Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    [Resolvido] Configuração VPN IPsec Pfsense > CISCO ASA

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Portuguese
    21 Posts 2 Posters 4.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • marcellocM
      marcelloc
      last edited by

      wesleylc1,

      Tomei a liberdade de mascarar os ips reais do seu log mas ainda tem imagem mostrando o ip real.

      O log que postou, mostra troca de mensagem entre os dois peers, isso deveria estar aparecendo no log da outra ponta da vpn também.

      Como tem negociação de fase2 (esp ), tem certeza que a fase1 não está fechanado?

      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

      Help a community developer! ;D

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
        last edited by

        Olá, boa noite Marcello.
        Obrigado pela iniciativa de fazer o mascaramento nos ips que estavam nos meus logs.

        Com relação a sua resposta a onde voce informa que  nos meus log's existe a troca entre dois peers, mas porem esqueci de mencionar que eu já tenho um outro tunel que esta fechado entre a minha matriz e filial, essa troca entre peers deve ser entre essas duas pontas, agora para facilitar o entendimento, eu desabilitei o meu tunel entre matriz e filial e deixei habilitado apenas o tunel que estou tentando fechar com meu fornecedor.

        E com relação ao seu questionamento se esta com negociação com fase2 (esp) esta comunicação se refere ao tunel que já esta OK, matriz e filial.

        May 17 20:57:55	charon		09[NET] <75> sending packet: from 187.75.209.xxx[500] to 200.196.59.yyy[500] (56 bytes)
May 17 20:57:55	charon		09[IKE] <75> IKE_SA (unnamed)[75] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING
May 17 20:57:57	charon		10[CFG] vici client 50 connected
May 17 20:57:57	charon		09[CFG] vici client 50 registered for: list-sa
May 17 20:57:57	charon		09[CFG] vici client 50 requests: list-sas
May 17 20:57:57	charon		10[CFG] vici client 50 disconnected
May 17 20:57:57	charon		12[CFG] vici client 51 connected
May 17 20:57:57	charon		12[CFG] vici client 51 registered for: list-sa
May 17 20:57:57	charon		10[CFG] vici client 51 requests: list-sas
May 17 20:57:57	charon		13[CFG] vici client 51 disconnected
May 17 20:57:58	charon		10[CFG] vici client 52 connected
May 17 20:57:58	charon		12[CFG] vici client 52 registered for: list-sa
May 17 20:57:58	charon		12[CFG] vici client 52 requests: list-sas
May 17 20:57:58	charon		13[CFG] vici client 52 disconnected
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[NET] <76> received packet: from 200.196.59.yyy500] to 187.75.209.xxx[500] (176 bytes)
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[ENC] <76> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> looking for an ike config for 187.75.209.xxx...200.196.59.yyy
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> candidate: %any...%any, prio 24
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> found matching ike config: %any...%any with prio 24
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> received XAuth vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> received DPD vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> received draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> 200.196.59.yyy is initiating a Main Mode IKE_SA
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> IKE_SA (unnamed)[76] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> selecting proposal:
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> selecting proposal:
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> proposal matches
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> received proposals: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> configured proposals: IKE:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/CURVE_25519, IKE:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/CAMELLIA_CBC_128/CAMELLIA_CBC_192/CAMELLIA_CBC_256/3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/HMAC_SHA2_384_192/HMAC_SHA2_512_256/HMAC_MD5_96/HMAC_SHA1_96/AES_XCBC_96/AES_CMAC_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_512/PRF_AES128_XCBC/PRF_AES128_CMAC/PRF_HMAC_MD5/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/ECP_256/ECP_384/ECP_521/ECP_256_BP/ECP_384_BP/ECP_512_BP/CURVE_25519/MODP_3072/MODP_4096/MODP_8192/MODP_2048/MODP_1024, IKE:AES_GCM_16_128/AES_GCM_16_192/AES_GCM_16_256/AES_GCM_12_128/AES_GCM_12_192/AES_GCM_12_256/AES_GCM_8_128/AES_GCM_8_192/AES_GCM_8_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_384/PRF_HMAC_SHA2_512/PRF_AES128_XCBC/PRF_AES128_CMAC/PRF_HMAC_MD5/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/ECP_256/ECP_384/ECP_521/ECP_256_BP/ECP_384_BP/ECP_512_BP/CURVE_25519/MODP_3072/MODP_4096/MODP_8192/MODP_2048/MODP_1024
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> selected proposal: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> sending XAuth vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> sending DPD vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> sending FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> sending NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[ENC] <76> generating ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V V V ]
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[NET] <76> sending packet: from 187.75.209.xxx[500] to 200.196.59.yyy[500] (156 bytes)
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[NET] <76> received packet: from 200.196.59.yyy[500] to 187.75.209.xxx[500] (244 bytes)
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[ENC] <76> parsed ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> remote host is behind NAT
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[CFG] <76> candidate "bypasslan", match: 1/1/24 (me/other/ike)
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> no shared key found for 187.75.209.xxx - 200.196.59.yyy
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> queueing INFORMATIONAL task
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> activating new tasks
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> activating INFORMATIONAL task
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[ENC] <76> generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 564840140 [ N(INVAL_KE) ]
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[NET] <76> sending packet: from 187.75.209.xxx[500] to 200.196.59.yyy[500] (56 bytes)
May 17 20:58:00	charon		13[IKE] <76> IKE_SA (unnamed)[76] state change: CONNECTING => DESTROYING

