Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel Atom C2xxx LPC failures

    Hardware
    39
    168
    46.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PippinP
      Pippin
      last edited by

      Found this:
      https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/freenas-mini-motherboard-clock-signal-issue.50582/#post-349195
      https://support.ixsystems.com/index.php?/Knowledgebase/Article/View/289

      Not sure what to think of this:

      any FreeNAS Mini or FreeNAS Mini XL manufactured on or after February 2017 will not have this issue

      They have workaround?

      I gloomily came to the ironic conclusion that if you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.
      Halton Arp

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        gcu_greyarea
        last edited by

        @Pippin:

        Found this:
        https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/freenas-mini-motherboard-clock-signal-issue.50582/#post-349195
        https://support.ixsystems.com/index.php?/Knowledgebase/Article/View/289

        Not sure what to think of this:

        any FreeNAS Mini or FreeNAS Mini XL manufactured on or after February 2017 will not have this issue

        They have workaround?

        It sounds to me like a company whose actions I respect, whose products I would buy and recommend to others.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          garyd9
          last edited by

          @Pippin:

          They have workaround?

          Yes, there's a platform level work-around for the issue.  That's in the original documentation from intel concerning the issue.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dipswitch
            last edited by

            Crap. My Kerio NG300 appliance (on pfsense) also runs on avoton (C2558). Asked them today about their policy, no response yet  :(

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JeGrJ
              JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator
              last edited by

              avoton C2558
              Avoton would be C2550, C2558 (8 as last digit) are Rangeleys

              Don't forget to upvote 👍 those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

              If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                severach
                last edited by

                No cold spares for me. Unlike most products pfSense runs on any computer in the junk box and 4 port Intel cards are dime-a-dozen. I tested the config copy tonight to make sure it works.

                Like they say in Aladdin: We all got cold spares!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  dopey
                  last edited by

                  In case anyone else has a supermicro board and wondered how this works I just asked them today:

                  "I'm inquiring about the currently known Intel C2000 cpu problem where the processor may fail unexpectedly over time. What are my options if I have an impacted motherboard?"

                  And this was the response i got less than an hour later:

                  "Thanks for contacting us regarding the Atom C2000.

                  You may submit a RMA at the following link to have the concerned issues addressed.  You may request the board to be cross-shipped during the RMA submission process.

                  https://www.supermicro.com/support/rma/"

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • G
                    garyd9
                    last edited by

                    @dopey:

                    You may request the board to be cross-shipped during the RMA submission process.

                    Yeah, you can request it.  Heh.  Unless you purchased the board directly from supermicro and it's within 90 days, they'll likely deny the request.

                    If they are doing it differently for this specific issue, PLEASE let me know.  When I called them, I was told that I had no options for cross shipping as it's been 6 months since I purchased (and because I purchased from Amazon.com.)

                    I just moved pfsense to a VM and submitted my RMA request this evening.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      dopey
                      last edited by

                      the RMA person rejected the cross-shipping.  I ordered my motherboard august 2015.

                      I responded with this:

                      This was the response i received from technical support regarding my inquiry:
                      Thanks for contacting us regarding the Atom C2000.

                      You may submit a RMA at the following link to have the concerned issues addressed.  You may request the board to be cross-shipped during the RMA submission process.

                      https://www.supermicro.com/support/rma/

                      They told me I may request cross-ship.

                      I was under the impression that the intel C2000 flaw couldn't be repaired and needed to be replaced.  My motherboard is still functioning but it's a critical piece of equipment for me (my router) and the downtime would be very inconvenient.

                      And an hour later I got my cross-ship RMA form :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        pfcode
                        last edited by

                        Hmmm, I submitted the RMA form,  but hours later, I got response: "This request only qualifies for repair service", ????

                        Release: pfSense 2.4.3(amd64)
                        M/B: Supermicro A1SRi-2558F
                        HDD: Intel X25-M 160G
                        RAM: 2x8Gb Kingston ECC ValueRAM
                        AP: Netgear R7000 (XWRT), Unifi AC Pro

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          dopey
                          last edited by

                          Try pushing back like I did.  It seemed to work :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            pfcode
                            last edited by

                            @dopey:

                            Try pushing back like I did.  It seemed to work :)

                            Thanks. I got the cross shipment Agreement form.

