and sell my current hardware.  I would probably have money left over and a smaller, slightly cooler running device for pfSense.

        Do you guys see any potential performance issues or reasons why this is a bad idea?

        Netgate 6100 MAX

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Stugots
          last edited by

          Does anyone know of a way to enable TRIM support on the SSD without having to boot of a recovery device?  Is there some sort of tunable where it can be enabled on the next reboot?

          PC Engines APU2C4

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            AndrewZ
            last edited by

            @acascianelli:

            Does anyone know of a way to enable TRIM support on the SSD without having to boot of a recovery device?

            https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66622.0
            https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113803.msg633795#msg633795

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              lachendichatz
              last edited by

              I switched from A1SRI-2758/8GB to apu2c4 as I need the 2758 for another server.

              Running iperf3 between two pcs connected by the apu (pfsense 2.3.2) I get
              600Mbit/s in one direction
              615Mbit/s in the other one.
              CPU runs at 25% load, e.g. one core is maxed out.

              I probably see different speeds because I already imported my old firewall rules and have three rules on one nic and around 20 on the other one.

              I observed the same speed & load when I installed debian and configured a few iptable rules.

              Adding more clients (iperf -P 8 ) gives me:
              940Mbit/s direction a
              690Mbit/s direction b
              880MBit/s duplex

              Enabling (disabling unchecked) segmentation offload gives me
              940Mbit/s direction a
              695Mbit/s direction b
              940Mbit/s duplex
              CPU runs at 85%

              Speedtest (init7) shows me 930down/940up. Initially I got 720/920 & 670/920 but that was because of my slow laptop (sigh). Restarting firefox gave me consistent speeds around 940.

              So I can route a single TCP connection at 600Mbit/s per core. One could probably achieve higher speeds by tuning ISR related configs but as I can saturate my gigabit line with multiple connections I won't change settings.

              I set igb_numqueue to 4 and mbuf to 1mio. Unknown if it had an effect.
              Somebody suggested to set a rx/tx level (or queue? dont remeber) to 8k. That did not have an effect.
              powerD disabled/enabled (hiadaptive) did not make a difference

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                Stugots
                last edited by

                @AndrewZ:

                @acascianelli:

                Does anyone know of a way to enable TRIM support on the SSD without having to boot of a recovery device?

                https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=66622.0
                https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=113803.msg633795#msg633795

                Is there no way to set it so that it's enabled on the next reboot without going into single user mode?

                PC Engines APU2C4

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  Is there no way to set it so that it's enabled on the next reboot without going into single user mode?

                  Actually is there no way or workaround, as I am informed right.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kevindd992002
                    last edited by

                    @j4k3:

                    Thanks for the insight, I managed to finally get close to 1Gbps on the lan interface.

                    I had to uncheck Disable hardware large receive offload, and Disable hardware TCP segmentation offload

                    Under System > Advanced > Networking

                    Based on what I've read so far I know this unit won't route more than 500 Mbps or so but I wanted to at least understand why, the nic was so hobbled right off the bat.

                    Does that mean these two should be unchecked to get the full potential of the NIC's of the APU2C4? Any disadvantages of keeping them unchecked (enabled)?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      hda
                      last edited by

                      @kevindd992002:

                      … Any disadvantages of keeping them unchecked (enabled)?

                      Possibly, like no or a snappy WAN-PPPoE connection.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        hda
                        last edited by

                        @acascianelli:

                        …Is there no way to set it so that it's enabled on the next reboot without going into single user mode?

                        https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=121515.msg673176#msg673176 / pfSense 2.4

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kevindd992002
                          last edited by

                          @hda:

                          @kevindd992002:

                          … Any disadvantages of keeping them unchecked (enabled)?

                          Possibly, like no or a snappy WAN-PPPoE connection.

                          But why is the NIC performance hampered with these settings disabled anyway?

                          @hda:

                          @acascianelli:

                          …Is there no way to set it so that it's enabled on the next reboot without going into single user mode?

                          https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=121515.msg673176#msg673176 / pfSense 2.4

                          So if I understand this correctly, a fresh install of 2.4 will already enabled TRIM automatically with no user intervention? And same goes with older versions of pfsense that upgrade 2.4, TRIM will be enabled?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            doktornotor Banned
                            last edited by

                            @kevindd992002:

                            But why is the NIC performance hampered with these settings disabled anyway?

                            You clearly are confused. When you check them, you DISable the HW offloading features.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kevindd992002
                              last edited by

                              I don't think I am. Clearly, unchecking the boxes = ENABLES these features. checking the boxes=DISABLES these features. It's very easy to distinguish between the two.

                              j4k3 said in his post: "I had to uncheck Disable hardware large receive offload, and Disable hardware TCP segmentation offload". Which means that enabling (very different from "checking") them improves performance.

                              So then I asked: "But why is the NIC performance hampered with these settings disabled anyway?". Or in other words: "why is the NIC performance hampered with the boxes CHECKED anyway?"

