Nintendo Switch - Needs static port on its outbound NAT
-
Are you sure about this?
I just tried and you can't set the console IP as the source as the only options are Network, Any or This Firewall.
think you may have applied Static Port to the whole LAN not the Switch specifically, in which case you do not need a new rule, just modify the existing one.
-
Nope, just the switch. Use network and /32 for a single host on the outbound NAT source.
-
Thanks for this! I just spent the hour trying to get the Splatoon 2 test fire working and for all I know, the entire event was to show off their new "Unable to connect" screen (I have a screenshot if you want to see it - it is very pretty!)
I had UPNP enabled for the right addresses and it did nothing. I then unchecked the 'deny access by default' option and it still did nothing. If that didn't help, what good is UPNP anyway? Or is this just Nintendo writing bad network code?
Anyway, thanks again!
-
Well UPnP is for inbound connections, outbound NAT is for outbound. Apparently the way their multiplayer code works, it needs to send back to the console on a particular port, which needs to be static so it's the same in both directions. Not sure why game servers can't just send back to the port it came from, but who knows…
So UPnP does nothing for that kind of setup. Just setup the static port outbound NAT as I laid out above and it should be fine.
At least there are two more days of test fires so keep trying. There are times tomorrow and Sunday. And even one more tonight. See attached (times in EDT)
Edit: Not my pic. Shamelessly lifted from Reddit.
-
Still annoying that Nintendo did it this way.
For a portable device that most likely will get used a fair bit on public networks that you CAN'T specify their outbound NAT settings, it seems like a very poor design indeed.
Thanks for reminding me about the /32, it was only hours later I realised my mistake. Its just been one of those days.
-
I made a thread dealing with these issues (https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?reportsent;topic=127837.msg705258#msg705258) and followed your directions which were already mostly done besides hybrid NAT. I had no luck with those changes sadly and it's the end of the testfire so I'm unable to test further for now.
-
Just to confirm, making those changes did make it work for me.
Thanks again.sirjorj
-
Good advice jimp! I will purchase it this weekend
-
This worked for me like a charm for months. Yesterday I received a second DSL and setup a multi-wan. Got the usual error again. So I added the static NAT for the second WAN line as well and to ne safe added a firewall rule so that the console only uses the original first WAN.
Now sometimes it works and sometimes it does not. In the states diag I only see the first DSL being used. I am puzzled by this.
-
If your Multi-WAN setup is using Load Balancing, you might need to force the switch to a failover group instead so it is not balanced. It might be sending some traffic out WAN1, other traffic out WAN2, and since the far side sees different addresses it may be cutting that off.
-
Already did that… Quote: "added a firewall rule so that the console only uses the original first WAN. "
One day later everything seems to be fine. Maybe some missing old states.... Will monitor it...
-
These kind of posts are why I love this platform. I've never seen a platform where the actual people working on it post informational things like this for everyone to use.
Major kudos to the Pfsense team.
-
This worked for the Switch AND for the PS4 that had NAT type 3.
-
Sorry for reviving an old post but should I disable static ports on all other mappings? For example, the automatically created rules for localhost to WAN, LAN to WAN, OPT1 to WAN, etc.? I also have multiple game systems that require the static port on. Is it all right to have static ports on all of them ON at the same time? I'm still very new to pfSense (this is my post here, in fact!).
-
Thank you very much a very simple and elegant solution. You made my son very happy. I will be adding other console to help with gaming.
Thank Again. :)
-
Sorry for reviving an old post but should I disable static ports on all other mappings? For example, the automatically created rules for localhost to WAN, LAN to WAN, OPT1 to WAN, etc.? I also have multiple game systems that require the static port on. Is it all right to have static ports on all of them ON at the same time? I'm still very new to pfSense (this is my post here, in fact!).
As long as they do not need the same source port to talk with the same destination address:port it should be OK. There can only be one state for each local_wan_ip:port <-> remote_ip:port combination. Setting static port just means that the source port is left untranslated when connections are made outbound. If the local machine connects using source port 55000, then that port will be used on the WAN interface as the source port. Without static set, the port can be randomly selected from the ephemeral port space (1024 to 65535) and translated on WAN.
-
this solved my problem on both the wii u and switch. thank you!
-
Hi thank you for this guide. I had problems getting the NAT type from a D to a C or B even after following your steps but I eventually figured out what was happening.
In the step below, I found that the Mappings order was important. I originally added the rule as the last entry. When I moved the Mappings entry up above the other LAN entries I started getting NAT type B.
…
3. Add Outbound NAT rule
- Firewall > NAT, Outbound tab
- Click +
- Set the console address as the source (Type = Network, then enter the IP address, pick /32 for the CIDR)
- Check Static Port
- Save/Apply
...
-
Well, i did exactly this, but my switch still says its type D :(
Maybe someone sees anything I missed here: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=141535.0
-
I posted this in a different thread by accident ….
having some trouble here - I'm getting the error Nintendo code:
error code: 2618-0516
NAT traversal process has failed
etc…I've attached the firewall/nat/outbound screen - have I missed anything?