                            Release: pfSense 2.4.3(amd64)
                            M/B: Supermicro A1SRi-2558F
                            HDD: Intel X25-M 160G
                            RAM: 2x8Gb Kingston ECC ValueRAM
                            AP: Netgear R7000 (XWRT), Unifi AC Pro

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G
                              garyd9
                              last edited by

                              Can you please share how you're pushing back?  I have an approved RMA for repair… but the turn around time is going to be significant for me..  (Just the 2 way shipping time will be 3 weeks total.)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                doktornotor Banned
                                last edited by

                                @garyd9:

                                Can you please share how you're pushing back?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  dopey
                                  last edited by

                                  @garyd9: this was my post with a cut and paste of my exact email response when they rejected my cross-ship :)

                                  @dopey:

                                  the RMA person rejected the cross-shipping.  I ordered my motherboard august 2015.

                                  I responded with this:

                                  This was the response i received from technical support regarding my inquiry:
                                  Thanks for contacting us regarding the Atom C2000.

                                  You may submit a RMA at the following link to have the concerned issues addressed.  You may request the board to be cross-shipped during the RMA submission process.

                                  https://www.supermicro.com/support/rma/

                                  They told me I may request cross-ship.

                                  I was under the impression that the intel C2000 flaw couldn't be repaired and needed to be replaced.  My motherboard is still functioning but it's a critical piece of equipment for me (my router) and the downtime would be very inconvenient.

                                  And an hour later I got my cross-ship RMA form :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • G
                                    garyd9
                                    last edited by

                                    I begged.  It worked.  So, I'll get the replacement board in a few days instead of having to wait a month for roundtrip shipping and repair.

                                    Thank you, SuperMicro, for preemptively replacing a board that MIGHT break in the next 3 years without forcing me to wait until it's broken before addressing it.

                                    The irony is that I've already relocated pfsense to a VM in preparation of a long shipping/repair cycle.  Well, I'll be glad to get the critical router back to dedicated hardware.  It's also good to know that I CAN (if needed) relocate router functions to hyper-v.  (Though it's not quite as easy as I expected due to different interface naming.)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DerelictD
                                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                      last edited by

                                      'll be glad to get the critical router back to dedicated hardware.

                                      If it is critical you should have at least two.

                                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • G
                                        garyd9
                                        last edited by

                                        @Derelict:

                                        If it is critical you should have at least two.

                                        True…  Of course, "critical" in this particular instance is because when the router goes down, my wife/kids whine.  So, probably "critical" might be too strong of a term.

                                        At least the experience has taught me how to get the router working in a VM in case I ever have issues again.  I guess what I need to learn is how to set up a VM so that it can more easily take over the router functions without my having to manually edit config.xml files (to change interface names from igbX to hnX) and then manually restore them.  (I'd still have to manually move the WAN ethernet cable... I think.)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dennypageD
                                          dennypage
                                          last edited by

                                          @garyd9:

                                          True…  Of course, "critical" in this particular instance is because when the router goes down, my wife/kids whine.  So, probably "critical" might be too strong of a term.

                                          When my wife is upset, it's critical to me. That's why I have a spare SG-4860.

                                          :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • W
                                            whosmatt
                                            last edited by

                                            @garyd9:

                                            At least the experience has taught me how to get the router working in a VM in case I ever have issues again.  I guess what I need to learn is how to set up a VM so that it can more easily take over the router functions without my having to manually edit config.xml files (to change interface names from igbX to hnX) and then manually restore them.  (I'd still have to manually move the WAN ethernet cable… I think.)

                                            CARP and the redundancy features in pfSense work wonderfully for this… provided you have at least three static IP addresses on your WAN... probably you don't on a standard residential connection.  Otherwise, a simple nightly config backup and something like sed will easily provide you with a ready-to-go config file for your backup router (if the hardware is different).  Otherwise just the backup is fine.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.