        Mesmo desativando os tuneis entre minha matriz e filiais eu observei que as negociações ainda continua sendo feito, conforme informações no log, nesse log eu não consigo encontrar negociações da ponta Matriz –> Fornecedor.

        Eu anexei alguns print's com status da VPNS.

        IPsec_Overview.png_thumb
        IPsec_Overview.png
        IPsec_SADs.png
        IPsec_SADs.png_thumb
        IPsec_SPDs.png
        IPsec_SPDs.png_thumb

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • marcellocM
          marcelloc
          last edited by

          foca nesta parte aqui:

          May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[IKE] <76> 200.196.59.yyy is initiating a Main Mode IKE_SA
          May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[IKE] <76> IKE_SA (unnamed)[76] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
          May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[CFG] <76> selecting proposal:
          May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[CFG] <76> no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found

          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

          Help a community developer! ;D

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
            last edited by

            @marcelloc:

            foca nesta parte aqui:

            May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[IKE] <76> 200.196.59.yyy is initiating a Main Mode IKE_SA
            May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[IKE] <76> IKE_SA (unnamed)[76] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
            May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[CFG] <76> selecting proposal:
            May 17 20:58:00 charon 13[CFG] <76> no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found

            Marcello, bom dia.

            Então essa parte faze referência ao tunel que já esta funcionando, eu fiz uma outra coleta de log a onde tem a tentativa de troca entre as pontas que estão com problemas.