                              Does that make sense? Again, disable=checked and enabled=unchecked. Please check the terminologies that I used in my posts.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                Guest
                                last edited by

                                Does that mean these two should be unchecked to get the full potential of the NIC's of the APU2C4?

                                Here under this link you will be able to read what is really needed for getting 1 GBit/s at the
                                WAN interface, there is told something likes, Server grade hardware and ~2,0GHz CPU speed.
                                And as I see it right the APU1D4 and APU2C4 are only sorted with something around ~1,1GHz
                                or 1,2GHz CPU power, that's it in short. Please read under under CPU selection

                                Any disadvantages of keeping them unchecked (enabled)?

                                Tunings and pimps can be done on each machine for sure to high up the
                                throughput but in that case, you should be followed to that guidance
                                from above at first.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • cwagzC
                                  cwagz
                                  last edited by

                                  @cwagz:

                                  I am looking for some opinions on downsizing my current pfSense system with an APU2C4.

                                  Currently I have:
                                  Supermicro A1SRI-2558
                                  8GB Ram
                                  120GB SSD
                                  Akasa Fanless Enclosure

                                  There are 6 people in my house and 30 or so devices.  I am the only person that ever uses OpenVPN and it is usually from a mobile device on LTE so OpenVPN performance is probably not a huge deal.  I run Squid and Squidguard to proxy the internet for my kids.  Our internet connection is FiOS 150/150 Mbps.

                                  It seems like I could build an apu2c4 and sell my current hardware.  I would probably have money left over and a smaller, slightly cooler running device for pfSense.

                                  Do you guys see any potential performance issues or reasons why this is a bad idea?

                                  I went ahead and built the apu2c4 and am very happy with the outcome.  The performance seems to be the same for our usage.  Also, the overall footprint and heat output into my small network cabinet is improved.

                                  Netgate 6100 MAX

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • H
                                    HackedComputer
                                    last edited by

                                    Hey,

                                    I recently took delivery of an APU2C4. It is certainly a decent performer for the size of it!

                                    I am wondering, has anyone got the AES-NI to work with the OpenVPN? The reason I ask is that I don't appear to see any acceleration happening with AES-128-CBC / AES-256-CBC. The rough maximum I have achieved is 30Mbps.

                                    I have tried enabling the AES-NI within Advanced Options, and then enabling the cryptodev within OpenVPN. As well as disabling AES-NI and leaving Cryptodev enabled vice-versa.

                                    However, I see no changes whatsoever.

                                    I am on the latest PFSense 2.3.x release

                                    Kindest Regards
                                    HC

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      Guest
                                      last edited by

                                      I am wondering, has anyone got the AES-NI to work with the OpenVPN? The reason I ask is that I don't appear to see any acceleration happening with AES-128-CBC / AES-256-CBC. The rough maximum I have achieved is 30Mbps.

                                      From what total line speed you archived the 30Mbps? And how strong was the other VPN Peer end?

                                      I have tried enabling the AES-NI within Advanced Options, and then enabling the cryptodev within OpenVPN. As well as disabling AES-NI and leaving Cryptodev enabled vice-versa.

                                      At the moment only IPsec is really benefitting from the AES-NI, so you might be having
                                      perhaps more luck if the OpenVPN version 2.4 is out there.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • H
                                        HackedComputer
                                        last edited by

                                        From what total line speed you archived the 30Mbps? And how strong was the other VPN pear end?

                                        Connecting from a 317Mbps line, the other end is serviced by a 10Gbit (SFP) line @ Rackspace

                                        At the moment only IPsec is really benefitting from the AES-NI, so you might be having
                                        perhaps more luck if the OpenVPN version 2.4 is out there.

                                        I'll hold out, I'm not too fussed - I didn't expect a lot. But I expected a tad better as my old equipment was a dual core 800Mhz MiPS. I had tried the "fix" here:

                                        http://1101entrails.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/getting-aes-ni-to-work-using-pfsense-on.html

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • V
                                          VAMike
                                          last edited by

                                          @HackedComputer:

                                          At the moment only IPsec is really benefitting from the AES-NI, so you might be having
                                          perhaps more luck if the OpenVPN version 2.4 is out there.

                                          I'll hold out, I'm not too fussed - I didn't expect a lot. But I expected a tad better as my old equipment was a dual core 800Mhz MiPS. I had tried the "fix" here:

                                          http://1101entrails.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/getting-aes-ni-to-work-using-pfsense-on.html

                                          That page is mostly correct–openvpn does use aes-ni, having pfsense try to load any cryptographic stuff will slow things down, and you should be getting significantly more than 30Mbps. Make sure you're connecting with aes on the client side and turn off all the hardware crypto settings in pfsense.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • H
                                            HackedComputer
                                            last edited by

                                            Just an update:

                                            So, changing the cryptographic options within pfSense didn't yield any differences. Perhaps, by 5Mbps.

                                            However, I looked more into the OpenVPN configuration and appended the following to the client configuration:

                                            sndbuf 393216;
                                            rcvbuf 393216

                                            and thus, this was achieved:

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.