Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    2.3.3 is live!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
    61 Posts 33 Posters 19.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • AhnHELA
      AhnHEL
      last edited by

      Another hand up for a smooth upgrade if anyone is still on the fence about pulling the trigger.

      ;)

      AhnHEL (Angel)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        BIGGRIMTIM
        last edited by

        @Jailer:

        Did you reboot?

        I did reboot twice just to make sure.  When I check for updates it reports that I am up to date.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          wcrowder
          last edited by

          SWEET!  :-*

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            juruteknik
            last edited by

            repo is down now?

            i've try it about 10 times

            **** WARNING ****
            Reboot will be required!!
            Proceed with upgrade? (y/N) y

            Downloading upgrade packages…
            Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue...
            pfSense-core repository is up-to-date.
            Updating pfSense repository catalogue...
            pfSense repository is up-to-date.
            All repositories are up-to-date.
            Checking for upgrades (1 candidates): . done
            Processing candidates (1 candidates): . done
            The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):

            Installed packages to be UPGRADED:
                    pfSense-kernel-pfSense: 2.3.2_1 -> 2.3.3 [pfSense-core]

            Number of packages to be upgraded: 1

            15 MiB to be downloaded.
            Fetching pfSense-kernel-pfSense-2.3.3.txz: . done
            pkg: https://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_3_3_amd64-core/All/pfSense-kernel-pfSense-2.3.3.txz: Operation timed out

            Locking package pfSense-kernel-pfSense…
            Locking pfSense-kernel-pfSense-2.3.2_1

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              Chucko
              last edited by

              No issues here with an Atom D525 based system.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • sparklyballsS
                sparklyballs
                last edited by

                Updated and cloud flare dynamic dns is no longer working

                0.0.0.0 showing in widget

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  NOYB
                  last edited by

                  Upgrade took about 40 minutes to extract everything and bootup.
                  Python and perl each took a really long time.

                  2.3.3-RELEASE (i386)
                  built on Thu Feb 16 06:59:50 CST 2017
                  FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16

                  Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
                  2015 MiB

                  Couple questions re: console messages during upgrade.

                  Manually remove if no longer needed: /usr/local/etc/ssl/cert.pem
                  Is this file still needed by pfSense?  Don't think I have any need for it if pfSense doesn't.

                  What's are these makewhatis not found messages about?
                  [4/92] Extracting perl5…
                  makewhatis: not found
                  makewhatis: not found
                  [5/92] upgrading pcre…

                  openvpn-2.3.11:  missing file /usr/local/man/man8/openvpn.8.gz
                  and a whole bunch of others for one of the lib* some things.
                  Would be nice if those could be suppressed if they are expected and not a problem.  Believe they are just manual files that are being exclude in pfSense builds.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JailerJ
                    Jailer
                    last edited by

                    Just successfully upgraded. I like the new traffic graph.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sgw
                      last edited by

                      @chpalmer:

                      If you were on RC before you might want to wait.

                      I got it to work but it took some extra steps.

                      I am on 2.3.3-RC as well and console update doesn't find anything to update.
                      Seems I have to wait as well?
                      I'd like to go to stable now (instead of development), is that possible now without a reinstall?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        phil.davis
                        last edited by

                        On my 2.3.3-RC that was on "Stable" (because that is what was done when 2.3.3-DEVELOPMENT became 2.3.3-RC - to avoid ending up on 2.3.4-DEVELOPMENT), I:

                        1. switched to development on GUI Update Settings
                        2. used console option 13 to make it look for the development package database, and when it asked to upgrade I said N
                        3. switched back to stable on GUI update settings
                        4. used console option 13 again, and it found the "right" stable stuff, said "y" to upgrade

                        I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed, but for me it got the system recognize the "new stable" and upgrade to it.

                        As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                        If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          sgw
                          last edited by

                          @phil.davis:

                          On my 2.3.3-RC that was on "Stable" (because that is what was done when 2.3.3-DEVELOPMENT became 2.3.3-RC - to avoid ending up on 2.3.4-DEVELOPMENT), I:

                          1. switched to development on GUI Update Settings
                          2. used console option 13 to make it look for the development package database, and when it asked to upgrade I said N
                          3. switched back to stable on GUI update settings
                          4. used console option 13 again, and it found the "right" stable stuff, said "y" to upgrade

                          I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed, but for me it got the system recognize the "new stable" and upgrade to it.

                          worked for me as well, thank you!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            doktornotor Banned
                            last edited by

                            @phil.davis:

                            I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed

                            Yeah I'm pretty sure the pkg thing urgently needs a brain transplant.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                              last edited by

                              just upgraded my self.. took a bit but not all that long if you take into account all the changes.  Pretty sure it said something like 89 packages to be upgraded..

                              Sofar all looks good…

                              The graphs scaling seems to be off?  Pretty thin graphs.. Am I missing something here?

                              edit:  Cleared cache - now looks normal..  Duhhh ;)

                              graphrealshort.png
                              graphrealshort.png_thumb
                              normallooking.png
                              normallooking.png_thumb

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • mudmanc4M
                                mudmanc4
                                last edited by

                                Spectacular job once again pfsense team!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  securityconscious
                                  last edited by

                                  Everything appears to have gone ok.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    kpa
                                    last edited by

                                    I had to switch to development branch once and then back to stable until I was offered the update to final 2.3.3 over the 2.3.3-RC I previously had. There were some error messages (the update page outright showed "Upgrade failed" after starting the update),  the update progress indicators and the output didn't quite match what was actually done, the system rebooted before the output indicated a succesful install of the required packages. The update worked fine though after the reboot.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      BIGGRIMTIM
                                      last edited by

                                      Am I the only one who is still showing 2.3.2 on the system info, but 2.3.3 in the update tab?  I am not sure if this is a big deal.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        Speed831
                                        last edited by

                                        @BIGGRIMTIM:

                                        Am I the only one who is still showing 2.3.2 on the system info, but 2.3.3 in the update tab?  I am not sure if this is a big deal.

                                        My dashboard is updated with 2.3.3-RELEASE (amd64)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • chpalmerC
                                          chpalmer
                                          last edited by

                                          @BIGGRIMTIM:

                                          Am I the only one who is still showing 2.3.2 on the system info, but 2.3.3 in the update tab?  I am not sure if this is a big deal.

                                          Try what Phil said above-

                                          On my 2.3.3-RC that was on "Stable" (because that is what was done when 2.3.3-DEVELOPMENT became 2.3.3-RC - to avoid ending up on 2.3.4-DEVELOPMENT), I:

                                          1. switched to development on GUI Update Settings
                                          2. used console option 13 to make it look for the development package database, and when it asked to upgrade I said N
                                          3. switched back to stable on GUI update settings
                                          4. used console option 13 again, and it found the "right" stable stuff, said "y" to upgrade

                                          I am not sure if that sequence should really be needed, but for me it got the system recognize the "new stable" and upgrade to it.

                                          Ive got one box that seems to want to stick to 2.3.2 as well..  Fought with it several times yesterday. Its nano and really slow..  Im trying this now.  Ill update if this works for this one.  All my others upgraded without a hitch.

                                          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                                          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            slimypizza
                                            last edited by

                                            I got the 2.3.3 Upgrade notification and after confirming, it seemed to go through the gyrations to do so but after my dual-Atom pfsense box automatically rebooted (and subsequent manual reboots by me), the version shows to be 2.3.2 RELEASE-P1 and "Unable to check for updates".  Will keep trying but unsure how to proceed.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.