            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>queueing ISAKMP_VENDOR task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>queueing ISAKMP_CERT_PRE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>queueing MAIN_MODE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>queueing ISAKMP_CERT_POST task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>queueing ISAKMP_NATD task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>queueing QUICK_MODE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>activating new tasks
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>activating ISAKMP_VENDOR task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>activating ISAKMP_CERT_PRE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>activating MAIN_MODE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>activating ISAKMP_CERT_POST task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>activating ISAKMP_NATD task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>sending XAuth vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>sending DPD vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>sending FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>sending NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>sending draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02\n vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>initiating Main Mode IKE_SA con2000[7] to 201.77.217.70
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>IKE_SA con2000[7] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CFG] <con2000|7>configured proposals: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[ENC] <con2000|7>generating ID_PROT request 0 [ SA V V V V V ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[NET] <con2000|7>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (176 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (116 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ SA V V ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received NAT-T (RFC 3947) vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received FRAGMENTATION vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>selecting proposal:
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>proposal matches55.248
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>received proposals: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>configured proposals: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>selected proposal: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>reinitiating already active tasks
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>ISAKMP_VENDOR task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>MAIN_MODE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>generating ID_PROT request 0 [ KE No NAT-D NAT-D ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (244 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (304 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received Cisco Unity vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received XAuth vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>received unknown vendor ID: fb:21:43:f4:06:1f:2b:6f:f0:1b:c0:61:cb:f7:43:df
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>received unknown vendor ID: 1f:07:f7:0e:aa:65:14:d3:b0:fa:96:54:2a:50:01:00
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>reinitiating already active tasks
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>ISAKMP_VENDOR task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>MAIN_MODE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH N(INITIAL_CONTACT) ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (100 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (84 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ ID HASH V ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received DPD vendor ID
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>IKE_SA con2000[7] established between 187.75.209.246[187.75.209.246]…201.77.217.70[201.77.217.70]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>IKE_SA con2000[7] state change: CONNECTING => ESTABLISHED
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>activating new tasks
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>activating QUICK_MODE task
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>configured proposals: ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_768/NO_EXT_SEQ
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>configured proposals: ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_768/NO_EXT_SEQ
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>configured proposals: ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_768/NO_EXT_SEQ
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>proposing traffic selectors for us:
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>192.168.40.0/22|/0
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>proposing traffic selectors for other:
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] <con2000|7>172.20.3.224/29|/0
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>generating QUICK_MODE request 2020508884 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (268 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (92 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2948734236 [ HASH N((24576)) ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>received (24576) notify
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (308 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2489781574 [ HASH N(INVAL_ID) ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>received INVALID_ID_INFORMATION error notify
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CHD] <con2000|7>CHILD_SA con2000{47} state change: CREATED => DESTROYING
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (84 bytes)
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2777439799 [ HASH D ]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received DELETE for IKE_SA con2000[7]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>deleting IKE_SA con2000[7] between 187.75.209.XXX[187.75.209.XXX]…201.77.217.YY[201.77.217.YY]
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>IKE_SA con2000[7] state change: ESTABLISHED => DELETING
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>IKE_SA con2000[7] state change: DELETING => DELETING
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>IKE_SA con2000[7] state change: DELETING => DESTROYING
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[CFG] vici client 213 connected
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CFG] vici client 213 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CFG] vici client 213 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CFG] vici client 213 disconnected
            May 18 09:23:58 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CFG] vici client 214 connected
            May 18 09:23:58 PRJGWSP charon: 06[CFG] vici client 214 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:23:58 PRJGWSP charon: 06[CFG] vici client 214 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:23:58 PRJGWSP charon: 06[CFG] vici client 214 disconnected
            May 18 09:24:03 PRJGWSP charon: 15[CFG] vici client 215 connected
            May 18 09:24:03 PRJGWSP charon: 06[CFG] vici client 215 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:24:03 PRJGWSP charon: 16[CFG] vici client 215 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:24:03 PRJGWSP charon: 16[CFG] vici client 215 disconnected
            May 18 09:24:08 PRJGWSP charon: 15[CFG] vici client 216 connected
            May 18 09:24:08 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 216 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:24:08 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 216 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:24:08 PRJGWSP charon: 15[CFG] vici client 216 disconnected
            May 18 09:24:13 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 217 connected
            May 18 09:24:13 PRJGWSP charon: 12[CFG] vici client 217 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:24:13 PRJGWSP charon: 12[CFG] vici client 217 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:24:13 PRJGWSP charon: 12[CFG] vici client 217 disconnected
            May 18 09:24:18 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 218 connected
            May 18 09:24:18 PRJGWSP charon: 15[CFG] vici client 218 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:24:18 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 218 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:24:18 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 218 disconnected
            May 18 09:24:23 PRJGWSP charon: 15[CFG] vici client 219 connected
            May 18 09:24:23 PRJGWSP charon: 09[CFG] vici client 219 registered for: list-sa
            May 18 09:24:23 PRJGWSP charon: 09[CFG] vici client 219 requests: list-sas
            May 18 09:24:23 PRJGWSP charon: 10[CFG] vici client 219 disconnected</con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7>

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
              last edited by

              Olá, boa noite pessoal.
              Estou muito precisando de uma solução para esta caso, alguem pode tentar me ajudar.

