2.3.3 is live!

damienmci

Any issues going from 2.3.2_p1 to 2.3.3?

Like to pull the trigger, but would like to see release notes and any caveats first.

Jailer

Any issues going from 2.3.2_p1 to 2.3.3?

Like to pull the trigger, but would like to see release notes and any caveats first.

https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/2.3.3_New_Features_and_Changes

chpalmer

@damienmci:

Any issues going from 2.3.2_p1 to 2.3.3?

Like to pull the trigger, but would like to see release notes and any caveats first.

All my 2.3.2 boxes upgraded with no issues whatsoever.. Since I had a couple others running on 2.3.3RC before this Im pretty optimistic that everything is good.

damienmci

Done the upgrade to 2.3.3-RELEASE. No issues. Many thanks to the pfsense team for a wonderful product.

pppfsense

@damienmci:

Done the upgrade to 2.3.3-RELEASE. No issues. Many thanks to the pfsense team for a wonderful product.

Upgraded my main and backup 2.3.2p1 to 2.3.3 without issues.
I did see some warnings during the upgrade. Mostly about a couple of config files not being used anymore, but would like to see the full log
to make sure all my config went through. I am sure that log file is somewhere, but I took a video of the upgrade, so I'll go over it later.

I do like the new upgrade process. Kudos to the pfSense Team + Testers!

AhnHEL

Another hand up for a smooth upgrade if anyone is still on the fence about pulling the trigger.

;)

BIGGRIMTIM

@Jailer:

Did you reboot?

I did reboot twice just to make sure. When I check for updates it reports that I am up to date.

wcrowder

SWEET! :-*

juruteknik

repo is down now?

i've try it about 10 times

**** WARNING ****
Reboot will be required!!
Proceed with upgrade? (y/N) y

Downloading upgrade packages…
Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue...
pfSense-core repository is up-to-date.
Updating pfSense repository catalogue...
pfSense repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
Checking for upgrades (1 candidates): . done
Processing candidates (1 candidates): . done
The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):

Installed packages to be UPGRADED:
pfSense-kernel-pfSense: 2.3.2_1 -> 2.3.3 [pfSense-core]

Number of packages to be upgraded: 1

15 MiB to be downloaded.
Fetching pfSense-kernel-pfSense-2.3.3.txz: . done
pkg: https://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_3_3_amd64-core/All/pfSense-kernel-pfSense-2.3.3.txz: Operation timed out

Locking package pfSense-kernel-pfSense…
Locking pfSense-kernel-pfSense-2.3.2_1

Chucko

No issues here with an Atom D525 based system.

sparklyballs

Updated and cloud flare dynamic dns is no longer working

0.0.0.0 showing in widget

NOYB

Upgrade took about 40 minutes to extract everything and bootup.
Python and perl each took a really long time.

2.3.3-RELEASE (i386)
built on Thu Feb 16 06:59:50 CST 2017
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
2015 MiB

Couple questions re: console messages during upgrade.

Manually remove if no longer needed: /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem
Is this file still needed by pfSense? Don't think I have any need for it if pfSense doesn't.

What's are these makewhatis not found messages about?
[4/92] Extracting perl5…
makewhatis: not found
makewhatis: not found
[5/92] upgrading pcre…

openvpn-2.3.11: missing file /usr/local/man/man8/openvpn.8.gz
and a whole bunch of others for one of the lib* some things.
Would be nice if those could be suppressed if they are expected and not a problem. Believe they are just manual files that are being exclude in pfSense builds.

Jailer

Just successfully upgraded. I like the new traffic graph.

sgw

@chpalmer:

If you were on RC before you might want to wait.

I got it to work but it took some extra steps.

I am on 2.3.3-RC as well and console update doesn't find anything to update.
Seems I have to wait as well?
I'd like to go to stable now (instead of development), is that possible now without a reinstall?

phil.davis

On my 2.3.3-RC that was on "Stable" (because that is what was done when 2.3.3-DEVELOPMENT became 2.3.3-RC - to avoid ending up on 2.3.4-DEVELOPMENT), I:

switched to development on GUI Update Settings
used console option 13 to make it look for the development package database, and when it asked to upgrade I said N
switched back to stable on GUI update settings
used console option 13 again, and it found the "right" stable stuff, said "y" to upgrade

I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed, but for me it got the system recognize the "new stable" and upgrade to it.

sgw

@phil.davis:

On my 2.3.3-RC that was on "Stable" (because that is what was done when 2.3.3-DEVELOPMENT became 2.3.3-RC - to avoid ending up on 2.3.4-DEVELOPMENT), I:

switched to development on GUI Update Settings

used console option 13 to make it look for the development package database, and when it asked to upgrade I said N

switched back to stable on GUI update settings

used console option 13 again, and it found the "right" stable stuff, said "y" to upgrade

I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed, but for me it got the system recognize the "new stable" and upgrade to it.

worked for me as well, thank you!

doktornotor

@phil.davis:

I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed

Yeah I'm pretty sure the pkg thing urgently needs a brain transplant.

johnpoz

just upgraded my self.. took a bit but not all that long if you take into account all the changes. Pretty sure it said something like 89 packages to be upgraded..

Sofar all looks good…

The graphs scaling seems to be off? Pretty thin graphs.. Am I missing something here?

edit: Cleared cache - now looks normal.. Duhhh ;)

graphrealshort.png_thumb

normallooking.png_thumb

mudmanc4

Spectacular job once again pfsense team!

securityconscious

Everything appears to have gone ok.