              At.te
              Wesley

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcellocM
                marcelloc
                last edited by 

                
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (308 bytes)
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2489781574 [ HASH N(INVAL_ID) ]
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[IKE] <con2000|7>received INVALID_ID_INFORMATION error notify
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 11[CHD] <con2000|7>CHILD_SA con2000{47} state change: CREATED => DESTROYING
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[NET] <con2000|7>received packet: from 201.77.217.YY[500] to 187.75.209.XXX[500] (84 bytes)
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[ENC] <con2000|7>parsed INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 2777439799 [ HASH D ]
May 18 09:23:53 PRJGWSP charon: 07[IKE] <con2000|7>received DELETE for IKE_SA con2000[7]</con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7></con2000|7>

                Se este trecho faz parte do túnel com problema, veja estes erros de HASH Invalido

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                  last edited by

                  Marcello, bom dia.

                  Os erros de HASH mencionado por você na ultima interação se refere as configurações desse print anexado?

                  ipsec-1.png
                  ipsec-1.png_thumb

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                    last edited by

                    Após realizar alteração para IKEv2 minha internet caiu e ele começou a gerar um monte logar.

                    May 21 11:04:23 PRJGWSP charon: 14[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 4 of request with message ID 0
                    May 21 11:04:23 PRJGWSP charon: 14[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:05:05 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 5 of request with message ID 0
                    May 21 11:05:05 PRJGWSP charon: 16[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>giving up after 5 retransmits
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>peer not responding, trying again (3/3)
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>IKE_SA con2[51] state change: CONNECTING => CREATED
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating new tasks
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_VENDOR task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_INIT task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_NATD task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_CERT_PRE task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_AUTH task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_CERT_POST task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_CONFIG task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating CHILD_CREATE task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>activating IKE_AUTH_LIFETIME task
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>initiating IKE_SA con2[51] to 201.77.217.YY
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[IKE] <con2|51>IKE_SA con2[51] state change: CREATED => CONNECTING
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[CFG] <con2|51>configured proposals: IKE:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[CFG] <con2|51>sending supported signature hash algorithms: sha1 sha256 sha384 sha512 identity
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[ENC] <con2|51>generating IKE_SA_INIT request 0 [ SA KE No N(NATD_S_IP) N(NATD_D_IP) N(FRAG_SUP) N(HASH_ALG) N(REDIR_SUP) ]
                    May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:06:25 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 1 of request with message ID 0
                    May 21 11:06:25 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:06:32 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 2 of request with message ID 0
                    May 21 11:06:32 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:06:45 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 3 of request with message ID 0
                    May 21 11:06:45 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:07:08 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 4 of request with message ID 0
                    May 21 11:07:08 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                    May 21 11:07:34 PRJGWSP charon: 12[KNL] creating rekey job for CHILD_SA ESP/0xc5eb5eae/200.196.59.134
                    May 21 11:07:34 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con1000|27>activating new tasks
                    May 21 11:07:34 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con1000|27>nothing to initiate</con1000|27></con1000|27></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51>

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • marcellocM
                      marcelloc
                      last edited by

                      @wesleylc1:

                      May 21 11:06:21 PRJGWSP charon: 16[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                      May 21 11:06:25 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 1 of request with message ID 0
                      May 21 11:06:25 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                      May 21 11:06:32 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 2 of request with message ID 0
                      May 21 11:06:32 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                      May 21 11:06:45 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 3 of request with message ID 0
                      May 21 11:06:45 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                      May 21 11:07:08 PRJGWSP charon: 12[IKE] <con2|51>retransmit 4 of request with message ID 0
                      May 21 11:07:08 PRJGWSP charon: 12[NET] <con2|51>sending packet: from 187.75.209.XXX[500] to 201.77.217.YY[500] (334 bytes)
                      May 21 11:07:34 PRJGWSP charon: 12[KNL] creating rekey job for CHILD_SA ESP/0xc5eb5eae/200.196.59.134</con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51></con2|51>

                      Neste trecho do log, aparentemente a outra ponta está te ignorando. 4 transmissões sem nenhuma resposta.

                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                      Help a community developer! ;D

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • W
                        wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                        last edited by

                        Agora esta com comunicação porem a ponta dele por algum motivo de regra não retorna a minha solicitação?

                        Agora por qual motivo que esta caindo a minha internet?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W
                          wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                          last edited by

                          Marcelo, agora quando eu habilito o túnel ele retorna com os logs abaixo e minha conexão para internet fica indisponível.

                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 08[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 187.75.209.XXX/32|/0 === 201.77.217.YY/32|/0 with reqid {31}
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 12[CFG] ignoring acquire, connection attempt pending
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 12[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 187.75.209.XXX/32|/0 === 201.77.217.YY/32|/0 with reqid {31}
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 12[CFG] ignoring acquire, connection attempt pending
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 12[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 187.75.209.XXX/32|/0 === 201.77.217.YY/32|/0 with reqid {31}
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 08[CFG] ignoring acquire, connection attempt pending
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 12[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 187.75.209.XXX/32|/0 === 201.77.217.YY/32|/0 with reqid {31}
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 16[CFG] ignoring acquire, connection attempt pending
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 16[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 187.75.209.XXX/32|/0 === 201.77.217.YY/32|/0 with reqid {31}
                          May 21 11:33:08 charon 16[CFG] ignoring acquire, connection attempt pending
                          May 21 11:33:09 charon 16[KNL] creating acquire job for policy 187.75.209.XXX/32|/0 === 201.77.217.YY/32|/0 with reqid {31}

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • W
                            wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                            last edited by

                            Marcelo, boa tarde.

                            você me sugere fazer mais algum procedimento?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • marcellocM
                              marcelloc
                              last edited by

                              Eu particularmente nunca vi a internet cair quanto habilita o ipsec.

                              Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                              Help a community developer! ;D

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • W
                                wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                                last edited by

                                Não está caindo quando habilitou o ipsec, está ficando sem conexão quando eu habilito esse túnel, eu estou com ipsec habilitado.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W
                                  wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                                  last edited by

                                  Prezados, boa tarde.

                                  Alguém tem mais alguma dica para tentar me ajudaR?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W
                                    wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance
                                    last edited by

                                    ![@marcelloc said in Configuração VPN IPsec Pfsense > CISCO ASA:

                                    ascarar os ips reais do seu log

                                    Marcello, boa tarde.
                                    Hoje consegui resolver este problema da VPN.
                                    Segue um print em anexo com os passos que realizei para obter exito.

                                    Agradeço pela sua atenção.
                                    0_1527277775746_NAT.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • marcellocM
                                      marcelloc
                                      last edited by

                                      Precisou fazer nat no túnel?

                                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                      Help a community developer! ;D

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • W
                                        wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance @marcelloc
                                        last edited by

                                        @marcelloc Sim, só funcionou após a configuração do NAT.

                                        marcellocM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • marcellocM
                                          marcelloc @wesleylc1
                                          last edited by

                                          @wesleylc1, só necessidade de configuração de nat quanto a sua faixa de rede também existe na outra ponta do túnel.

                                          Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                          Help a community developer! ;D

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • W
                                            wesleylc1 Rebel Alliance @marcelloc
                                            last edited by

                                            @marcelloc Sim na outra ponta do tunel tbm tem.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.